RSN Fundraising Banner
ACLU Files Lawsuit to Block Sweeping Asylum Ban
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48813"><span class="small">Ted Hesson, Politico</span></a>   
Wednesday, 17 July 2019 08:20

Hesson writes: "The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit today to halt a sweeping new regulation that cuts off asylum for migrants who passed through another country en route to the U.S.-Mexico border."

Migrants shield themselves from dust while being detained after crossing to the U.S. side of the U.S.-Mexico border barrier in May in El Paso, Texas. (photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Migrants shield themselves from dust while being detained after crossing to the U.S. side of the U.S.-Mexico border barrier in May in El Paso, Texas. (photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)


ACLU Files Lawsuit to Block Sweeping Asylum Ban

By Ted Hesson, Politico

17 July 19

 

he American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit today to halt a sweeping new regulation that cuts off asylum for migrants who passed through another country en route to the U.S.-Mexico border.

The ACLU — representing four advocacy organizations — argued that President Donald Trump’s latest crackdown violates federal immigration and regulatory laws.

“This is the Trump administration’s most extreme run at an asylum ban yet,” said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt in a related announcement. “It clearly violates domestic and international law, and cannot stand.”

The departments of Justice and Homeland Security announced a new fast-track rule Monday that will block asylum for any migrants who first pass through another country without applying for protections. The regulation would nullify the majority of asylum claims, including those of Central Americans fleeing persecution in their home countries.

In the lawsuit, which was filed in the Northern District of California, the ACLU argued the new regulation “is a part of an unlawful effort to significantly undermine, if not virtually repeal, the U.S. asylum system.”

The civil rights group contends the rule violates federal asylum law, which makes protections available to immigrants whether or not they arrive at a port of entry. In addition, they assert the administration ran afoul of regulatory guidelines when it issued the sweeping change immediately and without a thorough public process.

A federal judge in November temporarily halted a similar Trump policy that blocked migrants who cross between ports of entry from seeking asylum.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+1 # DongiC 2019-07-17 10:10
Trump, the desperate , is willing to try extreme measures to stop the immigrant flow. Watch for mistakes in his normal routines as he staggers form one misconception to another. The President is starting to feel the pressure. I wonder whose head will roll next.
 
 
+1 # BetaTheta 2019-07-17 10:48
Einstein came via Belgium and England en route to his American exile in 1933.