RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Lazare writes: "After years of lobbying to break into European markets, Canada's tar sands oil industry is poised to score a victory from EU lawmakers who have signaled willingness to drop a requirement that labels tar sands oil as dirtier than other fossil fuels."

Tar sands in Alberta. (photo: Howl Arts Collective/Flickr Creative Commons)
Tar sands in Alberta. (photo: Howl Arts Collective/Flickr Creative Commons)


EU Gets Ready to Open Canadian Tar Sands Floodgate

By Sarah Lazare, Common Dreams

07 June 14

 

Despite protest, lawmakers poised to give legislative handout to industry that peddles one of world's dirtiest fossil fuels

fter years of lobbying to break into European markets, Canada's tar sands oil industry is poised to score a victory from EU lawmakers who have signaled willingness to drop a requirement that labels tar sands oil as dirtier than other fossil fuels.

The EU agreed five years ago to a piece of climate legislation called the 'Fuel Quality Directive,' which was to go into effect in 2010 with the aim of cutting transport fuel emissions by 6 percent by 2020. Yet thanks to heavy industry lobbying and government stalling, the plan still has not gone into effect years later.

Both the Financial Times and Reuters reported Thursday that the EU is likely to weaken the language of the not-yet-implemented plan by scrapping a requirement that bitumen—oil extracted from tar sands—be labeled as high-emissions diesel. The higher rating would have discouraged, but not prevented, imports.

A draft document drawn up by the European Commission will, if implemented, allow companies to sidestep penalties on tar sands imports. "Under the new methodology, companies would only have to make their emission cuts based on EU averages for the 'output' fuels – the petrol or diesel – regardless of whether it was originally made from heavy crude or not," the Financial Times explains.

One of the world's dirtiest fossil fuels, bitumen produces up to five times more carbon than conventional crude oil. The extraction process is extremely energy-intensive, destructive to ecosystems, and creates large reservoirs of toxic waste. Environmental groups have argued that proposed regulations in previous drafts of the Fuel Quality Directive were already too lax, and that tar sands should simply stay in the ground.

The government of Canada and the oil industry have aggressively opposed potential EU penalties on bitumen imports, and Canada's Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford pressed the issue in sideline conversations at the G7 meetings in Rome last month.

Meanwhile, environmental protesters rallied this week against what is believed to be the first large shipment of bitumen to Europe, which arrived in Spain from Canada.

"Tar sands are deadly for our climate and must be kept in the ground and out of Europe," said Colin Roche of Friends of the Earth in a statement about the delivery. "To give a lifeline to this dangerous industry is to set us up for climate disaster."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+7 # mscw42 2014-06-07 11:11
A victory for the tar sands industry is a tragedy for the Earth and its inhabitants.
 
 
+2 # Archie1954 2014-06-07 18:53
Oh,oh, now I'm putting two and two together to get four. I have been wondering what in the World Canadian Prime Minister Harper has been going on about with his denouncement of Putin and his aggressive tone against Russia. Well of course, this article cleared that up. Canada has been lobbying for years to allow tar sands oil into the EU. With Harper's hard stance against Russia and his implication that its position as a major exporter of petroleum products to the EU cannot be trusted in the long term, he is advancing Canadian oil sands as the best alternative. Thank you Common Dreams for answering my question.
 
 
+2 # Third_stone 2014-06-08 13:34
The plan to ship this oil to Texas is a trick to dupe rubes. The mess created by refinement of this slop is not being mentioned, but as I understand it whole ares will become uninhabitable from the effluent ponds.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN