RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Eidelson writes: "An audio recording released by labor activists Wednesday afternoon captures a staffer for McDonald's' 'McResources Line' instructing a McDonald's worker how to apply for public assistance."

Part-time McDonald's maintenance worker Robert Wideman, 55, shines the shoe of Ronald McDonald during a protest outside a Hollywood McDonald's. (photo: Liz O. Baylen/LA Times)
Part-time McDonald's maintenance worker Robert Wideman, 55, shines the shoe of Ronald McDonald during a protest outside a Hollywood McDonald's. (photo: Liz O. Baylen/LA Times)


McDonald's Tells Workers to Get Food Stamps

By Josh Eidelson, Salon

24 October 13

 

A new recording captures the fast food giant's worker 1-800 number touting public assistance

n audio recording released by labor activists Wednesday afternoon captures a staffer for McDonald's' "McResources Line" instructing a McDonald's worker how to apply for public assistance.

The audio - excerpted in the campaign video below - records a conversation between Chicago worker Nancy Salgado, a ten-year employee currently making the Illinois state minimum wage of $8.25, and a counselor staffing the company's "McResources" 1-800 number for McDonald's workers. The McResources staffer offers her a number to "ask about things like food pantries" and tells her she "would most likely be eligible for SNAP benefits" which she explains are "food stamps." After Salgado asks about "the doctor," the staffer asks, "Did you try to get on Medicaid?" She notes it's "health coverage for low income or no income adults and children."

"It was really, really upsetting," Salgado told Salon Wednesday, "knowing that McDonald's knows that they don't pay us enough, and we have to rely on this." Noting that McDonald's was "a billionaire company," she asked, "how can they not afford to pay us?"

In the full, fifteen-minute audio, which was provided to Salon by the campaign, the McResources counselor can also be heard telling Salgado she "definitely should be able to qualify for both food stamps and heating assistance." She tells Salgado that having food stamps "takes a lot of the pressure off how much money you spend on groceries." She also tells Salgado she may possibly qualify for Medicaid, though "I wouldn't want to get your hopes up." The conversation begins with Salgado telling the counselor that she's recording the conversation so she can share the info with her sister; it ends with the counselor suggesting Salgado urge the owner of her franchised store to pay a fee and sign up for McResources, which she says would allow McDonald's to provide more help to employees there.

The video is the latest salvo in a union-backed effort to force a transformation in the virtually non-union fast food industry, which is increasingly prevalent in and representative of the post-crash US economy. As I've reported, the campaign - whose key national backer is the Service Employees International Union - has included a wave of strikes which began in New York last November, and in August escalated to a one-day sixty-city work stoppage.

The new video follows two reports released last week - one by the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Department of Urban & Regional Planning, funded by the fast food campaign; and another by the pro-union National Employment Law Project - which estimated that fast food workers utilize nearly $7 billion annually in public assistance, while fast food corporations last year netted $7.4 billion profits.

After noting such stats, the campaign video's on-screen text reads, "McDonald's doesn't want to pay its workers more. McDonald's wants you to pay its workers more." And then, "Umm, who's on welfare? These guys" - followed by icons for McDonald's and other top fast food chains.

The video was released hours after a DC press event in which three congressional Democrats joined members of the union-backed non-union workers group OUR Walmart to blast the retail giant for paying wages that leave workers in need of public assistance. As I reported, Congressman George Miller accused the company of undermining the purpose of welfare reform, while Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky called Walmart elites the real "welfare kings" of America. Highlighting employees' use of public assistance was also a tactic of the union-backed mid-2000's "air war" efforts against the company. That message was criticized at the time by Wal-Mart defender Jason Fuman, who now chairs the White House Council of Economic Advisors; he wrote in 2006 that Wal-Mart critics seemed to be "playing on the atavistic anti-welfare, anti-government, anti-tax instincts of some conservatives."

McDonald's did not immediately respond to a Wednesday afternoon inquiry. The National Restaurant Association last week dismissed the Berkeley-Urbana-Champaign study: its Executive Vice President Scott DeFife charged in an e-mail that "These misleading efforts use a very narrow lens and selective data to attack the industry for their own purposes and fail to recognize that the majority of lower-wage employees works part-time to supplement a family income."

