RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Excerpt: "President Trump revealed highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in a White House meeting last week, according to current and former U.S. officials, who said Trump's disclosures jeopardized a critical source of intelligence on the Islamic State."

U.S. president Donald Trump (right) and Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov meet in the Oval Office for talks on May 10. (photo: Aleksandr Shcherbak/TASS)
U.S. president Donald Trump (right) and Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov meet in the Oval Office for talks on May 10. (photo: Aleksandr Shcherbak/TASS)

ALSO SEE: Trump Says He Has 'Absolute Right' to Share Info With Russians

Trump Revealed Highly Classified Information to Russian Foreign Minister and Ambassador

By Greg Miller and Greg Jaffe, The Washington Post

16 May 17


resident Trump revealed highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in a White House meeting last week, according to current and former U.S. officials, who said Trump’s disclosures jeopardized a critical source of intelligence on the Islamic State.

The information the president relayed had been provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government, officials said.

The partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russia, and officials said Trump’s decision to do so endangers cooperation from an ally that has access to the inner workings of the Islamic State. After Trump’s meeting, senior White House officials took steps to contain the damage, placing calls to the CIA and the National Security Agency.

“This is code-word information,” said a U.S. official familiar with the matter, using terminology that refers to one of the highest classification levels used by American spy agencies. Trump “revealed more information to the Russian ambassador than we have shared with our own allies.”

The revelation comes as the president faces rising legal and political pressure on multiple Russia-related fronts. Last week, he fired FBI Director James B. Comey in the midst of a bureau investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Moscow. Trump’s subsequent admission that his decision was driven by “this Russia thing” was seen by critics as attempted obstruction of justice.

One day after dismissing Comey, Trump welcomed Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak — a key figure in earlier Russia controversies — into the Oval Office. It was during that meeting, officials said, that Trump went off script and began describing details of an Islamic State terrorist threat related to the use of laptop computers on aircraft.

For almost anyone in government, discussing such matters with an adversary would be illegal. As president, Trump has broad authority to declassify government secrets, making it unlikely that his disclosures broke the law.

White House officials involved in the meeting said Trump discussed only shared concerns about terrorism.

“The president and the foreign minister reviewed common threats from terrorist organizations to include threats to aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser, who participated in the meeting. “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

McMaster reiterated his statement in a subsequent appearance at the White House on Monday and described the Washington Post story as “false,” but did not take any questions.

In their statements, White House officials emphasized that Trump had not discussed specific intelligence sources and methods, rather than addressing whether he had disclosed information drawn from sensitive sources.

The CIA declined to comment, and the NSA did not respond to requests for comment.

But officials expressed concern about Trump’s handling of sensitive information as well as his grasp of the potential consequences. Exposure of an intelligence stream that has provided critical insight into the Islamic State, they said, could hinder the United States’ and its allies’ ability to detect future threats.

“It is all kind of shocking,” said a former senior U.S. official who is close to current administration officials. “Trump seems to be very reckless and doesn’t grasp the gravity of the things he’s dealing with, especially when it comes to intelligence and national security. And it’s all clouded because of this problem he has with Russia.”

In his meeting with Lavrov, Trump seemed to be boasting about his inside knowledge of the looming threat. “I get great intel. I have people brief me on great intel every day,” the president said, according to an official with knowledge of the exchange.

Trump went on to discuss aspects of the threat that the United States learned only through the espionage capabilities of a key partner. He did not reveal the specific intelligence-gathering method, but he described how the Islamic State was pursuing elements of a specific plot and how much harm such an attack could cause under varying circumstances. Most alarmingly, officials said, Trump revealed the city in the Islamic State’s territory where the U.S. intelligence partner detected the threat.

The Post is withholding most plot details, including the name of the city, at the urging of officials who warned that revealing them would jeopardize important intelligence capabilities.

“Everyone knows this stream is very sensitive, and the idea of sharing it at this level of granularity with the Russians is troubling,” said a former senior U.S. counterterrorism official who also worked closely with members of the Trump national security team. He and others spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the subject.

The identification of the location was seen as particularly problematic, officials said, because Russia could use that detail to help identify the U.S. ally or intelligence capability involved. Officials said the capability could be useful for other purposes, possibly providing intelligence on Russia’s presence in Syria. Moscow would be keenly interested in identifying that source and perhaps disrupting it.

Russia and the United States both regard the Islamic State as an enemy and share limited information about terrorist threats. But the two nations have competing agendas in Syria, where Moscow has deployed military assets and personnel to support President Bashar al-Assad.

“Russia could identify our sources or techniques,” the senior U.S. official said.

A former intelligence official who handled high-level intelligence on Russia said that given the clues Trump provided, “I don’t think that it would be that hard [for Russian spy services] to figure this out.”

At a more fundamental level, the information wasn’t the United States’ to provide to others. Under the rules of espionage, governments — and even individual agencies — are given significant control over whether and how the information they gather is disseminated, even after it has been shared. Violating that practice undercuts trust considered essential to sharing secrets.

