RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Woodruff writes: "The president's personal lawyers have teamed up with attorneys for other individuals embroiled in special counsel Bob Mueller's probe, multiple sources tell The Daily Beast."

Robert Mueller. (image: Lyne Lucien/Daily Beast)
Robert Mueller. (image: Lyne Lucien/Daily Beast)

Trump's Lawyers Plot Joint Defenses With Others Caught in Mueller Probe

By Betsy Woodruff, The Daily Beast

12 June 18

‘It gives the defendants an advantage,’ says a former deputy to independent prosecutor Ken Starr. ‘It allows them to know more about what’s going on in the investigation.’

he president’s personal lawyers have teamed up with attorneys for other individuals embroiled in special counsel Bob Mueller’s probe, multiple sources tell The Daily Beast. For a while, the president’s lawyers even had regular conference calls with other attorneys to discuss the Mueller investigation, according to one source familiar with the calls.

The arrangement is known as a joint defense agreement, and it allows the lawyers to share information—without violating attorney-client privilege. It’s a common strategy when multiple defendants are dealing with the same prosecutor on the same matter.

Joint defense agreements often annoy prosecutors since they let people being investigated share information and compare notes on what the government is doing.

“It gives the defendants an advantage,” said Sol Wisenberg, a criminal defense attorney with the firm Nelson Mullins. “It allows them to know more about what’s going on in the investigation.”

“Prosecutors don’t like it, but there’s not a damn thing they can do about it,” he added.

The Trump White House isn’t the first one to use joint defense agreements as a legal tool. Wisenberg, who was deputy independent counsel to Ken Starr on the Whitewater and Lewinsky investigations, said the Clinton White House employed them as well.

“They’re very common,” he said. “Clinton had them with virtually everybody when we were investigating him and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with them whatsoever.”

Joint defense agreements can also let people being investigated keep tabs on whether or not their allies have started cooperating with the government. For instance, Michael Flynn stopped sharing information with the president’s lawyers last November, as The New York Times reported—an early sign he had decided to start cooperating with the special counsel probe.

(Jay Sekulow, one of the president’s personal lawyers, declined to comment.)

“They’re not nefarious and they’re usually not used to be able to craft witnesses’ testimony or co-defendants’ testimony,” said Charles Clayman, a New York defense attorney with the firm Clayman & Rosenberg. “But it is sometimes used as a way to determine whether or not someone has flipped and begun to cooperate because once you do that, you have to withdraw from the JDA, return any documents that you have, and keep privileged anything that was said during those meetings.”

These agreements can also help defendants make sure their testimony aligns, according to former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti.

“The purpose is to be super open with each other so you develop a sense of trust, so you know that everybody in that group is working in the same direction, coordinating, as opposed to pointing fingers at each other, undercutting each other, etc.,” he said.

“It’s a way of exchanging information and coming up with an explanation that’s harmonious,” he added.

This week is poised to be less-than-harmonious for at least one person in Mueller’s sights: Paul Manafort, who will appear in court on Friday for a hearing where a judge will decide whether or not to revoke his bail. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

-2 # Dfnclblty 2018-06-12 18:37
makes it easier for DOJ to present indictments


Nothing will happen - DPRK has msm's addicted ears for the moment, and DOJ will slip into the sunset....
+1 # Texas Aggie 2018-06-13 06:11
-2 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-06-13 06:15
This seems like a good idea. Prosecutors like to keep their work as secret as possible. But a court trial is public. It needs to have everything exposed and clear. If all the defense attorneys share information, they can bring out more.

Mueller and some of this staff have bad histories of hiding evidence, destroying evidence, and presenting false evidence. The only way to discover this is to see that he tells different people different stories. He tries to use one person against another. If the defense attorneys share information, they can spot these clearly illegal manipulations.

This should be the goal of all investigations and trials:

“The purpose is to be super open with each other"

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.