Salgado said she "of course" supports government funding for the public programs mentioned on the McResources line, but that she found it "ridiculous how fast food workers, we have to rely on our government systems," given that "McDonald's should be able to pay all of its employees" enough not to. While "McDonald's is going to say what's good for them," charged Salgado, "it's not only a part-time job at this point. It's a job that we all rely on." Salgado confronted McDonald's US CEO earlier this month when he was keynoting a Union League Club First Friday luncheon, asking him whether it was fair for her to be making the state minimum wage after a decade of service.

Salgado, who has twice joined fellow non-union fast food workers in going on strike, told Salon that "at first was very scary," and she expected to be fired. However, she said, "after I went back with a lot of support from my union, it was really easy afterwards."

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olUsgn-Ubh0

 

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+27 # Billy Bob 2013-10-24 09:24
The true face of food stamps and the social safety net, that the Reptilian Party wants to destroy, because it thinks "it's a disincentive to working hard".
 
 
+25 # grouchy 2013-10-24 09:53
Realistically, the taxpayer is thus picking up the bill for this and so it amounts to CORPORATE WELFARE plain and simple!

I bet their corporate leaders are also involved in supporting the trend of badmouthing the low wage workers and the unemployed! This makes McGrunge corporate leaders TOTAL ASSHOLES!

Put them on the same wage scale as their workers for a year or so and see how they like it!
 
 
+14 # Billy Bob 2013-10-24 10:41
I read m...'s comment before yours. You're both absolutely right and there's no reason this couldn't be a central part of the argument for more of a safety net, less corporate welfare, and a higher minimum wage.
 
 
+18 # m... 2013-10-24 10:12
So, if I got the gist of this...

McDonalds is 'taxing' the American People in order to be competitive and increase profits...?

Or..,

Perhaps assisting with paperwork in order to apply for Welfare... on a Corporations-ar e-just-plain-fo lks-too scale...?
 
 
0 # Karl Kolchak 2013-10-24 10:38
"Wal-Mart defender Jason Fuman, who now chairs the White House Council of Economic Advisors"

That tells you everything you need to know about Obama right there.
 
 
+15 # fredboy 2013-10-24 10:51
Hopefully they won't be able to use them to buy the junk McDonald's sells.
 
 
+9 # jwb110 2013-10-24 11:06
I wonder what the GOP/TP thinks about, what I am sure is a contributor to them, telling the working poor to use the very system that the GOP/TP complains about? Aside from the fact that working people should be able to feed themselves from their wages, MacDonald's is now supporting the welfare state in order to widen their profit margins.
You can't have it both way, boys!
 
 
+2 # ENetArch 2013-10-24 11:43
The unfortunate part of this story is that the only way to force businesses to pay a living wage to employees is to remove the resources these businesses rely on. For example, any employee working for a business that has over 50 employees and/or states it has income revenues to pay every employee a living wage (20$ / hr or more) would be prevented from receiving any public assistance.

Before we run out and implement this law, we should seriously consider the ramifications that this bill would have, not only one those who receive funding, but also on the consumers, since the corporations would need to renegotiate the multi million dollar CEO contracts.
 
 
+8 # bingers 2013-10-24 13:35
Any corporation paying so poorly that their employees have to apply for food stamps should have all their assets frozen and their corporate charters revoked and all their corporate executives jailed for life and their assets frozen as well.

Like drug dealers they should not be allowed to hire competent attorneys and should have to rely on public defenders only.
 
 
+2 # X Dane 2013-10-24 17:00
bingers......Th at sounds good. I am really mad that MY taxes have to support these corporate vultures. I NEVER by any "food" at fast food places, and still my taxes are being used to enrich these creeps, that is infuriating.

So is the fact that all the emergency visit poor people are forced to make, cost all of us dearly.
 
 
+1 # rockieball 2013-10-25 07:52
Wal-Mart is the same way. A fellow workers wife was an assistant manager of a Wal-Mart Superstore here in town and she told about how when they were hiring to open the store they gave new employees a list of emergency rooms and clinics where they could get cheap or fee medical assistance. They also not only gave but helped fill out food stamp applications. Then told them where to apply and the best times to go. Also even though they gave employees a discount on what they bought in the store, the employees were restricted from using food stamps.
 
 
0 # fredboy 2013-10-25 12:28
Billy Bob, love the "Reptilian Party" tag. That is a perfect description: no thought process, no empathy, just cold, vicious, snake thinking.

And for the redneck trash who subscribe to Reptilian Party thinking, just think of the perfect Biblical metaphor: Satan came in the form of a serpent. Oh, never mind, I forgot that none of you know what the word "metaphor" means...
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN