RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Grim writes: "On Monday morning, Elizabeth Falcone, a senior aide for Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top-ranking Democrat on the intelligence committee, announced the decision to restrict access in an email to Democratic legislative directors."

CIA director nominee Gina Haspel testifies at her confirmation. (photo: Aaron P. Bernstein/Reuters)
CIA director nominee Gina Haspel testifies at her confirmation. (photo: Aaron P. Bernstein/Reuters)

Ahead of Gina Haspel Vote, Senate Pulls Access to Damning Classified Memo

By Ryan Grim, The Intercept

15 May 18


s the Senate prepares for a Wednesday vote on whether to confirm Gina Haspel as director of the CIA, the Senate Intelligence Committee has restricted access to a classified memo that Democratic staff put together, detailing Haspel’s role in advocating for torture and later destroying related evidence. 

On Monday morning, Elizabeth Falcone, a senior aide for Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top-ranking Democrat on the intelligence committee, announced the decision to restrict access in an email to Democratic legislative directors. The memo had previously been available for senators and staff with security clearances to review in a Secure Compartmented Information Facility housed within Congress. Staff will no longer be able to review the document, and senators will only be able to do so upon request. It has been removed from the SCIF.

In Falcone’s email, which a Senate source shared with The Intercept, she said that the memo was “unable to be viewed.” (Over the weekend, both The Intercept and NBC News inquired about the existence of the memo, and NBC reported Monday afternoon that it had been removed from the Senate’s secure space.)

Folks – the classified Intel staff memo that has been available on haspel ?is currently not at senate security and unable to be viewed. If you have urgent need to read it, please call me or have your chief call mine. Thx.

The decision to restrict access to the memo is especially unusual given that Warner just last week criticized the CIA for an “unacceptable” lack of transparency in the run-up to Haspel’s hearing.  

“Given that we are only two days from the date of your confirmation hearing on May 9, 2018, this lack of transparency for the American people about someone nominated for a cabinet-level position is unacceptable,” Warner wrote. “As the acting Director of the CIA, it is in your power to order the declassification of relevant material or to hasten the process. I urge you to take immediate action to remedy these problems.”

Warner’s move has heightened fears among Haspel opponents that Warner is preparing to vote to confirm Haspel.

The classified memo was compiled by the minority staff on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Relying on classified records, it goes into detail on Haspel’s role in torture, the destruction of evidence, and her tenure more broadly, according to people briefed on its contents.

The memo draws from the results of an investigation by special prosecutor John Durham, who looked into CIA activity following 9/11 and ultimately chose not to bring charges.

People briefed on the contents of the memo say that it is not possible to read it and come away without serious doubts about whether Haspel ought to be confirmed.

Yasmine Taeb, senior policy counsel for the Center for Victims of Torture, said that it’s crucial for senators to read the classified memo before announcing their votes. “This nomination fight is not over,” she said. “There are several Republican offices that have expressed concerns over Haspel’s nomination. We hope that senators will read all the materials made available to them — not just documents provided by the CIA but also the memo prepared by the SSCI minority staff.”

Yet according to Senate sources, few senators have viewed the memo, and with the vote scheduled for Wednesday, crucial lawmakers have begun announcing their positions. Warner has yet to announce how he’ll vote, and opponents of Haspel worry the senator will side with the CIA and vote to confirm Haspel, despite a furious grassroots push.

Emily Phelps, a spokesperson for Indivisible, which has been rallying opponents to call the Capitol, said that constituents will soon be asking “whether or not their senators have reviewed all the documents that are available.”

Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. and Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., have both said that they will vote to confirm Haspel, while Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and John McCain, R-Ariz., have announced their opposition.

For opponents of the use of torture, there is already ample public evidence that warrants a rejection of Haspel. The same is true for advocates of the rule of law. But a majority of senators are still undecided on the Haspel nomination, which makes the classified information available to them all the more important — and all the more important that they actually read it.

Last week, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said, “I have never in my life wished that more classified information could be available to the public,” after reviewing classified documents about Haspel.

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., one of the few Republicans yet to commit to supporting Haspel, has called for the contents of the Durham report, an extensive report on which the classified memo is partly based, to be made available to senators.

