RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Excerpt: "While the world may accept that the US and Afghan governments have some 'state' or 'noble' considerations for not revealing the contents of the US Afghan Strategic Partnership Agreement, how about the democratic consideration of involving Afghans in their own future?"

President Obama and President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan signed an agreement in Kabul on Tuesday, 05/01/12. (photo: Doug Mills/NYT)
President Obama and President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan signed an agreement in Kabul on Tuesday, 05/01/12. (photo: Doug Mills/NYT)

The UN May Have Silenced the Afghan Public

By Hakim and Kathy Kelly, Voices for Creative Nonviolence

02 May 12


The Institute for Public Accuracy has released recent comments from the authors of the article below following President Obama's surprise visit to Afghanistan. -- CW/RSN

oday, Afghanistan and the U.S. initialed and locked the text of the strategic partnership agreement," said Karzai's spokesman, Aimal Faizi. "This means the text is closed…”

Why ‘lock’ or ‘close’ the future of Afghanistan to 30 million ordinary Afghan citizens?

While the world may accept that the U.S. and Afghan governments have some ’state’ or ‘noble’ considerations for not revealing the contents of the U.S. Afghan Strategic Partnership Agreement, how about the democratic consideration of involving Afghans in their own future?

Even the Afghan Parliament was in the dark and uninvolved until they were recently given a peek when Afghanistan’s National Security Advisor, Rangin Dadfar Spanta, read ‘portions’ of the Agreement to assembled parliamentarians on 23rd April, saying that the U.S. will defend Afghanistan from any outside interference via "diplomatic means, political means, economic means and even military means.”

The U.S. has said it expects to keep about 20,000 troops in the country after 2014.

What IS the Afghan public opinion regarding the U.S. Afghan Strategic Partnership Agreement?

Does anyone know?

In an article dated 11th July 2011, Iman Hassan of ‘The News’ wrote:

“… the Afghan public has outrightly rejected the US plans as the results of a survey conducted by UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) suggest. UNAMA with its 23 offices in Afghanistan conducted the survey across the country some two months back and hasn’t published it. Although, the survey’s findings are widely known. If published the stark survey results will undermine the US’ future strategic plans.”

Out of curiosity, the Afghan Peace Volunteers pursued the question of whether the UN had actually conducted such a survey.

We sent emails to friends with the Fellowship of Reconciliation U.S.A who have correspondence and contact with the UN. Below was the reply that was forwarded to us.

14th April 2012

Dear XXX,

I sent an email inquiry to the UN Coordinator in Afghanistan to ask about the survey.

As I suspected, I did not receive any response. It seems they are not willing to talk about it.

But I will keep watching for any future publications.



We also asked a staff member at McClatchy Newspapers in Kabul if he could ask some questions at the UN office in Kabul. We have not heard any news from the McClatchy staff.

So, we still don’t know if there was ever such a survey conducted by the UN office in Kabul.

We feel that even if there was no such survey, then a survey should be conducted under the auspices of the UN, and its results made known before the signing of the agreement, to rebuild trust in the UN, U.S. and Afghan governments’ democratic processes.

The contents of the U.S. Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement should be ‘unlocked’ to the American and Afghan public, and the survey conducted among Afghans in every province, particularly in the provinces where the joint military operations of the Strategic Partnership Agreement will continue to be launched beyond 2014.

Has the UN silenced the Afghan public?

But perhaps, participation in today’s democracy is designed to be ‘locked’ away.

We, the Afghan Peace Volunteers, respectfully ask for the key.

29th April 2012 your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+2 # cadan 2012-05-02 10:55
Thanks Hakim and Kathy Kelly, and RSN, for writing and publishing about efforts to see what the Afghans themselves want regarding thousands of foreign troops in their country. (Somehow don't expect to see this in the NYT---but if i'm wrong somebody plese correct me.)
+2 # bluepilgrim 2012-05-02 10:59
Afghans have silent, no-bang, IEDs now? The Taliban has silencers on their weapons? That's what will be needed to silence the Afghan people, because they will go right resisting regardless of what Obama or Karzai says.
+4 # tomo 2012-05-02 12:03
Our President has never been more transparently duplicitous than yesterday in his statement on ENDING America's war in Afghanistan. Actually, it was an upsidedown proclamation of our intent to stay in Afghanistan longer than anyone in Afghanistan has invited us to--anyone, that is, including Hamid Karzai, whom we installed in Afghanistan for the sole purpose of agreeing to whatever agenda we saw fit to impose.
-2 # Merschrod 2012-05-02 13:03
This article is petty light weight when it comes to evidence and heavy on the innuendo. Surely Friends of Reconciliation can do better than fire off an email. Personal, informal contacts are the way to gain information. On the survey, it must have been conducted by teams of Afghans in each major area under the direction of an international polling firm or a local affiliate (and there probably is one). The fact of the survey would be hard to keep under wraps, the content of the survey slightly easier but impossible to hide. The tabulated results, much easier to keep under wraps. The final report .. well that would be easier to keep under wraps. but let;s get serious about finding out what went on - much more serious than an email. Serious journalism is needed.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.