RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Woodward writes: "Petraeus, Ailes advised, should turn down an expected offer from President Obama to become CIA director and accept nothing less than the chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top military post. If Obama did not offer the Joint Chiefs post, Petraeus should resign from the military and run for president, Ailes suggested."

In this June 29, 2012 file photo, Gen. David Petraeus testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. (photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
In this June 29, 2012 file photo, Gen. David Petraeus testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. (photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)

Fox's Ailes Urged Petraeus to Run for President

By Bob Woodward, The Washington Post

04 December 12



Roger Ailes, the longtime Republican media guru, founder of Fox News and its current chairman, had some advice last year for then-Gen. David H. Petraeus.

o in spring 2011, Ailes asked a Fox News analyst headed to Afghanistan to pass on his thoughts to Petraeus, who was then the commander of U.S. and coalition forces there. Petraeus, Ailes advised, should turn down an expected offer from President Obama to become CIA director and accept nothing less than the chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top military post. If Obama did not offer the Joint Chiefs post, Petraeus should resign from the military and run for president, Ailes suggested.

The Fox News chairman's message was delivered to Petraeus by Kathleen T. McFarland, a Fox News national security analyst and former national security and Pentagon aide in three Republican administrations. She did so at the end of a 90-minute, unfiltered conversation with Petraeus that touched on the general's future, his relationship with the media and his political aspirations - or lack thereof. The Washington Post has obtained a digital recording from the meeting, which took place in Petraeus's office in Kabul.

McFarland also said that Ailes - who had a decades-long career as a Republican political consultant, advising Richard M. Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush - might resign as head of Fox to run a Petraeus presidential campaign. At one point, McFarland and Petraeus spoke about the possibility that Rupert Murdoch, the head of News Corp., which owns Fox News, would "bankroll" the campaign.

"Rupert's after me as well," Petraeus told McFarland.

McFarland said she had spoken "directly" to the Fox News chairman and the "advice to you from Roger Ailes is. ... He says that if you're offered [JCS] chairman, take it. If you're offered anything else, don't take it; resign in six months and run for president."

Petraeus demurred, saying he would consider the CIA directorship if Obama offered it, as the president did several weeks later. Petraeus was confirmed and sworn in as director on Sept. 6, 2011. He resigned a year later, on Nov. 9, after the disclosure of an extramarital affair with his biographer.

In a telephone interview Monday, the wily and sharp-tongued Ailes said he did indeed ask McFarland to make the pitch to Petraeus. "It was more of a joke, a wiseass way I have,"he said. "I thought the Republican field [in the primaries] needed to be shaken up and Petraeus might be a good candidate."

Ailes added, "It sounds like she thought she was on a secret mission in the Reagan administration. ... She was way out of line. ... It's someone's fantasy to make me a kingmaker. It's not my job." He said that McFarland was not an employee of Fox but a contributor paid less than $75,000 a year.

Petraeus, Murdoch and McFarland did not respond to calls and messages requesting comment.

When McFarland first said she had a message directly from Ailes, Petraeus said, "With no one else in the room, I hope?"

Later she said, "I'm only reporting this back to Roger. And that's our deal."

Petraeus said it was okay to relay his response to Ailes, adding "that has to be off the record."

"His deal with me was that I was only supposed to talk to you," McFarland said. "And he is a little paranoid, so believe me, he doesn't have anybody in that room."

At the meeting, some 18 months ago, Petraeus told McFarland that he thought the CIA was "a treasure. ... I think that organization is full of just heroes. Unsung heroes." He went on to say, "We're going to be retrenching militarily." In contrast, the CIA and the intelligence agencies, "I think, are going to be a growth industry," Petraeus said.

While rejecting Ailes' advice, Petraeus said, "I love Roger. ... He's a brilliant guy."

Petraeus said he "would love to see" Ailes on his next trip to New York, where Ailes has his office.

"Tell him if I ever ran," Petraeus said, and then laughed, "but I won't ... but if I ever ran, I'd take him up on his offer. ... He said he would quit Fox ... and bankroll it."

"Bankroll it?" asked McFarland, who served as a senior aide to Henry Kissinger and later as a Pentagon spokeswoman in the Reagan administration.

"Or maybe I'm confusing that with Rupert," Petraeus said.

