RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Lemonick writes: "Some of the radioactive material that escaped the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor in 2011 took a form no one was looking for, scientists have discovered. Now they have to figure out what it means for Japan and for future disasters."

A Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) employee, wearing a protective suit and a mask, walks in front of the No. 1 reactor building at TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. (photo: Toru Hanai/Bloomberg)
A Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) employee, wearing a protective suit and a mask, walks in front of the No. 1 reactor building at TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. (photo: Toru Hanai/Bloomberg)

Scientists Find New Kind of Fukushima Fallout

By Sam Lemonick, Forbes

01 July 16


ome of the radioactive material that escaped the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor in 2011 took a form no one was looking for, scientists have discovered. Now they have to figure out what it means for Japan and for future disasters.

Radioactive cesium—specifically, cesium-137—is one of the waste products of nuclear power. It’s also one of the most dangerous substances in a nuclear disaster like Chernobyl or Fukushima.

One reason why is that the type of radiation it emits is particularly damaging to our bodies. Another is that cesium-137 dissolves in water. That means it can spread quickly through the environment and get into the plants, animal and water we consume.

Until now, scientists and disaster experts thought cesium-137 fallout from the Fukushima reactor meltdown was in this soluble form. That guided their cleanup efforts, like removing and washing topsoil, and helped them map where radiation might spread.

It turns out that wasn’t entirely true. Satoshi Utsunomiya, a geochemist at Kyushu University in Japan, announced over the weekend that he had found cesium-137 in a new form: trapped inside tiny glass particles that spewed from the damaged reactors. These particles are not water soluble, meaning we know very little about how they behave in the environment—or in our bodies. He found the particles in air filters placed around Tokyo at the time of the disaster.

According to Utsunomiya, high temperatures inside the malfunctioning reactors at the Fukushima plant melted and broke down the concrete and metal in the buildings. Silica, zinc, iron, oxygen and cesium-137 fused into millimeter-wide glass microparticles, each about the size of a pin’s head. Lifted into the atmosphere by the fires raging at the plant, they then blew about 240 kilometers southeast to Tokyo.

“As much as 89% of all of the cesium [in Tokyo] was in fact in these particles. It’s profound,” says Daniel Kaplan, a geochemist at Savannah River National Laboratory in South Carolina. He attended Utsunomiya’s lecture describing the findings at the ongoing Goldschmidt Conference in Yokohama, Japan.

Kaplan says similar particles were observed near the Chernobyl reactors after the explosion there in 1986. But they were only seen within about 30 kilometers; beyond that, cesium-137 was only observed in rain.

The discovery could change how we model fallout from nuclear disasters. Kaplan explains that it might add a new variable to the models we use to predict where radioactive particles will go and how long they’ll stay there. It might also change how we treat cesium-137 during cleanup and monitoring.

It is probably still too early to say what this means for people living in Tokyo or elsewhere in Japan. Kaplan thinks the amount of radiation they received probably hasn’t changed. Whether they got it from water-soluble cesium-137 or from these particles, the radiation dose was the same—and for Tokyo residents, that number was within the margin of safe exposure.

The bad thing about water-soluble cesium-137 is that it can easily get into our bodies from soil by way of plants and animals. This new discovery alleviates that concern. But it opens up a new possibility we know little about.

“If the particles are in the air—because that’s how they get to Tokyo—then when you are aspirating this air you should find them in some ways on your lungs,” says Bernd Grambow, who studies nuclear waste chemistry as head of the SUBATECH laboratory in France.

Water-soluble cesium-137 that makes it into our lungs passes into the bloodstream and is peed out within a few weeks. But Grambow says we really don’t know what happens to insoluble cesium-137-containing particles if they get in our lungs. Some of them are likely coughed out or removed by our lungs’ other normal processes. As for the rest, Grambow says we don’t know how long they might remain.

He cautions that any internal radiation from particles containing cesium-137 would be much less than the doses people got from external radiation, which would come from cesium-137 and other radioactive elements in the soil or the environment around them. “We don’t know very much, and my point is only that they should be studied,” Grambow says.

Utsunomiya’s next step is finding out how much of the cesium-137 that ended up in soils in Tokyo and elsewhere was in these glass particles. That way, researchers will be able to better understand how cesium made its way out of the reactor and into the environment. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+33 # angelfish 2016-07-01 22:15
Resign yourselves, folks. There is NO help, NO cure, and NO ONE able to fix this fatal contamination of our Planet. If it keeps on happening, as it surely will, "Adios, Muchachos". Ignorance is bliss and the beat DOES go on.
+13 # Vardoz 2016-07-02 13:41
I produced and directed a documentary that aired nationally on PBS about the impact of uranium mining on American Indians and whites in the Southwestern US. Uranium companies only use 1% of the ore. The rest, millions of tons of uranium low level radioactive waste, that looks like sand, is and has been left on the earth uncovered next to rivers, schools and shopping centers. If one particle gets into your lung it's like getting a continual x-ray and eventually causes cancer. I imagine this is what happens when the cesium in glass lodges in the lung. Glass does not stop the radiation from affecting the tissue around it. Bottom line it was suicide building all these reactors on a major fault. Really stupid. This radiation will circulate around the world through the oceans, it will evaporate into the air and rain down on food and be eaten by fish and animals and us. It will bring death to all living things for thousands of years. We should not be using radioactive substances to boil water. It is too dangerous to life on Earth.
+55 # Spence 2016-07-01 22:41
The more we learn about the extreme dangers of using nuclear energy, the more we should reject its use in place of fossil fuels. We should stop wasting our time and go straight to the task at hand; conversion to wind and solar power.
+19 # MissMarple 2016-07-02 06:06
Yes, yes, and yes. They know now they are killing us, but they just keep going. We must outlaw these ground based bombs.
+8 # ericlane 2016-07-02 08:18
FK nuclear power!
+2 # shraeve 2016-07-02 08:26
The article assumes there will be nuclear disasters in the future. Can we avoid that?
+6 # Karlus58 2016-07-02 12:43
Well...have we been able to avoid them? It's obvious we haven't. It's a resounding NO.
+7 # GravityWave 2016-07-02 13:24
The US has OLD nuclear plants sitting on faults. If one of these should blow and start a chain reaction of earthquakes we could have our very nuclear disaster. That's before we get to talking about Russia, Iran, Saudis, the Middle East, and all the total bat-s t-crazies on earth.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.