Haspel herself, with her recent testimony, has given senators a reason to fact-check her. “There was an internal investigation of the issue conducted by one of my predecessors, Mr. Morell, who found no fault with my actions and that my decisions were consistent with my obligations as an agency officer,” Haspel said during her confirmation hearing last week.

Haspel is referring to former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell, who wrote a cover letter to the Durham report that resulted in no charges. The CIA declassified Morell’s memo, but not the underlying investigation, which leaves the public to guess at what’s underneath.

But Morell has left some hints that the exoneration was not a clean one. He later wrote in his memoir that Durham had declined to press charges, but added: “Durham concluded, however, that such legal authority had not existed and that Agency lawyers had erred in their legal judgment.” Haspel’s role in that illegal effort is laid out clearly in the documents available for senators to review.

Haspel knows what that investigation found, but in her testimony, she pointedly referenced Morell’s summary, rather than the investigation itself. In doing so, was she misleading the Senate?

The answer can be found in a classified memo that Senate leaders are taking pains to keep away from the eyes of senators. It used to be in the basement, but now it’s not even there. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+42 # Working Class 2018-05-15 13:46
I keep hearing the phase "techniques that are now illegal". They have always been illegal under international law and prior to word games played by the Bush Administration the US considered them illegal as well. The US executed Japanese officers after WWII for among other things, waterboarding. We need to face the fact that the US sanctioned and committed crimes against humanity/war crimes. People like Dick Cheney should be told to shut-up and thank his good fortune that he has not been turned over to the International Criminal Court.
+2 # Salus Populi 2018-05-16 14:29
Hardly his "good fortune," which implies chance. The U.S. signed and ratified the torture treaty, which left no room for judgments.

Torture is illegal under any and all circumstances, and "torture" includes psychological torture. The signatories are obligated either to try the offenders themselves or to turn them over to international bodies for trial.

Under the Constitution, treaties are considered the highest form of the law, and presidents are required to "faithfully execute" the Constitution and derivative laws. The fact that Obama chose not to exercise his delineated responsibility simply means that he committed high crimes and misdemeanors while in office -- not arguably, but factually.

The U.S. cashiered officers who carried out water torture during the Philippine Moro war at the beginning of the twentieth century. During my lifetime, the U.S. indignantly accused the Kremlin of carrying out torture, citing the water torture as a specific instance.

Cheney, Brennan, Rodrigeuz, Haspel, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice, Biden, Obama, Bush, and all other senior officials who have authorized either force feeding or water torture should be spending the rest of their lives in a maximum security prison, not profiting from their disgusting crimes and mass murders.

When the Uruguayan Tupamaros captured Dan Mitrione, they tried him for crimes against humanity, found him guilty, and executed him. If we frown on capital punishment, a life sentence should be _de reguir_.
+45 # Lgfoot 2018-05-15 14:03
Hassle's destruction of evidence which Tenent himself ordered to be retained is sufficient reason to oppose her appointment. The fact that she still maintains that the torture was legal, when it violated international law, federal statutes and CIA policy is also compelling reason to disqualify her. Respect for John McCain's experience in Viet Nam and his opinion in this matter would also militate toward her rejection, despite what one might otherwise think of many of his policy positions.
+8 # Jim at Dr.Democracy on Facebook 2018-05-15 14:16
What's the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans?

For important matters, to stand up for genuine principles or for the rights and the general welfare of the citizenry, there is very little difference between these two parties.
+16 # Juanbaltimore 2018-05-15 14:43
MARK WARNER - "Democrat" in name only. Hope someone is going to run against him in the next primary.
+18 # madams12 2018-05-15 14:51
Virginia senator Mark Warner has acknowledged that he WILL vote for sadistic torturer in charge, Gina Haspel tomorrow. Disregarding the Durham report or any shred of personal ethical morality or conscience. FIVE DEMS crossed the aisle to support Haspel's nomination...Wa rner claims she's strong enough to stand up to Trump etc etc. ha!
+14 # PABLO DIABLO 2018-05-15 15:17
Gina Haspel likes to torture people, destroy evidence, and break the law = perfect to head the CIA. They've been doing it since their inception.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.