RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Kasperkevic writes: "The top 1% of Americans are finally recovering from the great recession. A new analysis of IRS data revealed that the average income of the top 1% of income earners grew by 7.7% in 2015, reaching $1.36m."

Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: AP)
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: AP)

The 1% Are Recovering From 2008 Recession While 99% Are Still Waiting

By Jana Kasperkevic, Guardian UK

07 July 16


In 2015, the income of the 99% grew by just 3.9% – ‘the best real income growth in 17 years’ – while the rich saw growth was twice that at 7.7%

he top 1% of Americans are finally recovering from the great recession. A new analysis of IRS data revealed that the average income of the top 1% of income earners grew by 7.7% in 2015, reaching $1.36m.

Report author Emmanuel Saez, an economics professor at the University of California-Berkeley, calculated earlier this year that the top 1% had an average income of $1.26m in 2014. And though the world’s wealthiest were able to raise that income to $1.36m within one year, they are still not making as much as they were just before the 2008 recession.

Saez revealed that in 2015, the rich were also taking home larger chunk of the US income. “The share of income going to the top 10% of income earners – those making on average about $300,000 a year – increased to 50.5% in 2015 from 50.0% in 2014, the highest ever except for 2012,” Saez wrote.

“The share of income going to the top 1% of families – those earning on average about $1.4m a year – increased to 22% in 2015 from 21.4% in 2014.”

According to him, while the 1% power ahead and continue to reclaim income lost during the recession, a full recovery for the bottom 99% remains elusive. “Six years after the end of the Great Recession, those families have recovered only about 60% of their income losses due to that severe economic downturn,” he said.

It should not come as a shock that to many Americans talk of economic recovery rings hollow. The top 1% of families saw their income grow by 37% between 2009 to 2015, from $990,000 to $1.36m. The incomes of the other 99%, however, grew by just 7.6% during that time – from $45,300 in 2009 to $48,800 in 2015.

In 2015, the income of the 99% grew by just 3.9%. After factoring in inflation, Saez calls it: “the best real income growth in 17 years”. And the rich? At 7.7%, their growth was twice that.

Economy remains a top concern for US voters, according to a recent Gallup survey of 1,530 adults. More than 90% of them said that economy was extremely important to them and 89% of them said the same of jobs and employment.

The income inequality has not escaped the attention of the Obama White House or those vying to succeed him.

“Inequality is still too high,” Barack Obama said in June while speaking about the US economy in Elkhart, Indiana. “The gap between rich and poor is bigger now than it’s been just about any time since the 1920s.”

For much of his two-term presidency, Obama has been pushing the US Congress to raise the federal minimum wage in hopes that it would raise incomes of the poorest Americans. Both former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, who are running for president as Democrats, have pushed for higher minimum wage and spoken about income inequality on the campaign trail.

The uneven recovery is one of the reasons that experts say this presidential election cycle has seen the rise of Donald Trump and a contentious race for the Democratic nomination. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+12 # opinionaire 2016-07-07 09:09
I have to protest the designation of "earners" for this group. Do they actually produce a product, pave a road, do any of the actual labor associated with being paid? How many are just sucking money from their piles of money placed to gather money, too often at the expense of those who actually EARN their livings?
+4 # tswhiskers 2016-07-07 09:19
Most Americans have been aware for many years of the income gap. I daresay most Americans were well aware of it long before it ever came to the notice of the media or the political elite. Job losses here in the U.S. have been occurring since the 1990's; at the same time CEO pay raises were skyrocketing by taking all that unpaid overhead into their own pockets. No one knows how to remedy this situation, and it appears that few really want to. I would guess that as long as the "middle" and lower classes are content to complain and to support such humanitarians as Trump for the presidency, that the upper echelons in the media and politics will consider their jobs of informing the public and adding to the public good as jobs well done. (Feel free to do a raspberry at this point).
+3 # Ralph 2016-07-07 12:12
Oh yes! And Clinton, who sat on the board of WalMart whilst they forced US manufacturers to China will be our saving grace. Pass the crack pipe buddy.
+6 # reiverpacific 2016-07-07 10:56
I thought that it was the 1% that CAUSED the bloody recession.
They actually made out like the bandits they truly are, while the rest of us "assumed the position", hands clasped to the nearest tubular support.
+4 # uscitizen 2016-07-07 11:16
It will never change. The 99% as a whole are just stupid. The r's and d's want them that way too. As just one of many examples klobuchar, stabenow and a whole host of D's are voting to overturn Vermont's GMO labeling law in favor of monsanto. D's are corporate whores of the first order and clinton is at the top of the heap. She will sign off on TPP when it comes around and suck the knob of everything on wallstreet when told to. The dnc will never put it on the table for the platform. Funny to me that blacks voted for clinton when rahm emmanuel Chicago's own has his head right up her butt while he hides the murders of blacks to get re-elected. It's voting for your own executioner. The height of black ignorance. The epitome of lies, murder, corruption. And the clintonistas, what fools and rubes. I can't wait to hear their whining after their use as tools is completed. It is what it is and that's all it is. Massive ignorance embedded in a culture.
0 # Ralph 2016-07-07 12:07
Oh yeah! And those racist, hatemongering, global warming denying baboons in the GOP that are voting for Trump are regular rocket scientists.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.