The officials declined to identify the ally but said it has previously voiced frustration with Washington’s inability to safeguard sensitive information related to Iraq and Syria.

“If that partner learned we’d given this to Russia without their knowledge or asking first, that is a blow to that relationship,” the U.S. official said.

Trump also described measures the United States has taken or is contemplating to counter the threat, including military operations in Iraq and Syria, as well as other steps to tighten security, officials said.

The officials would not discuss details of those measures, but the Department of Homeland Security recently disclosed that it is considering banning laptops and other large electronic devices from carry-on bags on flights between Europe and the United States. The United States and Britain imposed a similar ban in March affecting travelers passing through airports in 10 Muslim-majority countries.

Trump cast the countermeasures in wistful terms. “Can you believe the world we live in today?” he said, according to one official. “Isn’t it crazy?”

Lavrov and Kislyak were also accompanied by aides.

A Russian photographer took photos of part of the session that were released by the Russian state-owned Tass news agency. No U.S. news organization was allowed to attend any part of the meeting.

Senior White House officials appeared to recognize quickly that Trump had overstepped and moved to contain the potential fallout. Thomas P. Bossert, assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, placed calls to the directors of the CIA and the NSA, the services most directly involved in the intelligence-sharing arrangement with the partner.

One of Bossert’s subordinates also called for the problematic portion of Trump’s discussion to be stricken from internal memos and for the full transcript to be limited to a small circle of recipients, efforts to prevent sensitive details from being disseminated further or leaked.

White House officials defended Trump. “This story is false,” said Dina Powell, deputy national security adviser for strategy. “The president only discussed the common threats that both countries faced.”

But officials could not explain why staff members nevertheless felt it necessary to alert the CIA and the NSA.

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said he would rather comment on the revelations in the Post story after “I know a little bit more about it,” but added: “Obviously, they are in a downward spiral right now and have got to figure out a way to come to grips with all that’s happening. And the shame of it is, there’s a really good national security team in place.”

Corker also said, “The chaos that is being created by the lack of discipline is creating an environment that I think makes — it creates a worrisome environment.”

Trump has repeatedly gone off-script in his dealings with high-ranking foreign officials, most notably in his contentious introductory conversation with the Australian prime minister earlier this year. He has also faced criticism for seemingly lax attention to security at his Florida retreat, Mar-a-Lago, where he appeared to field preliminary reports of a North Korea missile launch in full view of casual diners.

U.S. officials said that the National Security Council continues to prepare multi-page briefings for Trump to guide him through conversations with foreign leaders, but that he has insisted that the guidance be distilled to a single page of bullet points — and often ignores those.

“He seems to get in the room or on the phone and just goes with it, and that has big downsides,” the second former official said. “Does he understand what’s classified and what’s not? That’s what worries me.”

Lavrov’s reaction to the Trump disclosures was muted, officials said, calling for the United States to work more closely with Moscow on fighting terrorism.

Kislyak has figured prominently in damaging stories about the Trump administration’s ties to Russia. Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, was forced to resign just 24 days into the job over his contacts with Kislyak and his misleading statements about them. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was forced to recuse himself from matters related to the FBI’s Russia investigation after it was revealed that he had met and spoke with Kislyak, despite denying any contact with Russian officials during his confirmation hearing.

“I’m sure Kislyak was able to fire off a good cable back to the Kremlin with all the details” he gleaned from Trump, said the former U.S. official who handled intelligence on Russia.

The White House readout of the meeting with Lavrov and Kislyak made no mention of the discussion of a terrorist threat.

“Trump emphasized the need to work together to end the conflict in Syria,” the summary said. The president also “raised Ukraine” and “emphasized his desire to build a better relationship between the United States and Russia.” your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+8 # Carol R 2017-05-16 09:31
Quote" “I get great intel. I have people brief me on great intel every day,” the president said, according to an official with knowledge of the exchange."

Trump just wanted to brag. He has no idea of the damage he can do. He is destroying our country both domestically and internationally .

Here is a very interesting U-tube video:

David Pakman shows how typical Trump bluster could actually be indicative of something more problematic. He compares old footage of Trump to the Trump of today, and looks at how Trump's physical problems may also be linked to Alzheimer's:

Is Trump Suffering from Dementia?
David Pakman Show

Published on Mar 30, 2017
--Donald Trump's forgetfulness, and uses of filler words and non-specific nouns, correlate with the early signs of Alzheimer's disease observed in Ronald Regan
+10 # ddd-rrr 2017-05-16 09:55
Things related to Trump just get worse with the passing of time...

Maybe someday, possibly before some horrendously destructive
"presidential mistake" happens, we will remove this colossal jerk
from office (and maybe save the country from destruction) -- BUT,
then there's Pence, someone who would likely be a far more
competent president, but one whose heart would
definitely not be "in the right place"!