"I know Roger, he's done okay," McFarland replied, "but ... no, I think the one who's bankrolling it is the big boss."

"That might be it," Petraeus said.

"Okay," McFarland said, "the big boss is bankrolling it. Roger's going to run it. And the rest of us are going to be your in-house."

"Yeah, right, okay," Petraeus said.

"We're all set."

"It's never going to happen," Petraeus said. "You know it's never going to happen. It really isn't.

"My wife would divorce me," he added. "And I love my wife. ... We have a beautiful house." Both Petraeus and McFarland laughed. "With his-and-hers bathrooms, believe it or not. I just want to live in it. I've never spent a night in it."

* * *

The digital recording also provides a glimpse into the close relationship Petraeus had with the news media, especially Fox News. At one point, McFarland declared that "everybody at Fox loves you," adding that Ailes had directed her to ask Petraeus whether "there [is] anything Fox is doing, right or wrong, that you want to tell us to do differently?"

Petraeus didn't hesitate. "The editorial policy of Fox had shifted," he said. "It was almost as if, because they're going after Obama, they had to go after Obama's war as well." He said he had discussed this with Bret Baier, a key Fox anchor.

"Papers and news outlets have editorial policies," Petraeus said. "They know sort of how their bosses feel about things ... and it causes a certain shading," Petraeus continued.

One example, according to Petraeus: "Off the record, the New York Times was never going to give Bush or Iraq a break. I don't care what happened.

"In fact, one time Thom Shanker [a Times military correspondent], who I think very highly of, wrote a piece. And it was on me, before I was going to testify one time, and they had — a pretty good piece, I mean, factual, in other words. Again, all we want is the truth. We're not out to spin. But then it had this sort of really odd thing inserted in it. And it was something that had been proven unfounded, but it sort of bounced around on the kind of Webs. And I said, "Thom, where did that come from?' He said, "Oh, that was added by the editors.'?"

Both journalists had different recollections. Baier said he recalled no such conversation with Petraeus. "That's B.S.," he said. "We cover the war the same way no matter what administration is in power."

Shanker also said he did not remember saying anything resembling what Petraeus asserted. "I don't blame the editors for what appears under my byline," he said. "It undermines your own credibility."

* * *

In the meeting with McFarland, Petraeus gave his standard line about the Afghanistan war, saying there had been significant progress, but "that progress remains fragile and reversible."

McFarland mentioned her conversation with Petraeus in a piece on April 27, 2011. "Our discussion was off the record, and to respect that I will not quote the general," she wrote. By that time, it was clear that Petraeus would be nominated as CIA director. "I can't help thinking that the Obama administration has done something a bit underhanded but politically shrewd by tapping Petraeus for the CIA," she added, because it would remove him as a "potential rival" in the presidential contest.

On Monday, Ailes, 72, said there was "zero chance" he would leave Fox to reenter politics for Petraeus or anyone else. "The money is too good," he said, declining to say how much he earned, although reliable reports have pegged the amount at roughly $20 million per year under a new four-year contract.

"I left politics in 1988 because I hated it," Ailes said. "My main interest is seeing my 12-year-old's basketball games." your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+37 # Barbara K 2012-12-04 14:54
Oh, yeah, like he would be a reliable source of advice or information. lol. Dump Fox Nooz.
+34 # jjj 2012-12-04 15:37
Is this irony or hypocrisy? The very types who went berserk at Clinton's in-office infidelity are now putting forth an adulterous candidate. Guess a sin is worse if it is committed by a Democrat or liberal, forgivable if it's a Republican Conservative.
+17 # Ralph Averill 2012-12-04 16:11
jjj, the entire story is in the past tense, and even then, BEFORE the Paula Broadwell affair became public, Patraeus turned down the offer.
Ailes was right, however. Patraeus, sans Broadwell, would have left all those clowns seeking the Republican presidential slot, including Romney, in the dust, and given Obama a much, much tougher race for re-election. Thank you Paula Broadwell and your paranoid e-mails.
+21 # joedeane 2012-12-04 15:52
Maybe now we know why the General did not follow Ailes adviced. I kind of thought that he would run. It seems the military mind could see that he was too vulnerable in that position, whereas at CIA he could defend himself. Thank you Paula Broadwell.
+12 # giraffee2012 2012-12-04 16:19
I can only say "rolf" - doesn't the GOP know they LOST??????????? ??
0 # universlman 2012-12-07 13:01
You bet they know they lost. However, instead of adjusting their thinking, they have decided instead to find a more alluring spokesman (like Patraeus) to flog egotistical message for them. GOP backers are focused on protecting their own pile of money. They want public “service” only to serve them. Anything less is sold as dangerous for the economy (sure . . . THEIR economy.)

It warms my heart to watch them flounder rather than start to swim.
0 # giraffee2012 2012-12-10 15:55
Petraeus is a has been that never was!
0 # maddave 2012-12-10 21:35
Don't you kid yourself, giraffee! Petraeus and the generals & admirals of his ilk are dangerous, orthodox zealots with a substantial following in the military --- Army & Air Force in particular. With the division of wealth in this country on par today with Columbia & Paraguay and with the blind adoration which we bestow on our senior military officers, how does Obama's USA differ today from from Allende's Chile in 1972? I'll tell you: we aren't in a crisis - not yet.

For the uninformed amongst us, our "all volunteer Army" is a de facto mercenary force that is supplemented by twenty-or more true, no-bullshit, for-pay-only, well armed mercenary forces such as Blackwater's current incarnation. Most of these groups work for the CIA now and worked for Petraeus when he headed the CIA.

If he wished---and given well propagandized & perceived "emergency circumstances" --- Petraeus probably would not need to waste time "running" for POTUS. Military "votes" alone would suffice for him (or some other military luminary) to impose martial law and take over the government.

Such an attempt was proposed in 1936, but the proposed leader (BGen Smedley Butler, USMC) squelched the plans!

So, this is NOT a new concept, and with the current status of the GOP being as it is . . . ?
+8 # fredboy 2012-12-04 16:27
Glad he did not have the opportunity to betray us.
+11 # WestWinds 2012-12-04 16:35
When I saw "Petraeus" and "run for president" in the same graph, I had a SERIOUS "OMG!!!" moment. As if we don't have enough problems without throwing toads and snakes into the soup!
+8 # cordleycoit 2012-12-04 17:50
Soldiers don't mind changing the public's thought on democracy, for our own good: of course.
+13 # reiverpacific 2012-12-04 19:12
Good Gawd!
And this guy was C.I.A. boss on OBAMA's watch???
Bipartisanship be damned. Take a page from the Rethug's book and toss anybody out who even LOOKS to the right. The Dem's are far enough right of center already and we need a few more staunch lefties like Warren, Grayson and of course independent Bernie Sanders, to dig their heels in and drag the party back to at least the center -then kickin' and screamin' over the fading left-facing line.
Gladly to state, "Fix's" credibility has taken a battering during and-post-electi on: we need to jump on the remains with cleated boots.
Bloody 'ell, bollocks and brimstone!
+6 # Duke of Earl 2012-12-04 19:30
I guess Roger forgot to get Rupert's wire taps before approaching Petraeus.
+4 # Lennie 2012-12-04 19:49
Just think, we could have added one more to the long list of Wandering Weenies in the White House.
+13 # Vermont Grandma 2012-12-04 20:15
The information in this article reinforces that Democrats who think they are doing a good deed, or will get brownie points, by appointing Republicans to important positions are deluded. Obama staff vetting of Petreus should have been enough in-depth to disclose that Petreus was cozy with and liked FOX news, that he felt Bush had been treated unfairly by the media, etc., etc. AND should have resulted in a decision to NOT appoint Petreus to head the CIA.
-7 # joedeane 2012-12-04 21:46
And what conclsion do you draw from this? Obama is an unmitigated jerk with no political sense.He sounds great which is a talent but his actions are disgusting, the drone murdering creep that pisses on habeus corpus.
+1 # MarieLavoe 2012-12-05 09:17
So was it Faux Nooz who blew the whistle regarding Petreus's mistress ???? Don't fool with Roger Ailes big ole fat Azz.
+2 # futhark 2012-12-05 11:02
Now we have proof positive that Fox News is an organization dedicated to the subversion of the Republican Party. The Republicans are already doing a pretty good job of making themselves obsolete by nominating plutocrat tools like Romney. A Petreus nomination would absolutely seal their doom.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.