RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

McCoy writes: "The settlement comes just over a year after Houston-based Halliburton admitted destroying evidence and agreed to plead guilty to a criminal charge for its role in the oil spill disaster that occurred at a BP (BP) offshore well."

Halliburton admitted destroying evidence. (photo: Gerald Herbert/AP)
Halliburton admitted destroying evidence. (photo: Gerald Herbert/AP)

Halliburton to Pay $1.1B for Destroying Deepwater Horizon Evidence

By Kevin McCoy and Rick Jervis, USA Today

02 September 13


alliburton (HAL) has reached a $1.1 billion agreement aimed at settling most claims filed against the company related to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico, the oil-field services giant said Tuesday.

The settlement comes just over a year after Houston-based Halliburton admitted destroying evidence and agreed to plead guilty to a criminal charge for its role in the oil spill disaster that occurred at an offshore well of British energy giant BP (BP).

The tragedy, the worst offshore oil disaster in U.S. history, killed 11 workers.

Halliburton shares were down fractionally at $67.19 in afternoon trading, recovering from a steeper drop earlier Tuesday.

The settlement, which is subject to approval of a federal court in Louisiana, will be paid into a trust in three installments over the next two years until all appeals have been resolved, Halliburton said. Halliburton had previously accrued $1.3 billion to cover losses related to the disaster litigation.

The company said the agreement covers:

  • Claims against Halliburton stemming from BP's 2012 class-action settlement of claims filed by thousands of individuals and businesses that reported they were damaged by the disaster.

  • Punitive damages claims against Halliburton by plaintiffs who allege damage to property or to the commercial fishing industry in connection with the disaster.

  • Affirmation that Halliburton isn't liable for compensatory damages to the members of the settlement class in BP's 2012 settlement.

Halliburton's tentative settlement is higher than expected — but still tens of billions of dollars less than what BP could potentially pay out for the catastrophe, said Blaine LeCesne, a New Orleans-based Loyola University Law School associate professor who has followed legal proceedings stemming from the disaster.

With the agreement, Halliburton removes itself from future liability regarding legal claims filed on behalf of thousands of fishermen, business owners and others who said their lives and livelihoods were ruined by the spill.

"Halliburton wanted out," said LeCesne. "Since their failed cement mixture is a the epicenter of culpability in this incident, they didn't want to take any further chances."

David Uhlmann, an University of Michigan environmental law professor and former chief of the U.S. Department of Justice's Environmental Crimes Section, said the settlement raises questions about the absence of criminal charges against the company.

"Halliburton did not admit negligence in today's settlement but the fact that they agreed to pay over $1 billion raises anew questions about why the Justice Department did not charge the company criminally for its role in causing the Gulf oil spill," Uhlmann said in an email reply to USA TODAY questions about the settlement.

Starting early next year, Louisiana U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier will preside over a non-jury trial, known as Phase 3 of the Deepwater Horizon proceedings. The trial is expected to determine the relative responsibility of each company responsible for the disaster and its aftermath, which could open the door to tens of billions of dollars in federal fines.

BP still faces $20 to $40 billion in penalties under the federal Clean Water Act and other environmental sanctions and settlements, said LeCesne. The British energy giant has already committed more than $40 billion in earlier settlements, clean-up costs and criminal fines, he said. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+25 # indian weaver 2014-09-02 14:44
Laughable pocket change for Cheney / Halliburton, same as the $11 Billion fines against Jamie Diman's cabal of criminals. Too bad just once, the coward Attorney General doesn't bill these assholes enough to hurt them badly. We The People need some good news, just once would be nice. But no, never any good news, all nightmares courtesy of Obama and dubya etc. Never any help or support for We The People. What are we doing with this so-called government (an umbrella corporate sponsor for banks, Wehrmacht and energy companies, not for We the People). I don't want it around anymore destroying everything and everyone in sight.
+22 # RGV.REG 2014-09-02 22:37
I agree!!!
Why aren't people going to jail for such crimes against humanity???
Isn't it time?
+5 # ritawalpoleague 2014-09-03 01:24
Yep, indian weaver. Once again, you hit the nail on the head.

Must confess, I was not holding my breath when I sent a box the size of a small coffin to the DOJ, full of excellent evidence re. need for full investigation into the cop brutalization and torture of the Colorado Springs 2007 St. Paddy's Parade peace and justice participants. No DOJ investigation proceeded - no big surprise.

Certainly, it's no big surprise that Cheney's Halliburton did not admit negligence, nor that this administrations ' Non-Justice Dept. did not charge the company criminally. Hell's bells, after all, rule of law is now in the toilet, here in this no longer a democracy, broken down and overcome by a coup d'état country of ours.
+5 # Kootenay Coyote 2014-09-03 08:46
They threw the leaflet at Halliburton.
+3 # bmiluski 2014-09-03 09:44
Too little, too late.....
+8 # Thirdeye 2014-09-03 09:50
You are correct, sir. 1 Billion is merely a write off for a company as big and powerful as Halliburton, and none of those responsible suffer any consequences. The only way to discourage crap like this is to throw BP execs in jail.
+10 # reiverpacific 2014-09-03 09:58
This is a kiss on the arse, not even a slap on the wrist.
Rob a Seven-Eleven, go to jail (if you're lucky) or get shot out of hand.
Wantonly help to destroy an ecosystem, get a big tax write-off and no jail even discussed.
What happened to;
"Make the punishment fit the crime
The punishment fit the crime"?
+2 # jsluka 2014-09-03 15:37
I bet they won't actually have to pay this; the usual situation after the announcement of a big corporate fine is that eventually it is massively reduced (usually by about 90%) through appeal and other more secret processes.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.