RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Funes writes: "Navajo Nation member Mario Atencio has seen the ways oil and gas can divide people. His cousins work for the industry out in New Mexico, and his grandmother lives in the unincorporated town of Counselor, not far from Chaco Canyon in the northwest corner of the state."

Dakota Access protesters. (photo: Mom's Clean Air Force)
Dakota Access protesters. (photo: Mom's Clean Air Force)


For Native People, Fighting Trump's Repeal of Fracking Regulations Is Personal

By Yessenia Funes, Earther

26 January 18

 

avajo Nation member Mario Atencio has seen the ways oil and gas can divide people. His cousins work for the industry out in New Mexico, and his grandmother lives in the unincorporated town of Counselor, not far from Chaco Canyon in the northwest corner of the state.

Now, Atencio sits on the board of Diné CARE, a Navajo-led environmental organization, which is suing the Trump administration for its repeal of an Obama-era fracking rule, which would have implemented better protections for people like Atencio’s grandmother.

This region, as well as the state’s southwest corner, sees the highest concentration of drilling for natural gas in New Mexico. Natural gas activity happens to fall near the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation, as well as the Pueblo of Zuni, the Pueblo of Laguna, and the Mescalero Reservation. Former President Barack Obama tried to provide these groups—as well as everyone else who lives on or near public or tribal lands within the United States—with more transparency surrounding the hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) process used to extract the region’s natural gas, but now that effort is being threatened by President Donald Trump.

Under Obama, the Bureau of Land Management passed a fracking rule in 2015 requiring oil and gas companies on public and tribal lands to disclose what chemicals they were using during the drilling process. It also created safeguards against groundwater contamination, by improving well infrastructure and requiring wastewater be stored in tanks instead of pits.

The federal government never got to implement the rule, which was officially repealed by the Trump administration in December. But people aren’t letting Trump off that easily.

Native groups like Diné CARE and Fort Berthold Protectors of Water and Earth Rights, as well as larger environmental groups like the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity, filed a joint lawsuit Wednesday against the administration for this move. So did the state of California.

Both suits are arguing pretty much the same thing: that the repeal was illegal and should be vacated.

“Once again, President Trump and Interior Secretary [Ryan] Zinke didn’t let the law or facts get in their way in their zeal to repeal the 2015 Fracking Rule,” said Attorney General Xavier Becerra, in a press release. “The Interior Department’s own factual record shows that the risks to our health and environment are real.”

Study after study has highlighted the risks that can accompany fracking: groundwater contamination, earthquakes, and unhealthy newborns. Now, this Obama-era rule wasn’t going to protect everyone from potential health threats, but it would have helped protect anyone who lives on or near the millions of acres of public or tribal lands. That includes 56 million acres of Native American land entrusted to the federal government.

“We’re scared that the volatile organic compounds coming from those wells are not being monitored,” said Atencio to Earther.

Fracking wells also give off methane. This greenhouse gas is 30 times more effective at capturing heat than carbon dioxide, making it an even deadlier climate change contributor.

Ultimately, the groups leading the lawsuits aren’t saying fracking must stop. For now, they just want more protections and transparency. Fractracker Alliance, which works with local residents to map oil and gas drilling around the country, has tried to give people that transparency in the past and has researched who bears these impacts across the country.

“These aren’t places that are uninhabited by any means,” said Kirk Jalbert, the manager of community-based research and engagement at Fractracker, to Earther. “In many ways, they are places that have traditionally been considered sacrifice zones for extraction—from historical oil and gas mining, uranium mining, coal mining—that are already marginalized in many ways, and the rules would have protected them from another layer of industry.”

These places can look like the communities Atencio knows, where some choose money and others choose their health. Or like the community living in the Fort Berthold Reservation, where spills related to fracking operations seemingly happen every day, as put by Nicole Donaghy, a member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe who works as a community organizer with the Fort Berthold Protectors of Water and Earth Rights.

“The ultimate goal is to have the [Bureau of Land Management] acknowledge what fracking’s done to these communities and the people living there,” said Donaghy to Earther. “We want them to be aware that there is harm being inflicted on people who live in these communities, and they can’t leave their ancestral lands. They should have the right to clean water, clean air, and clean land.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+7 # dotlady 2018-01-26 23:39
Tribal communities who have suffered so much degradation already should have the right to cleanups of land and water, and no more invasions by industries. Many middle class or poor Americans cannot afford to leave their homes either. Both groups are being sacrificed to the gas and oil industries as part of a posturing by America to rule the world by making Russia bankrupt itself trying to match the mostly inflated promise of the shale boom, before becoming bankrupt itself.
 
 
+3 # ddd-rrr 2018-01-27 09:30
Thanks, Yessenia Funes, for writing this important article -- and to Earther and RSN
for publishing it. It is astonishing to me how far fossil-fuel "recovery" efforts
are taken to supply the means by which we (life on Earth) may ALL
be eventually destroyed unless we change our ways.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN