RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Rogers writes: "The American Civil Liberties Union has a message for politicians pledging to preserve net neutrality: it's time for cities to start public ISPs."

Protest to save net neutrality. (photo: Jack Guez/Getty)
Protest to save net neutrality. (photo: Jack Guez/Getty)

ACLU: To Protect Democracy, Cities Should Build Their Own ISPs

By Kaleigh Rogers, Motherboard

30 March 18

In a report sent to more than 100 mayors in 30 states who had expressed support for net neutrality, the American Civil Liberties Union recommends a move to municipally-owned broadband.

he American Civil Liberties Union has a message for politicians pledging to preserve net neutrality: it’s time for cities to start public ISPs.

After the Federal Communications Commission killed federal net neutrality protections last fall, local legislators across the country have stated their support for a free and open internet. But while sending letters to congress and the FCC opposing the changes is well and good, the ACLU argues in a new report published Thursday that creating municipally-owned ISPs is the best way to preserve net neutrality.

“Internet service has become as essential as utilities like water and electricity, and local governments should treat it that way,” Jay Stanley, the report’s principal author and a senior policy analyst with the ACLU, said in a press release. “With the Trump administration and for-profit companies abandoning (net neutrality) values, what we’re seeing around the country is that local governments can protect them and provide access for all.”

The ACLU sent a copy of its report to more than 100 mayors in 30 states who had expressed support for net neutrality. It examines existing municipal broadband initiatives, such as in Chattanooga, Tennessee, to demonstrate that there are multiple different successful models for rolling out a utility-like local internet, and suggests best practices for getting a network started. Private-public partnerships and co-op ISPs are another option beyond supplying internet like water or power. These options have succeeded in many cities and towns around the country already, are shown to be reliable, high-speed, and more affordable than private ISPs.

The ACLU frames access to the internet as essentially a democratic right, calling out private ISPs for focusing too much on profit at the expense of people’s privacy.

“Fair access to high-quality internet is a constitutional issue because such access is essential to our ability to access and share information, which in turn enables us to shape our political, civic, and social systems,” the report reads. “In a democracy, it is vital that citizens have actual and felt control over the institutions that govern their lives—including their increasingly crucial broadband providers.”

Big Telecom has long fought against municipally-run internet, claiming that it’s unfair for the government to compete with private businesses on the free market. The trouble is that, for many American towns, the private ISP companies aren’t offering any other options. Combined with the lack of net neutrality protections, the ACLU argues that municipal networks are the best option.

“If local leaders want to protect their constituents’ rights and expand quality internet access, then community broadband is an excellent way to do that,” Stanley said. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+3 # Yadayada 2018-03-30 11:38
Why would it be unfair for the government to compete with private businesses on the free market?
Aren't government-run programs less efficient than privately run ones?
What are they afraid of?

Oh, I see. Monopoly, golden eggs goose etc.

Seriously, municipal or even state-run ISPs are the solution.
+3 # librarian1984 2018-03-30 11:56
Today's capitalism isn't free market, allows no 'invisible hand', is subsidized, protects monopolies but not workers, gives diproportionate importance to short term gain, doesn't tolerate actual competition and has undue influence on legislation and regulation.

This is a great idea. Of course now the situationally states'-rights Republicans will try to say states and cities can't supercede their federal shenanigans, a tactic they've used increasingly in recent years, revealing once again what hypocrites they are. And I'm sure the money is rolling in from the usual suspects, and Dems are trying to figure out how to screw US without appearing to want to screw us.

Integrity is challenging, and not the stuff of politicians.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.