RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Crunden writes: "Some of the concerned citizens who turned up at city council meetings in New Orleans to support a proposed power plant were in fact paid actors, according to a new report."

A nuclear power plant in Louisiana. (photo: Getty Images)
A nuclear power plant in Louisiana. (photo: Getty Images)


Actors Were Paid to Attend New Orleans City Council Meetings Supporting Power Plant

By E.A. Crunden, ThinkProgress

06 May 18


A report says performers were paid between $60 and $200 to support Entergy's efforts.

ome of the concerned citizens who turned up at city council meetings in New Orleans to support a proposed power plant were in fact paid actors, according to a new report.

The Lens New Orleans reported Friday that at least four people received payment for appearing at city council meetings last October and February. The meetings were held to survey public opinion on efforts by Entergy, an energy company that serves areas throughout the Deep South, to develop a new power plant in New Orleans East, located in the city’s Ninth Ward.

In March, the city council approved the power plant by a vote of 6-1, overruling the objections of opponents who say the plant is expensive and will pollute eastern New Orleans. A number of local residents spoke in favor of the power plant over the course of more than 22 meetings. But doubts are now being raised over just how authentic those voices were.

Roughly 50 people turned out to support a $210 million effort to build a power plant in the city during one October meeting, but several attendees told the Lens they were paid $60 to wear orange shirts and express support for the endeavor.

Actors with speaking roles who read pre-written statements were reportedly paid $200. One told the publication he recognized as many as 15 people in the audience as local performers.

“They paid us to sit through the meeting and clap every time someone said something against wind and solar power,” said Keith Keough, who said that he was “not political” but needed the money.

The actors were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements barring them from discussing the agreement, but several agreed to speak with the Lens on condition of anonymity. Keough, who moved to North Carolina in the time period following the meetings, agreed to be named after a friend who recognized him at the gatherings encouraged him to come forward.

The staged performances seem to have been organized by two men, Garrett Wilkerson and Daniel Taylor, who are not believed to be from New Orleans. In a Facebook message, Wilkerson laid out the specifics of the job to one actor.

“The council already supports it, this is mostly just to show them that the citizens don’t have a problem with it,” Wilkerson said. “Free pizza and a round of drinks after it’s over, at which point pay will be dispersed in cash… I’m prepared to offer you a non speaking role for $60 plus bonus potential.”

Talking points offered to those with speaking roles included comparing New Orleans to a developing country and indicating the power plant might reduce crime. Actors were later paid for their efforts at a local Dave & Busters.

Officials for Entergy released a statement following the Lens’ report, saying the company played no role in hiring the actors.

“As we have stated previously, Entergy New Orleans did not pay anyone to attend the Council meetings or direct anyone to attend public meetings. Instead, we worked tirelessly to encourage our supporters to take time from their busy workday schedules to testify on behalf of this project. That scores of them did so in multiple settings is a testament to a tremendous level of support,” the statement read.

Entergy has argued the power plant is necessary to offset potential transmission failure across New Orleans. But the plant has been met with strong opposition from environmentalists, who worry it will exacerbate pollution in the Southern city.

Local residents have also questioned why pre-existing transmission lines operated by the company can’t be updated, something that would cost far less money. Activists and lawmakers are now concerned that paid actors may have played an outsized role in securing approval for the plant.

Councilwoman Stacy Head, the lone dissenting vote against the power plant, called the prospect of paid actors “morally reprehensible”.

“I think it had a phenomenal impact on public opinion,” she said. It is unclear whether hiring the actors would constitute a violation of the law.

A coalition of organizations opposing the power plant, including the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice and the Sierra Club, have said they plan to ask the New Orleans City Council and other officials to examine whether or not the actors were in fact paid and to take legal action if necessary. A separate lawsuit brought by the coalition in April also says the city council broke the law in failing to seriously consider alternatives to the plant.

Entergy has also come under fire for power outages across the city unrelated to the new power plant. Between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2017, the company said it has experienced roughly 2,600 outages. Of those, 1,500 happened during fair weather conditions with minimal interference from rain and wind.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+7 # BetaTheta 2018-05-06 19:21
One wonders if this is actually a common practice.
 
 
+7 # treerapper 2018-05-07 02:24
Hiring actors is an overt act of fraud and any official who doesn't see this or acknowledge it should be relieved of his or her duties and obligations to serve the public interest.

Energy of DAPL fame is a dirty dealing operation, willing to use any and all subversive tactics to accomplish their goal - more and more plants and pipelines.

I hope they sue their gangster asses into oblivion!!!
 
 
+5 # elizabethblock 2018-05-07 07:41
Shocked, but on second thought not surprised.
 
 
+6 # Kootenay Coyote 2018-05-07 07:56
Well, now we know why Republicans have been accusing the Florida school kids of being paid actors: it's an established Right-wing strategy that they're projecting wildly....
 
 
+5 # chrisconno 2018-05-07 09:21
That's why those nasty republicans were accusing the kids from the Parkland massacre of being actors. Because those who are guilty like to accuse others of just what they themselves are so guilty of. It's an abuser's tactic. Always throw the blame else where. When are we going to cure this plague of creepy abusing republicans. Surely not all republicans are this creepy, so where have all the good ones gone?
 
 
+4 # NAVYVET 2018-05-07 14:31
This nothing new, and such shenanigans can be sued only in some -- not all -- states.
 
 
+3 # CEB 2018-05-09 11:10
Wow! Another redevelopment scheme for the Ninth Ward which doesn't include any provision for people, like decent housing, and support services. Since Katrina and before, if you count the fact that the levees were flawed and it was well known, quite the opposite has been the modus operandi. Put something there which may threaten the health of people nearby. This move harkens back to a time- honored municipal planning practice-- put the dangerous, ugly, smelly and/ or otherwise offensive uses in the neighborhoods of the poor and powerless. And then make sure no one does anything when contaminants start to threaten the residents who are too poor, old, tired, disabled , or resigned to the short end of the stick to leave. Infrastructure upgrade and urban renewal ( otherwise known in the old days as Negro removal) all in one. Efficiency and expediency rules the day! Morally reprehensible doesn't begin to describe it. The use of paid actors to further these interests underscores the inherent corruption and moral bankruptcy of the entire scheme.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN