RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Daly writes: "James Elmer Mitchell and John Bruce Jessen are not the first Americans to employ waterboarding and other 'enhanced interrogation techniques' against our enemies. But they are almost certainly the only ones to get rich doing it."

 (photo: Elena Scotti/The Daily Beast)
(photo: Elena Scotti/The Daily Beast)

The Palaces That Torture Built

By Michael Daly, The Daily Beast

14 December 14


The CIA paid torture teachers James Mitchell and Bruce Jesser more than $80 million. As they now live out their wildest dreams, their barbarity has cost the U.S. far more.

all them the houses that torture built: Two sprawling luxury homes purchased by the CIA-contracted psychologists at the center of the scathing Senate report.

James Elmer Mitchell and John Bruce Jessen are not the first Americans to employ waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” against our enemies. 

But they are almost certainly the only ones to get rich doing it.

They did so by employing what is widely dismissed as “voodoo science” based on misapplied principles in a program that CIA records suggest produced little, if any, intelligence of significant value.

And they might have gotten even richer. The Senate Intelligence Committee report says they secured a contract with the CIA in 2006 valued “in excess of $180 million.”

The CIA canceled the deal three years later, but by then the duo had received $81 million. They had more than enough to build fabulous new domiciles that surely at least equal their wildest dreams.

Mitchell’s pied a torture is in Florida. Records describe a waterfront residence on six-tenths of an acre and appraised at more than $880,000, with 4,233 square feet of living space, four bathrooms, a three-car garage, a pool, central air-conditioning, and a wooded walkway leading to a lakeside combination dock and gazebo.

Jessen’s is in the state of Washington, situated on 15 acres and appraised at $1,599,900. Records describe this house as 6,916 square feet, with six bedrooms and eight bathrooms. An aerial image shows what appears to be a spa, roiling water apparently carrying no nasty connotations.

“We are proud of the work we have done for our country,” Mitchell and Jessen have said in a joint statement.

The Senate report notes that in addition to the $81 million, the CIA accorded the two a “multi-year indemnification agreement” to shield them, their firm, and its employees from any “legal liability arising out of the program.”

“The CIA has since paid out more than $1 million pursuant to the agreement,” the report notes.

By comparison, a number of American officers who employed what was essentially waterboarding on Philippine insurgents at the start of the 20th century were hit with court-martials. Most were acquitted by military courts that found the torture justified under the circumstances. But President Theodore Roosevelt made his opinion known by writing a single word on the papers reporting the acquittal of 1st Lt. Edwin Hickman.


In a private letter, Roosevelt said that the Filipinos had long employed the “water care” and that it did not generally inflict lasting damage. He also wrote, “Torture is not a thing that we can tolerate.”

One Philippines case—in which a Catholic priest died after being waterboarded three times—did not even go to trial, despite Judge Advocate General George Davis’ contention that it quite possibly constituted a “felonious homicide.” 

“A resort to torture to obtain either confession or information from a prison of war… is a violation of the laws of war and as such is triable,” Davis said in reviewing the case.

The U.S. Justice Department nonetheless declined to charge the officer who oversaw the torture, a captain named Brownell. Another American officer, Capt. Edwin Glenn, was convicted of cruelty in a non-fatal turn-of-the-century case in the Philippines. He was admonished and fined $50, but allowed to remain in the Army. He is said to have gone on to become a major general.

The U.S. took a more serious view of waterboarding when it was done to Americans in World War II. A number of Japanese soldiers were criminally charged and convicted for waterboarding and otherwise torturing prisoners. The allegations against a Japanese officer who was sentenced to 15 years read in part:

“Did willfully and unlawfully, brutally mistreat and torture… an American prisoner of war, by beating and kicking him; by fastening him on a stretcher and pouring water up his nostrils.”

In a legal history of water-torture cases in the U.S. courts, Evan Wallach cites the testimony of American Capt. Chase Nielson in another such case.

Q: Did the questioners threaten you with any other treatment while you were being questioned?

A: Yes, I was given several types of torture.... I was given what they call the water cure.*

Q: What was your sensation when they were pouring water... what did you physically feel?

A: Well, I felt more or less like I was drowning, just gasping between life and death..

Wallach notes that water torture was also employed by the enemy during the Korean War. He cites an interview that a freed POW, Air Force Lt. Col. William Harrison, gave to The New York Times in 1953.