+7 # mmc 2017-05-16 10:14
trump did not create a "worrisome environment": he created a catastrophe. Forget about the impeachment process, just physically remove this idiot from our White House. He is at best a mentally unstable moron, strutting around likes he's on stupid reality TV, at worst he is a traitorous criminal.
-1 # spercepolnes 2017-05-16 19:07
Quoting mmc:
trump did not create a "worrisome environment": he created a catastrophe. Forget about the impeachment process, just physically remove this idiot from our White House. He is at best a mentally unstable moron, strutting around likes he's on stupid reality TV, at worst he is a traitorous criminal.

As such, he should fit in with everyone else in and connected to the US government and power structure - it's just that he's an "outsider" and must be removed at all costs, then the US government (which doesn't represent the people) can get back to quietly f**king over the world!
+4 # Anonymot 2017-05-16 11:37
Media on which we used to count for unbiased positions like the New York Times, Atlantic, WaPo, etc. have all become sources that can't be trusted, which is a far more disastrous event than Trump "allegedly" via the WaPo maybe, possibly, and reportedly according to anonymous "officials" passing information of some, perhaps, military information to an authority of a nation that is actively helping us fight our real enemy - ISIS/al Qaida as opposed to our Deep State "enemy" Syria.

This intellectual trap of fake, supposed, and maybe even true news comes from a propaganda machine that any dictator would have dreamed of. Who would have thought this factory of Maybe..., But... would be the property of our once-liberal Democrats, our last President and our last failed Pretender to the Throne.

That the Republicans would be the Keeper of the fake news, yes, that's what Republicans do, but our Democrats!?

Our governments have cried Wolf! and false Fire! so many times in the last 30 years that they are uncountable, but what they clearly tell us is that the public understanding of the rattlesnake in the grass is that she lost and the other viper now rules, hysteria reigns and sits on the royal throne with the scepter of code worded Fire! and neither he nor his fear-trembling, panic stricken opponents can be trusted to tell us anything true and/or honest.

America's brains have been carefully cleaned and all good, intelligent, or nonconformist has been chucked out.
+6 # wrknight 2017-05-16 12:26
I hate to say this but unfortunately, Trump, as president, is the ultimate classification authority and can classify or declassify whatever information he chooses. Secondly, there's the question of whether the laptop threat information ever should have been classified. Maybe the source or means of obtaining the information is sensitive, (which is doubtful) but I see no reason why information about the threat should be kept secret.

Having said that, I have to agree with everyone else here that Trump is an embarrassment and a disaster, but there's more than enough crap to hang Trump on and that's what people should be concerned about.
+2 # lfeuille 2017-05-16 17:54
He shared info on ISIS with a country on the front lines against ISIS. In this cases Trump is right. It has appropriate and he had a right to do it. This is not a scandal. RSN is depending too much on the scaremongers at WaPo lately.
+1 # ericlipps 2017-05-18 04:56
This has gone far beyond the Washington Post. The left shouldn't join in the right's "blame the media" scam.
+2 # futhark 2017-05-16 17:58
Mr. Trump has suggested that Edward Snowden be liable for the death penalty for making classified information available to the public. Mr. Trump's considerable business investments in Russia present him with opportunities to increase their potential value by giving the Russian government certain advantages, in this case access to classified information.

Not only is he in violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution, but he appears to have used government secrets in trade for enriching himself personally.

If Mr. Snowden should be subject to being killed as a punishment for revelations done in the spirit of promoting the public's awareness of how our government is functioning, one can only reasonably expect that following his impeachment and removal from office, Mr. Trump would be subject to at a minimum a 35 year prison sentence, such as was imposed on Chelsea Manning.
0 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2017-05-16 20:43
"The partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russia, and officials said Trump’s decision to do so endangers cooperation from an ally"

The Wapo is too much. About 15 years ago, the Columbia Journalism Review did a study of stories based on "officials told . . ." and concluded that in about half the cases the information was simply made up. Probably now in the era of "fake news" about 90% of stories like this one are just made up.

So when did it happen that some partner has the power to tell a US president what he can do or not do. If the partner does not like it, he/she/it can go away. Who is this partner anyway. Is it ISIS or al Qaeda. Or the Israelis? With partners like this, the war in Syria will never be brought to an end. Only by working with the Russians and Syrians (Assad) can ISIS and al Qaeda be defeated. But that would also mean the defeat of the Obama/Clinton policy, so that is why the Wapo is so upset.
0 # Johnny 2017-05-17 11:11
All the warmongering hysteria by the deep state and its media, such as the Washington Post and New York Times, is purely a distraction from the real evils of Trump's regime (and Obomber's and Bush's): war crimes, the inequitable distribution of wealth and opportunity, sponsorship of terrorism, endless war to promote the expansion of Israel.
-1 # Shaas 2017-05-19 19:27
So the President gives "highly classified information" to finish off the Islamic State - an organisation that openly kills foreign reporters, practices slavery, and propagates rapes of "non-believers" - and the Democrats and other warmongers are upset and cry impeachment.
Pure shizophrenia. Or... politics as usual.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.