RSN Fundraising Banner
Will the US Be a Dystopian Hellscape in 2100 if Emissions Keep Rising?
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51215"><span class="small">Kristy Dahl, Union of Concerned Scientists</span></a>   
Monday, 22 July 2019 13:34

Dahl writes: "Last week, UCS released Killer Heat, a report analyzing how the frequency of days with a dangerously hot heat index - the combination of temperature and humidity the National Weather Service calls the 'feels like' temperature - will change in response to the global emissions choices we make in the coming decades."

Golde Wallingford submitted this photo of 'Pure Joy' to EcoWatch's first photo contest. (photo: Golde Wallingford/EcoWatch)
Golde Wallingford submitted this photo of 'Pure Joy' to EcoWatch's first photo contest. (photo: Golde Wallingford/EcoWatch)


Will the US Be a Dystopian Hellscape in 2100 if Emissions Keep Rising?

By Kristy Dahl, Union of Concerned Scientists

22 July 19

 

ast week, UCS released Killer Heat, a report analyzing how the frequency of days with a dangerously hot heat index — the combination of temperature and humidity the National Weather Service calls the "feels like" temperature — will change in response to the global emissions choices we make in the coming decades.

When I'm deep in an analysis, like the one for Killer Heat and its companion peer-reviewed article, I often have trouble sleeping. I lie awake in the middle of the night trying to get bits of troublesome computer code to work in my head or thinking through all of the boxes that need to be checked before we start writing the report. The Killer Heat analysis kept me awake for an entirely different reason: the results terrified me.

An Unrecognizably Hot Future

To get a sense of why, project yourself, for a moment, into the future: It's late in the century, sometime between 2070 and 2099. We've stayed on our current global carbon emissions path, and the rise in emissions has continued to outpace our efforts to cut them. Kids who were in elementary school in 2019 are retiring, and this is their United States:

  • For the equivalent of a week or more each year, about 120 million people across the country are exposed to conditions so hot, the heat index (or "feels like" temperature) surpasses the limits of the National Weather Service's heat index charts. The upper limit of the heat index scale falls at or above 127°F, depending on temperature and humidity. In other words, they step outside and are hit with a wall of heat that feels upwards of 130°F. How far upwards? That we don't know.

  • In 47 of the lower 48 states, these "off-the-charts" conditions occur in at least one county at least once a year. When this happens, the National Weather Service cannot reliably calculate the heat index. Historically, "off-the-charts" conditions have only occurred in the Sonoran Desert region, along the California-Arizona border, and only for a few days each year.


By late century, with no action to reduce emissions, more than 60% of the U.S. would experience at least one "off-the-charts" day in an average year. These conditions are so hot they exceed the National Weather Service's heat index scale. They historically have affected less than 1% of the U.S. in an average year.

  • The number of days per year that feel like 105°F or hotter is eight times higher than it has been historically. Every major city in Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa — and a total of more than 290 populous U.S. cities (greater than 50,000 people) — swelters for the equivalent of a month of such conditions in an average year. [Map showing cities with 30+ days of 105+ conditions (late century, no action)]

  • Every major city in Michigan experiences 30 or more days per year with a heat index above 100°F, except Muskegon, which averages 29. (Cities in Wisconsin and Minnesota are no better off.)

  • Residents of Tampa, Florida, Laredo, Texas, and 15 more large cities in Florida and Texas endure 150 days or more per year with a heat index above 100°F.


With no action to reduce emissions, by late century large swaths of the Sunbelt would experience more than 100 days per year with a heat index above 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

  • Famously cool places average 30 days or more with a heat index above 90°F: Seattle, Washington (30); Portland, Maine (48); Portland, Oregon (53). (In Seattle, two-thirds of homes currently lack air-conditioning.)

  • In more than 80 counties across Texas and Florida, in an average year, the heat index is above 90°F for half the year (180 days). In broad strokes, that means that spring is very hot, fall is very hot, and summer can be downright deadly.

It's an unfathomably hot future, and it's the one we're on track to hand off to our children and grandchildren. Where do we encourage our children to settle down in this world? Will it be safe for their children play outside in the summer? And what do we tell Gen Z today when they strike and march and plead with us to change course?

Choosing a Safer Future

As my coauthors and I began to dig more deeply into our results, a second potential future came into clearer focus: In this future, rapid, aggressive action to reduce global emissions has limited global warming to 2°C above pre-industrial temperatures. These ambitious actions still lead to a future in which the number of days with a dangerously high heat index above 105°F is nearly four times what it is today, and 85 of the bigger U.S. cities would endure a month or more of such conditions.

Clearly, we need to be aiming for even greater, even faster cuts to our emissions. Yet limiting future warming to 2°C would yield a future far more recognizable to today's children than the one we're recklessly barreling toward, in which 290 cities suffer under such heat.

Rapidly and aggressively reducing emissions would limit the number of cities that would experience 30 days or more per year with a heat index above 105 degrees Fahrenheit.

That's the future I have to focus on so I can sleep at night. Ensuring this safer future will require us to act on two major fronts: reducing emissions swiftly so that we can achieve net-zero carbon emissions by midcentury and limit future global warming; and building our resilience to extreme heat through a suite of common sense measures that include enacting a national heat safety standard for outdoor workers and ensuring that communities have heat warning systems in place that draw on the best available public health information.

This future may be the next-best thing to the one we'd ideally hand off to our children, but it's a hell of a lot better than the one we're currently heading toward. The best time to boldly begin pursuing this safer future was 20 years ago. The next-best time is now.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+2 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-07-23 07:18
It may be that the US is already a dystopian hellscape. And it has been for a long time. Just depends on your point of view. If you are an Arab and live in the Middle East or in the US, then clearly the US is a hellscape.

I have serious doubts about two things:

1. that a "rapid, aggressive action to reduce global emissions" will stave off the ravages of global warming. I think the damage has already been done. No reduction we make will have much effect. It is too late. We are on the Titanic.

2. that Americans can or will ever choose to make a "rapid, aggressive action to reduce global emissions" in any way at all. They just won't do it no matter what the predictions are.


With those two doubts, I can see no other future than that the US will be a dystopian hellscape by 2070. I think this author should just give up sleeping at night. That's a luxury of the distant past. All she can hope for is that her predictive models are just wrong or that weather is more complex than she and her scientist colleagues have imagines. In short, being wrong is her only hope.
 
 
+3 # Texas Aggie 2019-07-23 07:20
Cue the deniers.

One thing "good" about what we are facing now is that a lot of the people responsible are going to get socked with the heat. The red states primarily in the south are suffering and enough harm will be done that they won't forget it soon. While there is the strong psychological drive to deny something that is contrary to your worldview, once you get slapped in the face often enough, your worldview starts to change.
 
 
+1 # lfeuille 2019-07-23 17:44
Yet, but they're in the Bibile Belt. Some charlatan will convince them they can pray their way out of it.
 
 
0 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-07-24 07:28
TA -- " once you get slapped in the face often enough, your worldview starts to change."


Has this happened in Texas? Have the stopped driving those enormous diesel-smoke-sp ewing pick up trucks? I doubt it. I doubt Texans will ever give up their pick up trucks. They will be driving the right into the Hellscape at 6-8 miles per gallon.