RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Rushe reports: "Washington looks set to wave through new cybersecurity legislation next week that opponents fear will wipe out decades of privacy protections at a stroke."

File image, internet censorship. (photo: The Inquistir)
File image, internet censorship. (photo: The Inquistir)

Warning: CISPA Gives Government Wide Net Access

By Dominic Rushe, Guardian UK

18 April 12


ashington looks set to wave through new cybersecurity legislation next week that opponents fear will wipe out decades of privacy protections at a stroke.

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (Cispa) will be discussed in the House of Representatives next week and already has the support of 100 House members.

It will be the first such bill to go to a vote since the collapse of the Stop Online Piracy Act (Sopa) in January after global protests and a concerted campaign by internet giants such as Google, Wikipedia and Twitter.

The author of the new bill, Mike Rogers, the Republican chair of the House intelligence committee, has said it is aimed at tracking the nefarious activities of hackers, terrorists and foreign states, especially China. But its critics charge the bill will affect ordinary citizens and overturn the privacy protections they now enjoy.

Opponents fear the way it is currently drafted will open up ordinary citizens to unprecedented scrutiny. The bill uses the wording: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law," a phrase that if it became law would trump all existing legislation, according to critics.

In one section, the bill defines "efforts to degrade, disrupt or destroy" a network as an area that would trigger a Cispa investigation. Opponents argue something as simple as downloading a large file – a movie for example – could potentially be defined as an effort to "degrade" a network.

The bill also exempts companies from any liability for handing over private information.

"As it stands the bill allows companies to turn over private information to the government and for them to use it for any purpose that they see fit, all without a warrant," said Michelle Richardson, with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). "For 40 years we have had legislation about wiretapping that protects people. This would overturn that and make a cyber exception."

Privacy advocates are especially concerned about what they see as the overly broad language of the bill. As people increasingly use services like Skype and other internet telephony services, Twitter and Facebook to communicate, advocates fear the bill is a land grab that would give US authorities unprecedented access to private information while removing a citizen's legal protection.

The White House has called for the bill to be tightened. In a statement, national security council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said any legislation should include "robust safeguards to preserve the privacy and civil liberties of our citizens".

But Richardson said with wide support in the House, the bill could still pass. "The Senate has already said it is looking at this bill as it drafts its own legislation. There is a real danger it will be rushed through," she said.
"Our concern is not about what the bill is aiming to do, it's about the way it is crafted," said Rainey Reitman, activism director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a digital-rights organisation.

She said the EFF has three main concerns with the bill:

• First, there is a lack of any standard for the type of information that can be collected.

• Second, all the information will go to the national security agency, the US defense department's online intelligence arm. In 2010, the NSA was found guilty of conducting surveillance programmes without warrants.

• Third, there is no clarity in the bill as to what the information will be used for. "It should be used for cybersecurity purposes only, but the bill doesn't say that," Reitman said.

Rogers claims Google has been supportive of Cispa, but the search giant has not commented. He has amended the bill, most recently taking out references to theft of intellectual property. Sopa, the last bill to try and tackle such theft, was scrapped after a global revolt. He added an amendment allowing people and companies to sue the US government if it violates the terms of use for the information.

The homeland security department was also given a greater role in collecting information, although critics noted that information would still be passed to the NSA.

Richardson called the changes "cosmetic" and said the fundamental issues remained. She said: "This bill is simply too broadly defined and overturns vital protections."

The EFF, ACLU and others have been attempting to coordinate a revolt against Cispa similar to the one that overthrew Sopa, but so far the campaign has not gathered the same momentum. Rogers has said the privacy protests are "like turbulence on the way down to landing" for the bill. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+6 # Valleyboy 2012-04-19 07:16
Surely this bill, and all it's other siblings, are designed to give government's a way to track and shut down dissent.

They have a decision to make: Change the system that is failing the 99%, or gear up to defend it at all costs.

Unfortunately, bills like this give a strong indication that they are heading down the wrong path.
+5 # John Locke 2012-04-19 08:05
Thank you Mr. Obama! I know You want to insure the 1st and 4th Amendments are completely dead...and I am sure you have very good reasons, so like all good party members Sir, we'll overlook this also, Like we did NDAA and the Patriot act extension, and your Tax cuts for the wealthy, and you compromising Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid, because we know you will do better by us your next term, and we consider you the Lesser of two evils!

so please rest assured that you will have our loyal party vote sir, no matter what you approve in legislation, after all we know the republicans would be so much worse!!!

In case you can't tell, this is sarcasm
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2012-04-19 11:36
Paranoia...Gove rnement has been watching us since McCarthy and J Edgar. In most cases, they know who to watch.
None of us are going around threatening to blow up anywhere. We are not asking to get into the Oval Office, Pentagon, I am not looking to learn to fly.

I have dissented my Government thru worse than this. That is my right. I also will serve my Government in case of disaster if they need me. There is a difference. I pledge allegiance and mean it.

The problem is CISPA is showing what a ludicrous law it is, it can be overturned by a good Senate, House. What it should show us all is that the places like Facebook is no good. These creeps have been selling our info since they put it on line, they are Whores...RSN has shown how many time Z has sold people out...and yet people stay on the FB Why? There are other sites, some will not give up privacy. I believe this could be a good court case if we had real Supreme Court Justices.

CISPA feeds on scarying people. They are paranoid schizos much like the junkies on the streets. I am not impressed. Sad thing is they breed.
+2 # panhead49 2012-04-19 13:21
Well, we could try to get together with our like minded friends at local coffee shops etc to discuss what we aren't feeling compfortable putting on line. It'll drive the Feds nuts and put coin into the local coffers. They go high tech - let's go low tech. They won't know whether to **** or go blind. Or go super low tech and send your crew an actual hand written letter.

Good gravy - we smuggled info into POW camps in WWII by hiding info in game pieces - are we so high tech now we can't function at a low tech level?

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.