RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Millhiser reports: "So far this term, the Supreme Court handed down eight cases where the United States Chamber of Commerce filed a brief - and a majority of the justices sided with the Chamber in all but one of these decisions."

(photo: file)
(photo: file)

SCOTUS Ruled in Favor of the Nation's Top Corporate Interest Group in 7 of 8 Cases This Term

By Ian Millhiser, ThinkProgress

13 March 14


o far this term, the Supreme Court handed down eight cases where the United States Chamber of Commerce filed a brief — and a majority of the justices sided with the Chamber in all but one of these decisions. The one outlier decision was a case involving anti-retaliation protections for whistleblowers where the justices votes broke down along unusual lines, with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg writing the majority opinion and Justice Sonia Sotomayor in dissent.

This most recent data is part of an ongoing project by the Constitutional Accountability Center, which scored the Chamber’s “win rate” before the justices going back to 1981. As their data reflects, corporate America got a big boost in the nation’s highest Court shortly after Chief Justice John Roberts (and his conservative colleague Justice Samuel Alito) became justices:

Several Chamber cases remain to be decided this term, including two major environmental cases and an attack on President Obama’s recess appointments power.

CAC’s data also shows a sharp divide between the Court’s conservative bloc and its four more liberal members: your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+4 # Sangze 2014-03-13 17:47
Scotus is owned by Wall Street. Obama has made certain that.
0 # LAellie33 2014-03-16 04:49
I respectfully disagree. Obama has tried to put liberal judges in every position -- With the exception of Sotomayor and Kagan, nominations have been blocked by corporatist, extremist teapartyrepubli cans.
+7 # hwmcadoo 2014-03-14 05:03
No surprises here.
+5 # fredboy 2014-03-14 07:01
Makes sense. Higher speaking fees.
+6 # TJGeezer 2014-03-14 09:36
The U.S. Corporate Supremes, destroying judicial precedent and government of, by and for the people one decision at a time.
+1 # ligonlaw 2014-03-14 10:00
The far right wing of the Supreme Court are money groupies. They make a good living, but they don't have Koch brothers' money. They seem to be content to be asked to nice dinners in exchange for cheerleading for the Oligarchs they worship. Alito, Scalia, Roberts, Thomas and Kennedy sit in their chambers with their pom poms at the ready waiting for a chance to prove their devotion to the money they do not have. Someday their prince will come.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.