RSN Fundraising Banner
Kamala Harris Continues to Receive Donations From Big Pharma Executives Despite Claiming Not To
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=34639"><span class="small">Lee Fang, The Intercept</span></a>   
Friday, 02 August 2019 08:31

Fang writes: "Federal Election Commission campaign finance records show that the California senator has received thousands of dollars from executives at drug companies this year, most of which has not been returned."

Sen. Kamala Harris speaks at Trinity Washington University in Washington, D.C., June 17, 2019. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty)
Sen. Kamala Harris speaks at Trinity Washington University in Washington, D.C., June 17, 2019. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty)


Kamala Harris Continues to Receive Donations From Big Pharma Executives Despite Claiming Not To

By Lee Fang, The Intercept

02 August 19

 

amala Harris’s presidential campaign, while releasing a new health care proposal yesterday, balked at criticism that private industry interests would seek to influence her election effort.

Ian Sams, the national press secretary for the Harris campaign, told CNN on Monday that Harris “is not taking any money from pharmaceutical executives.”

Federal Election Commission campaign finance records, however, show that the California senator has received thousands of dollars from executives at drug companies this year, most of which has not been returned.

Donors include Therese Meaney, a vice president at Endo Pharmaceuticals, a company that manufacturers opioid painkillers, who has given $1,250 to the Harris campaign; Ted Love, the president and chief executive of Global Blood Therapeutics, a startup biopharmaceutical company, who gave $2,800; J. Dana Hughes, a vice president at Pfizer, gave $250; Damian Wilmot, an executive at Vertex Pharmaceuticals, gave $1,000; and Jeffrey Stein, the chief executive of Cidara Therapeutics, another drug startup, who gave $1,000.

There has been some effort by the Harris campaign to return drug company money. Records show the campaign returned a $2,700 donation from John Guthrie, an executive at Pharmaceutics International Inc., in March, for example. Why some drug company donations were accepted and returned, while others were not, is not immediately clear.

During his remarks, Sams swiped at the Bernie Sanders campaign, suggesting that the demand by Sanders that candidates reject drug and insurance money is hypocritical because Sanders also “took some money from pharmaceutical companies before he gave it back.” Sams added that the donations “blurs the line of what the actual issue is here.” The Sanders campaign returned donations from employees at drug companies last month when they were flagged by ABC News.

In an email, Sams reiterated that the campaign does not accept drug company executive money. Sams said the campaign had already returned the donations from Meaney and Stein, though he did not say when the money was returned. Many of the donations, including donations by Meaney and Hughes, were made early in the year — and were not refunded in either the first or second quarter filings. Sams also said the campaign is in the process of returning the donation from Global Blood Therapeutics’ executive. He did not address the other donations.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+4 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-08-02 10:28
This has got to stop. No candidate for the democratic party nomination can take money from criminal corporations, executives, bundlers, political action committees, or other money launderers who are protected under the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United. We simply don't trust such candidates and will not vote for them. Period. Obama taught us a lesson.

Good-bye Kamala Harris. It was nice to get to hear what you had to say. But you are not presidential material. Maybe you would have been 20 years ago. But not today.