RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Steiger writes: "A lawmaker in Kansas is seeking to criminalize the distribution of 'harmful' materials to minors in schools, lifting an exemption for teachers using approved materials."

Jail time for 'harmful' teaching materials? (photo: Corbis)
Jail time for 'harmful' teaching materials? (photo: Corbis)

Kansas Bill Could Send Teachers to Jail for Six Months for Teaching "Harmful" Materials

By Kay Steiger, ThinkProgress

26 February 15


lawmaker in Kansas is seeking to criminalize the distribution of “harmful” materials to minors in schools, lifting an exemption for teachers using approved materials. Advocates working against the bill worry it will have a “chilling” effect on teachers in the state.

“It’s purely a reaction to this instance of this one particular sex ed poster,” said Micah Kubic, of the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas, who testified against the bill. “This poster must be the most impactful poster in the history of the poster.”

The text-only poster, displayed in Hocker Grove Middle School in Shawnee, Kansas, in 2014 was titled, “How Do People Express Their Sexual Feelings?” and included the words “hugging,” “grinding” and “anal sex.” Kubic said the bill is unnecessary. “The teacher who put that up was disciplined by the school almost immediately after that parent complained,” he said.

“There was a list of sexual acts, some of which were highly offensive,” Sen. Mary Pilcher-Cook told KMBC 9 News. Pilcher-Cook previously introduced a bill that would criminalize surrogate parenting, saying “you are creating a child purposely that you know is not going to have a biological mother.”

The bill would criminalize displaying material to minors that is “harmful,” including “any description, exhibition, presentation or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement or sadomasochistic abuse when the material or performance.” The bill looks likely to pass the state Senate this week, and carries a penalty of up to six months in jail. Kansas already has a law that protects minors from “harmful” material, mainly to prevent adults from distributing pornography to minors. As it is written now, the law includes an exemption for teachers, but this bill aims to remove that exemption. Pilcher-Cook has not yet responded to ThinkProgress’ requests for comment.

ACLU Kansas and teachers worry that the language is overly broad, and that teachers could be targeted for things that are part of a normal curriculum, including books with sexual or controversial themes like Huckleberry Finn. A lesson an anatomy, say, might be dicey for a biology teacher, or an art history class could be scrubbed because some of the content included nudes.

Marcus Baltzell, communications director at the Kansas National Education Association, warned that teachers already worry about the effect. “One person’s objection about something is now putting a blanket of silence, a blanket of censorship over an entire state. Is that what we want?”

“It makes me feel like I need to self-censor,” Baltzell, who is a certified teacher, said. “Now I have to consider anything that would have any kind of text or imagery or anything that would be remotely questionable by say one individual I can be brought up on charges for that.”

Baltzell pointed out that there are already rigorous standards in place to deal with parents who object to materials presented by teachers. “This is a solution in search of a problem,” he said.

Another bill inspired by the poster that inspired the “harmful” materials bill would require schoolchildren to “opt in” to sex ed rather than “opt out.” Baltzell, though he didn’t comment on the details of the state’s sex ed program, did note that an opt in standard is harmful. “We think that’s difficult and dangerous for the child who needs this education but doesn’t have that same active and involved parent that another student does,” he said.

According to the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, Kansas’ statewide curriculum already prescribes “a complete program of abstinence until marriage in human sexuality that is developmentally appropriate, including information about sexually transmitted diseases, especially HIV/AIDS.” Research has shown that students educated in an abstinence-only environment tend to have sex earlier and more often than students educated with more comprehensive materials.

ACLU Kansas’ Kubic pointed out that there are only three other states that currently have “opt in” requirements. “We’ll be going in the wrong direction,” he said. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+40 # ChrisCurrie 2015-02-26 10:45
I think it is the "screw your neighbor" attitudes of Kansas state legislators that are the most obscene!
+48 # mim 2015-02-26 10:50
How long will it be before this practice is extended to teachers of other subjects, e.g. jailing history teachers who don't toe the right-wing line?
+30 # myungbluth 2015-02-26 17:06
No "materials" are as harmful as ignorance. We only need look at Kansas to see point in fact.
+24 # stannadel 2015-02-26 11:09
When I taught at a rural university in Oklahoma, just south of Kansas, some 20 years ago, a local middle school teacher told me that her students were scheduling appointments with each other for anal sex (to preserve the girls' "virginity"). So the poster strikes me as belonging to the real world of prairie state middle schools as opposed to the naive idealized view that these are simply innocent children who need to be protected from such ideas.
+41 # Buddha 2015-02-26 11:38
And once again Conservatives sound like a bearded Taliban Imam.
+30 # Citizen Mike 2015-02-26 12:17
Why is it not made more clear and widely known that objection to sex ed in high school, the antiabortion campaign, restrictions on contraceptives, and resistance to marriage equality are all on one thread? That thread is fear and hatred of sexual behavior of any kind: social conservatives cannot accept any kind of sexual behavior and fear sexual desire. They are terrified of their own bodies! And hate anyone who does not share their fear!

They are Orwell's Anti-Sex League in 1984, going door-to-door asking people to sign a celibacy pledge. We should publicly call them out for what they are: ANTI-SEX REPUBLICANS. Since most people want to have sex,this will impair the Republican Party's appeal to voters everywhere.
+6 # RCW 2015-02-26 13:56
The text-only poster, displayed in Hocker 'Grove Middle School in Shawnee, Kansas, in 2014 was titled, “How Do People Express Their Sexual Feelings?” and included the words “hugging,” “grinding” and “anal sex.”'

Looks like a clash of extremes. The great danger of such legislation, as an earlier commenter noted, is that it could be applied to political and other non-tangible issues.
The teacher's judgment, which I believe to be poor in this matter, assumes an implied approval of all these behaviors at that age and that they are all widespread, ergo join the group. What I am missing is even the suggestion that both love and sex are more than biology and mechanics.
+13 # Dust 2015-02-26 14:46
Really? They will be sent to jail for teaching Intelligent Design, white-washed US history, math and science?
+5 # lfeuille 2015-02-26 18:12
Quoting Dust:
Really? They will be sent to jail for teaching Intelligent Design, white-washed US history, math and science?

Alas, no. They get to define what is "harmful".
+21 # ericlipps 2015-02-26 19:07
I can see it now: before long, the Kansas legislature will decide that "harmful materials" include anything that says the world is more than 6,000 years old. The lawyers are going to have a field day.
+14 # RMDC 2015-02-27 06:12
Stay the fuck out of Kansas.
+14 # mmcmanus 2015-02-27 14:48
Such an interesting irony: Dorothy--"we're not in Kansas any more Toto"--went from Kansas to Oz, and now Kansas has turned into OZ, where the government is a pathetic old white man behind a curtain.
0 # chinaski 2015-02-28 09:17
There's no place like home
There's no place like home
There's no place like home

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.