RSN Fundraising Banner
Chelsea Manning Can Remain in Jail for Another Year, Judge Rules
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=47379"><span class="small">Dell Cameron, Gizmodo</span></a>   
Thursday, 08 August 2019 08:26

Cameron writes: "Chelsea Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst-turned-whistleblower, may remain behind bars for up to another year and face nearly a half-million dollars in fines over her ongoing refusal to testify before a grand jury about her disclosure of classified information to WikiLeaks."

Former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning speaks with reporters, after arriving at the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, May 16, 2019. (photo: Cliff Owen/AP)
Former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning speaks with reporters, after arriving at the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., Thursday, May 16, 2019. (photo: Cliff Owen/AP)


Chelsea Manning Can Remain in Jail for Another Year, Judge Rules

By Dell Cameron, Gizmodo

08 August 19

 

helsea Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst-turned-whistleblower, may remain behind bars for up to another year and face nearly a half-million dollars in fines over her ongoing refusal to testify before a grand jury about her disclosure of classified information to WikiLeaks.

A federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia on Monday denied a motion filed by Manning’s lawyers for a hearing requested to press the court to reconsider its sanctions, which include jail time—not to exceed 18 months—and financial penalties that may ultimately total around $441,000.

“I am disappointed but not at all surprised. The government and the judge must know by now that this doesn’t change my position one bit,” Manning said in a statement to Gizmodo.

Manning, 31, was taken into custody in early March after declining to answer questions before a grand jury concerning her past association with WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization founded by Julian Assange, who is currently battling extradition to the U.S.

Assange faces an 18-count indictment, issued by U.S. Justice Department this May, including alleged violations of the Espionage Act for publishing classified information that Manning provided in 2010—including thousands of secret diplomatic cables and battlefield reports—while she served as an Army intelligent analyst in Iraq.

Manning has stated that she has a moral objection to testifying before the grand jury and that no amount of jail time will compel her to testify. Legally, she can only be imprisoned as part of an effort by the court to coerce her into testifying. Her time in jail is not supposed to be punitive.

Her attorneys argue that she’s shown her resolve is unwavering and that the sanctions are ineffective. Thus, her time in jail cannot be considered coercive, an attempt to compel her testimony. U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga, however, says he’s convinced otherwise. On Monday, he denied Manning’s attorneys the opportunity to further argue their case before the court.

“In support of the Motion, Ms. Manning has proffered a substantial number of financial records detailing her assets, liabilities, and current future earnings,” he wrote. “The Court has reviewed these records and concludes, based on the evidence proffered, that Ms. Manning has the ability to comply with the Court’s financial sanctions or will have the ability after her release from confinement.”

Trenga added that “based upon the nature and volume of documents,” a hearing “would not aid the decisional process.”

Manning’s attorneys said the judge’s decision was “unexpected,” that she is currently “deeply in debt,” and cannot work while incarcerated. Therefore, they argued, she cannot afford the fines that may ultimately be imposed.

“Chelsea will remain confined for another year, and will face ongoing financial hardship, unless Judge Trenga or a higher court are convince of what Ms. Manning has always publicly maintained: that the sanctions imposed will never coerce her compliance and therefore are entire punitive,” her legal team said.

It remains unclear as to what information U.S. prosecutors hope to attain from Manning’s testimony. Her interactions with WikiLeaks were all detailed during her court-martial six years ago, and logs of her conversations with Assange are already public record.

The continued existence of the WikiLeaks grand jury itself remains a mystery given the scope of the charges already brought against Assange. No evidence presented during any previous hearings, nor any publicly available to date, suggest that Manning had interactions with anyone other than Assange himself.

While Manning’s imprisonment for civil contempt may not exceed 18 months, she could be released earlier, if the grand jury is dismissed beforehand.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+7 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-08-08 09:40
& the unjust, unbalanced & sociopathic torture goes on, in the land of the fee, the home of the grav
 
 
+5 # jmail 2019-08-08 09:53
Chelsea Manning should change her voter registration to Republican. Then she could safely ignore subpoenas like Trump's flunkies do.
 
 
+2 # giraffee23 2019-08-08 10:32
Why is SHE in jail and Trump is not. Trump is NOT?
Probably a GOP judge did this????
VOTE 2020 -- GO BLUE
 
 
+2 # PABLO DIABLO 2019-08-08 13:30
What happened to the 5th Amendment? Take this to a higher Court.
 
 
0 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-08-09 06:14
This is really sickening. This judge is just as bad as the federal prosecutors who will go to any length to put Assange in prison for life.

The case they have against him right now depends on someone testifying that he did more than a journalist normally does; that is, he helped Manning steal the information from the military. Only Manning knows exactly what Assange did. So the prosecutors must have Manning lie for them in order to convict Assange. This is how the DOJ works.

It seems clear that the DOJ is working here just as it did in the Mueller Probe -- trying to force people to lie for them. Subornation of perjury is a worse crime than perjury itself. I wonder why Manning's attorneys are not filing a lawsuit against the DOJ and this judge. Their "corrupt intent" is pretty obviously an "obstruction of justice."

This happened to Jerome Corsi. Mueller wanted him to lie about Assange, Trump, and Roger Stone. He would not do it. Now Corsi has a lawsuit against Mueller. People need to fight back against these tactics of the DOJ. The corruption in the whole criminal justice system is often worse than the crimes committed by garden variety criminals.