“They would bend my head back, put a towel over my face and pour water over the towel,” Harrison was quoted as saying. “I could not breathe.... When I would pass out, they would shake me and begin again.”

In an effort to prepare Americans for waterboarding and other forms of torture and abuse, the military created the SERE (Survival Evasion Resistance Escape) program.

As conceived by Army Lt. Col. James “Nick” Rowe, who had been a POW for six years during the Vietnam War, SERE created “enemy” compounds. Role-playing instructors subjected trainees to an approximation of what they might encounter if they were captured by an enemy so cruel and cowardly not to respect the Geneva Conventions.

Each branch of the services established its own SERE program, the Air Force at Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington. The psychologists who served there included two officers, James Elmer Mitchell and John Bruce Jessen.

Mitchell’s doctoral thesis had been about the relation between diet and exercise and hypertension. Jessen’s thesis had been about “family modeling,” or therapy where the patients sculpt figures representing relatives. Neither man seems to have had any experience or training in interrogation, but they were adequately qualified for their most important task, which was to make sure the instructors did not get carried away with their roles as torturers.

By late summer of 2001, and both men had retired as lieutenant colonels, with an eye toward supplementing their modest pensions with private contracting.

Then, not a month after Mitchell left the Air Force, came the 9/11 attacks. He and Jessen convinced a stunned and desperate CIA that they were the ones to run a new interrogation program.

British authorities had earlier raided a suspected terrorist’s home and recovered what was described as an “al Qaeda handbook” that contained some rudimentary advice about resisting interrogation.

Mitchell and Jessen now proposed to “reengineer” the SERE program so that the role-playing was real, but with Americans being the interrogators and terrorists being the subjects.

One hitch in the duo’s concept was that such tortures had generally been used to break the prisoner’s spirit and extract false confessions, not to elicit accurate and actionable intelligence.

Mitchell and Jessen are said to have argued that the “enhanced interrogation techniques” would only be used to reduce the subject to a state of “learned helplessness.” The questioning would come afterward.

Had the CIA bothered to ask around, it would have quickly determined that the concept of “learned helplessness” arose from experiments involving dogs conducted in the 1960s at the University of Pennsylvania with the hope of extrapolating some insight into human depression.

The primary researchers included Dr. Martin Seligman, who would have told the CIA that he had met Mitchell shortly after 9/11 at a small conference about Muslim extremism. Mitchell had effusively complimented Seligman on his work. But Seligman never imagined how Mitchell might put the concept to work, in part because it was so ill-suited to that purpose. Seligman no doubt would have told the CIA back then pretty much what he told The Daily Beast by email this week.

“I have never worked on interrogation; I have never seen an interrogation, and I have only a passing knowledge of the literature on interrogation,” he wrote. “With that qualification, my opinion is that the point of interrogation is to get at the truth, not to get at what the interrogator wants to hear. I think learned helplessness would make someone more passive, less defiant and more compliant, but I know of no evidence that it leads reliably to more truth-telling.”

Seligman added, “I am grieved and horrified that good science, which has helped so many people overcome depression, may have been used for such dubious purposes.”

But the CIA quite literally bought Mitchell and Jessen’s proposal, reportedly at an initial rate of around $1,800 a day, each, tax-free. Mitchell is said to have gone with a CIA team to where Abu Zubaydah, our first big al Qaeda prisoner, was recovering from gunshot wounds suffered when he was captured.

At the time Zubaydah was grabbed, one of his captors had snapped on handcuffs belonging to Port Authority Police Officer Donald McIntyre, who had died at the World Trade Center. Zubaydah was treated by the same rules that would have applied even to a cop killer in America as the FBI began the initial questioning.

One agent in particular developed a rapport with Zubaydah and managed to elicit an all-important bit of intelligence. Zubaydah indentified Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.

Perhaps in part because it was an FBI coup, the CIA stepped in with its high-priced psychologist. Mitchell is said to have taken an active part in the “enhanced” interrogation, thereby becoming the highest paid waterboarder in history.

By most accounts, Zubaydah shut down, marking the first of what the Senate report describes as a series of failures by Mitchell and Jessen. It seems entirely possible that the ”learned helplessness” in other prisoners produced some of the bogus information that led to the fiction about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, thereby making an equally fictive case for invasion.

