RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Gould writes: "Lawmakers in Washington worked quickly Tuesday to set legislative guardrails in support of NATO as President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly bashed the alliance, arrived in Europe for a NATO summit and meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin later in the week."

Senator Jack Reed proposed the measure. (photo: Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
Senator Jack Reed proposed the measure. (photo: Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

On Eve of NATO Summit Senate Votes to Constrain Trump

By Joe Gould, Defense News

11 July 18


awmakers in Washington worked quickly Tuesday to set legislative guardrails in support of NATO as President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly bashed the alliance, arrived in Europe for a NATO summit and meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin later in the week.

Hours after Trump landed in Brussels, the Senate passed a non-binding measure, 97-2, that expresses support for NATO, its mutual self-defense clause and calls on the administration to rush its whole-of-government strategy to counter Russia’s meddling in the U.S. and other democracies.

With the established global order on shaky footing, Trump’s weeklong trip to Europe will test already strained bonds with some of America’s closest allies, then put him face to face with the leader of the country whose electoral interference was meant to help put him in office.

Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., proposed the measure, which is technically a motion to instruct lawmakers who will reconcile the House and Senate defense policy bills for 2019. Republican Sens. Rand Paul and Mike Lee were the only senators to vote against it.

In a Senate floor speech Tuesday, Reed callled America’s commitment to NATO “ironclad” and Trump’s meeting with Putin “ill-advised.”

“I join my colleagues this afternoon in support of the motion which sends an important message to our allies, our partners, and our adversaries that the United States is unwavering in its support of Europe free from the threat of external aggression and in support of the rules-based international order that has promoted international security for decades,” Reed said.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee was expected Wednesday to debate a separate measure supporting NATO. One proposed amendment to it, from panel chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., would reaffirm support of Ukraine’s sovereignty and condemn “Russia’s illegal invasion and attempted annexation of Crimea.” A second proposed amendment from Sen. Robert Menendez, the panel’s ranking member, would reaffirm support for U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Trump’s wavering on NATO has led allies to question America’s trustworthiness, Menendez, D-N.J., said in a blistering floor speech.

“In the absence of U.S. presidential leadership, I want to make clear to our allies abroad, as well as our adversaries in the Kremlin, as to where members in the United States Senate stand,” said Menendez, adding that the chamber stands for the rule of law, an international order based on democratic values and with its allies.

“President Trump’s slap-dash approach to foreign policy, borne out of heated campaign rallies, instead of thoughtful Cabinet meetings, has real implications for our national security,” Menendez said. “Such reckless behavior by President Trump has weakened the United States on the global stage and created a more dangerous world for our citizens and our troops serving abroad.”

Menendez ripped Trump for saying his meeting with Putin would be the easiest of his four-country trip, as a sign Trump “would rather deal with an autocrat than negotiate with democratically elected leaders.”

“Let’s be clear: Meeting with a thug intent on undermining American democratic values should not be easy and it should not be chummy,” he said.

Menendez’s pursuit for a vote on Russia sanctions follows Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., saying — after a trip to Russia last week — the Senate may have gone too far with mandatory sanctions against a host of Russian entities, leaving Trump with too little negotiating room on other matters.

Johnson, chairs the Foreign Relations subcommittee for Europe, told the Washington Examiner, the sanctions, “don’t seem to be having a real horrible economic effect, not in Moscow anyway.”

Speaking with reporters and on Twitter from his flight, Trump repeated his call for NATO countries to fulfill their goal of spending 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defense by 2024. The summit is expected to be marked by disagreements over trade and military spending.

After the NATO summit in Brussels, Trump will travel to the UK and then Helsinki to meet with Putin. The meeting will be closely watched to see whether Trump will rebuke or embrace Putin, who has repeatedly denied the allegations of election meddling in spite of evidence to the contrary.

Republicans, in their support for Trump, have put the accent on his burden-sharing message — and several offered a resolution of their own that reinforces the need for greater defense spending in the alliance, as well as support for NATO.

“Only fair and equitable burden-sharing will make ‘peace through strength’ a NATO reality in the face of growing threats, including Russian aggression, terrorism and cybersecurity,” said Sen. Jim Inhofe, a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. “President Trump is right to strongly encourage all of our NATO allies to meet their commitment to defense spending under the collective security obligations.”

Outside of the Senate chamber, lawmakers expressed fears over both tone and substance of Trump’s talks at the NATO and Putin summits.

On the heels of leading a Republican delegation to Russia last week, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby cautioned Trump to be well-prepared, especially after the summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un produced, “a lot of optics and not a lot of substance yet.”

“My advice to the president, if he wanted any, would be: Careful, you’re dealing with a tough man, a smart man, and he probably wants to get something and give nothing in return,” Shelby, R-Ala., said of Putin.

Shelby also expressed some openness to easing sanctions if the deal was right.

“Would there be anything the Russians would concede,” he said. “If they want something, we ought to get something. They ought to earn their way.”

Senior administration officials said discussions of withdrawing U.S. troops from Germany will not be included in next week’s NATO summit, despite reports that Trump has considered the move.

