RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Bartz writes: "AT&T Inc (T.N), which owns DirecTV, awaits a court ruling on Tuesday that will determine if it can buy Time Warner Inc (TWX.N), a decision that could prompt a cascade of pay TV companies buying television and movie makers and the first big test of the Trump administration's antitrust teams."

A combination photo shows the Time Warner shares price at the New York Stock Exchange and ATT logo in New York, NY, U.S., on November 15, 2017 and on October 23, 2016 respectively. (photo: Lucas Jackson/Stephanie Keith/Reuters)
A combination photo shows the Time Warner shares price at the New York Stock Exchange and ATT logo in New York, NY, U.S., on November 15, 2017 and on October 23, 2016 respectively. (photo: Lucas Jackson/Stephanie Keith/Reuters)


AT&T, Justice Department Await Decision That Could Determine Future of Media

By Diane Bartz, Reuters

12 June 18

 

T&T Inc (T.N), which owns DirecTV, awaits a court ruling on Tuesday that will determine if it can buy Time Warner Inc (TWX.N), a decision that could prompt a cascade of pay TV companies buying television and movie makers and the first big test of the Trump administration’s antitrust teams.

Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is expected to rule at 4 p.m. ET (2000 GMT) on whether the $85 billion deal may go forward more than 1-1/2 years after it was announced.

The government argued in a six-week trial this spring that AT&T’s ownership of DirecTV, which has 20 million subscribers, would become too powerful if combined with Time Warner, which owns Turner’s sports and CNN news. That power would allow the company to raise prices for pay TV rivals and online streaming services, the government said.

AT&T said the deal was legal, and pre-emptively offered to take any disputes with pay TV rivals to arbitration while refraining from withholding content, or “going dark”, during the arbitration.

If AT&T wins, the Justice Department may rethink whether to sue to stop other deals where a company buys a supplier, known as a “vertical merger.”

“It depends on the scope of the ruling. If it’s narrow, like ‘I don’t think Time Warner content is that must-have,’ that may have implications in a similar merger in the telecommunications space but may not have a drastic effect in other vertical mergers,” said Caroline Holland, who was in the Antitrust Division during the administration of former President Barack Obama.

A big win for the Justice Department would send shudders down the spines of M&A bankers pursuing deals where a company seeks to merge with a supplier.

Already one deal depends on the ruling: Comcast Corp (CMCSA.O) said in May that it was preparing a higher, all-cash offer for most of the media assets of Twenty-First Century Fox (FOXA.O), but sources say it will only proceed if AT&T wins its case.

Two other vertical deals under review are Cigna Corp’s (CI.N) plan to buy Express Scripts Holding Co (ESRX.O) for $52 billion and CVS Health Corp’s (CVS.N) planned merger with Aetna Inc (AET.N) for $69 billion.

Ahead of the court ruling, a top antitrust official at the Justice Department urged investors not to read too much into the decision to sue to stop AT&T from buying Time Warner.

Most proposed transactions were either good for consumers or neutral, said Makan Delrahim, the assistant attorney general for antitrust.

“I understand that some journalists and observers have recently expressed concern that the antitrust division no longer believes that vertical mergers can be efficient and beneficial to competition and consumers,” he said. “Rest assured these concerns are misplaced.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN