RSN Fundraising Banner
Trump's Latest Proposal Would Let Businesses Discriminate Based On LGBTQ Status, Race, Religion, and More
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=46829"><span class="small">Dominic Holden, BuzzFeed</span></a>   
Thursday, 15 August 2019 08:34

Holden writes: "The Trump administration on Wednesday formally proposed a new rule to let businesses with federal contracts cite religious objections as a valid reason to discriminate against their workers on the basis of LGBTQ status, sex, race, ethnicity, national origin, and other characteristics - thereby skirting worker protections created by past presidents."

A march against Donald Trump. (photo: Scout Tufankjan/ACLU)
A march against Donald Trump. (photo: Scout Tufankjan/ACLU)


Trump's Latest Proposal Would Let Businesses Discriminate Based On LGBTQ Status, Race, Religion, and More

By Dominic Holden, BuzzFeed

15 August 19


The rule, which applies to many federal contractors, is Trump’s latest move to let religious people sidestep civil rights policies.

he Trump administration on Wednesday formally proposed a new rule to let businesses with federal contracts cite religious objections as a valid reason to discriminate against their workers on the basis of LGBTQ status, sex, race, ethnicity, national origin, and other characteristics — thereby skirting worker protections created by past presidents.

The move marks President Donald Trump’s latest effort to weaken the civil rights of minorities with ambiguous rules that grant agencies wide discretion to let companies off the hook when accused of discrimination.

The 46-page draft rule from the Labor Department would apply to a range of so-called religious organizations — including corporations, schools, and societies — provided that they claim a “religious purpose.”

Labor Department spokesperson Megan Sweeney confirmed to BuzzFeed News on Wednesday that the rule would apply to for-profit corporations with federal contracts. This would allow those companies discriminate and keep their contract, given that they obtain a religious exemption.

The Trump administration makes clear that a corporation needn’t focus entirely on religion to qualify, saying, “The contractor must be organized for a religious purpose, meaning that it was conceived with a self-identified religious purpose. This need not be the contractor’s only purpose.”

“A religious purpose can be shown by articles of incorporation or other founding documents, but that is not the only type of evidence that can be used,” says the rule, which grants companies many opportunities to claim that faith or morals guide their intent.

The National Center for Transgender Equality said in a statement the rule could allow “firing or refusing to hire someone because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. It could also lead to federal contractors refusing to hire women or unmarried workers who are pregnant or parents, or even discrimination on the basis of race.”

For example, the policy could allow a company that supplies machinery to the federal government to fire a woman simply because she’s a lesbian if it obtains a religious pass.

Workers could still take employers to court, but there is no federal law explicitly protecting LGBTQ workers. And under the proposed rule, the Labor Department wouldn’t need to take enforcement action or cancel lucrative contracts with businesses that make religious claims as the basis for bias.

The new rule would not eliminate longstanding nondiscrimination executive orders — such as a 2014 order banning LGBT discrimination — but rather create a pathway to get around them.

Echoing a sentiment from a Labor Department press release, Sweeney tried to downplay that fact that the plan would allow discrimination, saying in a statement, “The proposed regulation does not exempt or excuse a contractor from complying with other applicable requirements outside of the religious employer exemption.”

But this ignores the heart of the plan: The draft rule exists to create a carveout that protects businesses that raise a religious motive. The Labor Department, according to the proposal, “will find a violation of [the nondiscrimination order] only if it can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a protected characteristic other than religion was a but-for cause of the adverse action.”

Louise Melling, a lawyer for the ACLU characterized it like this: “The agency will find a violation only if it was animated by something other than a religious tenet.”

The proposal could apply to up to 420,000 contractors, according to the draft to be published in the Federal Register. “While only a subset of contractors and would-be contractors may wish to seek this exemption, the Supreme Court, Congress, and the President have each affirmed the importance of protecting religious liberty for those organizations who wish to exercise it,” it reads.

The Labor Department further contends the rule would save contractors and taxpayers money because businesses wouldn’t be bogged down by the legal expenses of fending off discrimination cases.

As the agency put it, the rule “will reduce the risk of non-compliance to contractors and the potential costs of litigation such findings of non-compliance with OFCCP’s requirements might impose.”

The Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs says the rule is necessary to “clarify” existing rules because recent Supreme Court decisions and executive orders have expanded the rights of religious employers with federal contracts.

But none of the three central court cases cited by the agency concern discrimination by religious organizations with federal contracts. Instead, it leans heavily on the case of Hobby Lobby, a for-profit corporation that sought to deny reproductive health insurance coverage to women by claiming a religious excuse.

LGBTQ advocates were alarmed when the draft rule was pending, saying it was being designed to create a loophole in former president Obama’s 2014 executive order that banned contractors from discriminating on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Progressive organizations have also worried the rule could open the door to fire, or refuse to employ, people of minority faiths, divorcés, or women who don’t conform to strict gender norms.

The Trump administration issued a directive with similar aims in August 2018, saying that the Labor Department would grant a broader “religious exemption” for contractors. At the time, officials declined to say in what circumstances it would apply. However, none of the court decisions cited by the agency at the time dealt with employment discrimination, and two of the cases involve for-profit corporations, not religious groups.

The proposed regulation would carry more legal force than the directive and could be difficult for future presidents to undo. The draft regulation will also be subject to a 30-day public comment period.

The Trump administration has steadily expanded its argument that constitutional rights to religious exercise allow employers, shopkeepers, and medical professionals to ignore laws and policies that ban discrimination.

This year, Department of Health and Human Services finalized regulations to protect religious health care providers that deny contraception, while creating a Conscience and Religious Freedom Division, which endeavors to let care providers recuse themselves from providing certain services. The agency also started forming a regulation to protect those workers, but stopped the process after the Office of Management and Budget said HHS had to disclose feedback it got from a comment period.

Before he was forced out of office, then–attorney general Jeff Sessions had been particularly bullish in protecting religious employers, saying in a guidance memo they may hire workers “whose beliefs and conduct are consistent with the employers' religious precepts” and that “the federal government may not condition receipt of a federal grant or contract on the effective relinquishment of a religious organization's hiring exemptions.”

Sessions then directed the Justice Department’s Religious Liberty Task Force this fall to find examples of religious entities being denied government funds, saying the practice “must, and will, stop.”

In that vein, the Office of Management and Budget said on its website in October that the Labor Department “plans to update its regulations to comply with current law regarding protections for religion-exercising organizations.”

The Labor Department contends that two new executive orders from Trump and three Supreme Court rulings have shifted the circumstances in which a contractor can discriminate in the name of religion. The draft rule released Wednesday refers to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Hobby Lobby and Masterpiece Cakeshop, which concerned closely held, for-profit businesses with religious owners, not religious corporations. It also cited the case of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, a church that successfully argued for a government grant to refurbish its playground. (BuzzFeed News has previously reported additional details on the directive, the cases, and the Trump orders.)

The Labor Department’s new draft regulation builds on decades of policy around federal contractors. After President Lyndon B. Johnson banned discrimination by executive order in 1965, President George W. Bush added a narrow religious exemption. Bush’s amendment lets religious corporations make employment decisions based on their faith — like Jewish charities hiring only fellow Jews.

Obama expanded Johnson’s underlying nondiscrimination order to also protect LGBTQ people working for federal contractors, leaving Bush’s narrow exemption intact. The new rule opens up that exemption, but it does not specify the circumstances in which it would apply — those decisions will be left up to enforcement officials at the Labor Department.

Labor Secretary Patrick Pizzella said in a statement Wednesday, “As people of faith with deeply held religious beliefs are making decisions on whether to participate in federal contracting, they deserve clear understanding of their obligations and protections under the law.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # ddd-rrr 2019-08-15 12:06
YOW! Just when I think that EVIL can't get any worse among the 'Bublicans,
"BAMMO!", I’m proven incorrect in that assumption, "BIG-TIME",
by yet another asinine proposal by Trump,
a PRESIDENT, no less!
 
 
+4 # Constitutional Patriot 2019-08-15 14:24
BUSINESSES ARE NOT PEOPLE AND MONEY IS NOT SPEECH.

We need a strong Constitutional amendment to end corporate personhood, not only to remove private money from our elections and force elected officials to again work on behalf of their constituents, but also to end blatant discrimination such as this.
 
 
0 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-08-15 21:34
‘The contractor must be organized for a religious purpose, meaning that it was conceived with a self-identified religious purpose.’
This is appallingly & conveniently imprecise, if the received Hobby Lobby madness is an example: H/L serves no religious purpose but an economic one: to profit its owners; & I suspect most others on this bandwagon are the same. But this policy also reinforces divisiveness & its resulting hate & violence. As I am sure we shall see more fully yet….
 
 
0 # elizabethblock 2019-08-16 20:36
Jennifer Eberhardt, in her wonderful book "Biased," says: "The mistake we keep making - the mistake we all keep making - is in thinking that our work is done. That whatever heroic effort we've made will keep moving us forward. That whatever progress we've seen will keep us from sliding back to burning crosses and hiding Torah scrolls."