“I think the president should listen to his security council and his secretary of defense on anything of substance dealing with the U.S. military posture,” Shelby said of the issue. “We’ve got to be careful. We’ve got to be strong. Concede nothing.”

Sen. Jeff Flake, a Republican critic of Trump’s who recently returned from a European trip, said the president ought to clearly stipulate Russia’s annexation of Crimea was illegal, that Russia ought to vacate Ukraine and that Russia interfered in U.S. elections.

“I know that our NATO allies are afraid of what the president might promise in terms of exercises, in terms of troops, location of troops, NATO expansion — whether it can take place,” said Flake, R-Ariz., adding that he was concerned, too.

Along similar lines, Senate NATO Observer Group Co-Chair Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., said Trump ought not to give Crimea to Russia. Halting U.S. involvement in joint exercises would be “disastrous,” she added.

“It undermines NATO, and NATO is crucial to our security,” she said. “The president doesn’t seem to understand that.”

Trump may not have the ability on a variety of issues to act unilaterally to make concessions on Crimea, sanctions or NATO’s structure, but even promising to do so would be troubling, said Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del. Coons, a Senate Foreign Relations Committee member, recently traveled to Sweden, Finland, Latvia and Denmark.

“Even rhetorically conceding ground on Crimea, on eastern Ukraine, on sanctions, I think undermines our close alliance with our European partners who have continued to extend tough sanctions on Russia for their ongoing intervention in Ukraine,” Coons said. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+8 # evolver 2018-07-11 11:05
...a slight and welcome relief... this vote encourages the hope that maybe these otherwise appearing to be shut down emotionally politicians are finally getting that great BIG human JOLT that suddenly informs humans that our survival is at risk. Not exactly the ah hah moment but more like the OMG one!
Good prevails!!! And shrapnel naturally falls back to the earth and rests upon the earth, in peace!
+1 # tedrey 2018-07-11 13:22
In referring to "support of Ukraine’s sovereignty" and condemning “Russia’s illegal invasion and attempted annexation of Crimea" I suppose the author is referring to the coup d'etat (where Russia appeared nowhere) which led to America and the NATO countries accepting the Kiev government as legitimate twithin two days.

I also might point out that "the rules-based international order that has promoted international security for decades" has allowed NATO nations to join America in promoting international INsecurity via constant warfare in the rest of the world.

Everyone needs to glance at the other side of each question once in a while . . . unless they're American or NATO governments, in which case no other side is conceivable.
+1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-07-12 07:09
Well, the congress just invited a Ukranian Nazi to address them. Andriy Parubiy addressed the Senate. They don't care about the real Nazis in Ukraine. He is the founder of the "Social National" party which is overtly modeled on the "Nations Socialist" or NAZI party of Germany. Israel is also supporting these Nazis.

Here is Max Blumenthal on this.

Ukrainian Fascist Leader Speaks in US Congress, While Nazis Launch Racist Attacks

Max Blumenthal: US is Arming Neo-Nazis in Ukraine
-3 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-07-12 07:12
NATO should be abolished. It has become an instrument of Euro/American imperialism, sending troops all over the world to fight regime change wars and wars for natural resources. NATO means "North Atlantic Treaty Organization." But it has expanced well beyond the North Atlantic. It has members in Eastern Europe or South West Asia (Turkey) and members in South America (Colombia).

NATO is the forefront of Euro/American permanent war on all non-white nations. I really do with Trump would withdraw the US from NATO but that will never happen. Trump would be assassinated if he really tried to do that.
+2 # DongiC 2018-07-14 17:05
RR, what is in your head? The reason for NATO was and is to protect the West from Soviet/Russian aggression. I don't think Putin's regime justifies letting our guard down. Not until he stops meddling in our elections and not until he gets out of Crimea should we even consider changeing our defensive posture with this ambitious and dangerous leader. I am not happy the way certain politicians disappear in Russia, especially those who don't agree with Putin.
0 # heraldmage 2018-07-15 01:33
Americans are so brainwashed. They believe anything the corporate media and US politicians say. Fake news isn't unique to the Trump administration the US government has used fake news to justify wars, both declared & undeclared, since at least 1898 Spanish American War.
The only thing the US government cares about is profit & unfettered corporate control of planetary resources. Trump is bullying NATO so they will buy US weapons rather then produce them within the EU.
Obama scapegoated Russia to force European NATO members to ignore austerity mandates & the needs of people to force the update of NATO & domestic military. Obama was a US weapons salesman too. The US & EU 2013-2014 Ukraine coup d'état placing the Bandera Nazi in power provoked Crimea & Donetsk regions declarations of independence. Crimea held a referendum, with international observers including Americans, where 95% of the 97% of the population voted to rejoin the Russian federation. Russia DID NOT invade Crimea! The soldiers in unmarked green uniforms were Ukrainian soldiers of Crimean descent stationed in Crimes who resigned from the Ukraine army & were sworn in to the newly created Crimean army.
The reason I know what happened is that events in both Crimea, & the Rada in Kiev were live streamed. The US & EU failed to reach their goal of gaining control of Ukraine's resources. Corporate profits are all they care & since they didn't get Donetsk & Crimea, they scapegoated Russia to increase weapons sales.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.