As recounted by the Senate report, the Mitchell and Jessen program seemed to be proving anew the wisdom of a Japanese manual, Notes for the Interrogation of Prisoners of War, issued in 1943:

“Care must be taken when making use of rebukes, invective, or torture as it will result in his telling falsehoods and make a fool of you,” it says.

Of course, the CIA paid the two psychologists even more, awarding the $180 million contract to the firm they founded, Mitchell, Jessen & Associates. They might have scored all that dough if word of the waterboarding had not leaked. Those who spoke out against it included a fellow Air Force colonel, Lindsay Graham, who also happens to be a U.S. senator.

In his capacity as a reservist with the Air Force Judge Advocate’s Office, Graham co-authored a 2013 paper, titled ”Waterboarding: Issues and Lessons.”

To offer an historical perspective, the report quotes a 17th-century account of the same procedure that Mitchell and Jensen would later be paid a fortune to administer:

“The torturer thrown over his [the victim’s] mouth and nostrils a thin cloth, so that he is scarcely able to breathe thro’ them, and in the mean while a small stream of water like a thread, not drop by drop, falls from on high, upon the mouth of the person lying in this miserable condition, and so easily sinks down the thin cloth to the bottom of his throat, so that there is no possibility of breathing, his mouth being stopped with water and his nostrils with the cloth, so that the poor wretch is in the same agony as persons ready to die, and breathing out their last.”

The Graham report goes on to address the situation more than three centuries later.

“It has been reported that DoD contemplated using waterboarding after the September 11 attacks and that another non-DoD agency did use the technique in a limited manner to gather intelligence regarding a feared second wave of attacks,” the report says. “Waterboarding can inflict severe physical and emotional pain and suffering, and any military or civilian agent of the government who waterboards a detainee would place themselves at risk for prosecution.”

The report goes on to assert, “The humane treatment of enemy personnel in military custody is important for non-legal reasons, too. Since service members are most at risk of being captured during armed conflicts, there is a concern that any maltreatment perpetrated by the United States will create an environment where captured service members may be abused and brutalized as well.”

That exact argument has been made by Graham’s fellow senator, John McCain, who was tortured as a prisoner during the Vietnam War. A civilian corollary was proven when ISIS waterboarded journalist James Foley before beheading him.

The report concludes, “The manner in which the United States treats detainees reflects the values of the nation…. Rather than constrain the defense of the nation, compliance with these legal norms shows America’s true mettle and the strength of its convictions. Torture and barbarity must be rejected even in the face of great adversity.”

Such talk and a paucity of demonstrable successes seem to have prompted the CIA to cancel Mitchell and Jessen’s contract. They still had the $81 million that has to amaze everybody on all sides of the issue.

Jessen was named a Mormon bishop, but the appointment was met with vocal protests. He retains the comfort of his grand new home.

Mitchell has been reported saying that he grew up poor in Florida. He must take particular delight in his own luxurious abode.

Neither man could be reached for comment, but you have to figure they are faring far better than any other waterboarders over the centuries.

And, since they are indemnified, not even the courts can take away those two splendid houses that torture built. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

-6 # wantrealdemocracy 2014-12-14 23:54
This whole article is a pack of lies but does allow us to see just how evil our government is. The CIA did not get the information on who did the attack on the World Trade Center by using torture. The CIA did that evil and treasonous deed. They had the help of top government officials and high level military officers.

The CIA did not have to torture anyone to find where Osama bin Laden was hiding. They knew he had died of kidney failure a year after the murderous attack on American citizens that was done to whip up enthusiasm (and great profits) for endless wars against Muslim nations.

The people of this nation must not let these crimes go unpunished. The rot and corruption in our government must be ended. The people who did these evil deeds must be charged with treason. Found guilty they should be put to death in a public place as a warning to prevent such evil to continue.

We must face the facts and punish the guilty and change our government into something with which we can take pride. Our government now is despicable. We deserve better.
+23 # RMDC 2014-12-15 07:49
The CIA has plenty of taxpayer money to spread around among the people who are willing to do its dirty work. The CIA works like any criminal organization does. It has to pay the people who do its murders, torturers, and other obvious crimes.

When will the US get free from the gangsters at the CIA? It has dragged the US into many wars since its creation. It has overthrown decent governments around the world and created real hell for billions of people.
+1 # jmac9 2014-12-17 13:27
Audit and delete the CIA.

As your tax money pays for them, you should know where your tax money went.

NO secret budgets in a democracy.

Audit and delete the CIA, NSA, DEA, Homeland Security...

As with the banker criminals - prosecute the torturers, jail them, and take their assets...Opps but the attorney general, limp Eric Holder said bankers are too big to jail....
+15 # jwb110 2014-12-15 12:23
If we are not better than are enemies we have no moral high road. Nothing was ever said about the pilots of the 911 planes being Saudis. Where was that war? The Bin Laden family was given free rein to fly home when all American planes had been grounded. Given the Bush/Cheney/Rum sfeld lack of anything to do with war, i.e. not even an exit strategy, torture was inevitable. Colin Powell got thrown under the bus regarding this. He was no favorite of mine but he was the only member of the administration with enough brains to get us out in as timely manner. The top of that administration is guilty of war crimes. Prosecuting them would go a long way to reinstating our place in the family of nations. After all, if the shoe were on the other foot the Bush/Cheney/Rum sfeld would do it to me.
+7 # Marco Luxe 2014-12-15 14:33
Don't be so sure that a CIA indemnification agreement itself can protect these evil charlatans: courts have the power to void such agreements. If there were the political will to do so, these torturers would be made an example of. Sadly, I fear a demoralized democratic party lacks the political will to do anything.
+3 # Stevodevo 2014-12-15 19:37
Seems like the CIA will need to sue these two for malpractice, or at least fraud. If I paid a couple of contractors $80,000,000 I'd expect to get something of value equal or better than what I paid, and the CIA got far less than a fraction of this value.
+2 # Helen Marshall 2014-12-15 20:06
What exactly would you expect the Agency to get?
0 # Stevodevo 2014-12-15 19:37
Seems like the CIA will need to sue these two for malpractice, or at least fraud. If I paid a couple of contractors $80,000,000 I'd expect to get something of value equal or better than what I paid, and the CIA got far less than a fraction of this value.
0 # Stevodevo 2014-12-15 19:37
Seems like the CIA will need to sue these two for malpractice, or at least fraud. If I paid a couple of contractors $80,000,000 I'd expect to get something of value equal or better than what I paid, and the CIA got far less than a fraction of this value.
+4 # Jerome 2014-12-16 15:27
Torture is another action in the long list of actions that put the lie to the concept of compassionate conservatism.
0 # jmac9 2014-12-17 13:34
Hey, CIA is a drug running lying sack of criminality - you can't trust anything they say -
Gary Webb's Dark Alliance repeatedly documents CIA bringing cocaine into the USA to facilitate Reagan's illegal 'Iran-Contra' scam.

America the great hypocrite - preaching freedom and supporting dictatorships that crush freedom's - and the CIA is the operation to do it.
Batista in Cuba, Pinochet Chile, Guatemalan military junta, Mexico, Sam Doe and Charles Taylor, Israel's Apartheid against the Palestinians... and on and on...

Change the politics, change the agenda, at least has an agenda to alter the course of American hypocrisy.
New politic, new candidates, new economy,
0 # Starheart 2014-12-17 14:35
WE ARE LIVING IN NAZI GERMANY ON STEROIDS NOW .... and The US Government is Robbing or Torturing Most People in One Way or Another Now, and Sticking the People with the Bill...


Targeted individuals by Military and Homeland Security Personnel are Being Protected from Prosecution, just like the Torturers, and the IRS personnel involved in targeting Politically Incorrect Citizens & Organizations --- ONLY THE MILITARY AND HOMELAND SECURITY CRIMES, DRUG SMUGGLING, AND BURGLARIES OF TARGETED INDIVIDUALS AND MONITORED ACTIVIST CITIZENS ARE MUCH MORE WIDESPREAD INSIDE THE US BORDERS THAN ANYONE REALIZES.

One man that came up to me, at the Interurban Tukwila Starbucks, close to the SeaTac Homeland Security Bldg, and told me that they had done targeted surveillance burglaries to THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE.

There is more truth behind the Storefront Titled "White House Black Market" than People Really Know...... And it is not just Drug Trafficking either....

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.