RSN Fundraising Banner
Democrats Divided as Pressure to Impeach Builds: 'What Are You Waiting For?'
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49764"><span class="small">Eric Lutz, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Sunday, 30 June 2019 08:40

Lutz writes: "In the House of Representatives the apparently frustrated Democratic congresswoman Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, had one question for the leadership of her party: when would they impeach Donald Trump?"

Nancy Pelosi. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Nancy Pelosi. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Democrats Divided as Pressure to Impeach Builds: 'What Are You Waiting For?'

By Eric Lutz, Guardian UK

30 June 19

Dozens of Democrats have called for Trump impeachment proceedings in wake of Mueller’s report – but Pelosi has remained steadfast in opposing an inquiry

n the House of Representatives the apparently frustrated Democratic congresswoman Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, had one question for the leadership of her party: when would they impeach Donald Trump?

“The thing that we’re struggling with is that we don’t know what we’re waiting for in terms of a caucus. And folks that are saying, ‘No, not yet. Not yet.’ OK – accepting that that’s your position, what are you waiting for?” the New York socialist said to reporters this week. “Are you waiting for some kind of revelation?”

That’s a question a growing number of Democrats are asking. Dozens of Democrats on Capitol Hill, including 2020 hopefuls such as Elizabeth Warren, have called for impeachment proceedings in the wake of the special counsel Robert Mueller’s damning report into Russia interference in the 2016 election, which also outlined numerous instances of obstruction of justice on the part of the president.

Nor is it just leftwing firebrands like Ocasio-Cortez. One notable recent convert to the impeachment cause was California congresswoman Katie Porter, who announced her support by admitting: “I didn’t come to Congress to impeach the president.” But Porter added: “When faced with a crisis of this magnitude, I cannot with a clean conscience ignore my duty to defend the constitution.”

Porter’s support struck a chord in Washington because, as the representative of a swing district, her announcement carried personal political risk. Most others who have called for impeachment hail from safely blue districts. Only one Republican – Michigan congressman Justin Amash – has signed up to the cause.

The question now is, will the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, succumb to the growing pressure, or will she stand her ground? It is a fierce debate that is increasingly dividing the party, pitting pragmatists against ideologues, the leadership against its own members and advocates of policy who believe they have a constitutional duty to act against wrongdoing against those who prefer to wage politics and want to remove Trump by thrashing him at the 2020 ballot box.

Pelosi has so far remained steadfast in opposing an impeachment inquiry on the grounds such a move would fail in the Republican-controlled Senate and could be politically divisive, potentially jeopardizing Democrats’ chances at ousting Trump via the ballot box in 2020.

In March, she said in an interview with the Washington Post that impeachment would be “so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path”.

A four-page summary later that month of Mueller’s report by William Barr, the Mueller critic Trump installed as attorney general, made that position seem prescient. Barr wrote in a letter to lawmakers that Mueller did not establish collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government and that he’d punted on the issue of obstruction. Barr and his then deputy, Rod Rosenstein, cleared Trump of charges that he sought to interfere with the inquiry.

But in April, Barr released a redacted version of Mueller’s 448-page report that revealed his initial summary – and a bizarre, pre-publication press conference in which the attorney general sought to spin the findings like he was a member of Trump’s defense team – to be wildly misleading.

On the question of obstruction of justice, Mueller laid out a series of episodes in which Trump personally sought to undermine the investigation, including by firing former FBI director James Comey and attempting to fire the special counsel himself. The reason Trump was not charged with a crime, Mueller implied, is because he did not believe justice department protocol allowed for a sitting president to be indicted.

Holding the president accountable, he suggested, would necessarily be Congress, not the criminal justice system.

For some Democrats, like the congressman and 2020 presidential candidate Eric Swalwell, that was a call to action.

“The congressman is concentrated on protecting our democracy and believes that a fair process will either remove a corrupt president or acquit him but inaction is no longer an option,” a representative for Swalwell said.

The momentum behind impeachment may be having some impact. Pelosi has introduced the word into her vocabulary as of late, implying that she was keeping the door open to the possibility.

But she has also stayed the course, tamping down criticism from her ranks that it’s Congress’s duty to hold the president accountable – regardless of whether it would succeed or not.

Instead, she has called for Democrats to press on with their investigations, as well as to focus on kitchen table issues such as healthcare, which helped them take back the House in the 2018 midterms and can, she hopes, propel them to victory again in 2020.

As the 2020 race heats up – the Democrats have had their first televised debate and Trump has officially launched his campaign – it is hard to say what Democrats will, or should, do.

On the one hand, impeachment could prove divisive. While a growing majority of Democratic voters support such a move, some polls suggest that Americans overall remain split on the matter. There are fears that impeachment could backfire on Democrats in 2020 and gift Trump another four years in office are not completely unfounded. After all, Republicans lost House seats in 1998 and 2000 as they pursued the impeachment of Bill Clinton – something that has weighed on Pelosi, her colleagues told the Atlantic.

Those losses are often overstated, however, and the situations are different, both in terms of the two presidents’ statures in the public’s eye and the nature of their conduct. Clinton, who retained high approval ratings during the course of his proceedings, was impeached over conduct largely unrelated to his presidency.

Trump, on the other hand, has seen underwater job approval ratings for the entire duration of his presidency. What’s more, the justification for his potential impeachment cuts to the heart of his duties as president. Trump has not only continued to insist he did nothing wrong and to block oversight investigations – he also said in a stunning interview recently that he would welcome foreign interference in the 2020 election if he thought it could help him win.

Though Democrats appear uniformly frustrated and outraged by Trump’s conduct, some aren’t yet ready to greenlight impeachment.

“I’m not yet calling to start an impeachment inquiry,” Florida congressman Ted Deutch, a Democrat on the House judiciary committee, told the Guardian. “But I will also not keep waiting as the White House engages in this unprecedented stonewalling. Obstruction of an investigation of obstruction of justice is itself obstruction of justice.”

For more than 70 lawmakers and counting, though, it’s time to start moving on the matter – both as a practical way of holding the president accountable and as an ethical and constitutional responsibility to send a message that nobody is above the law, even if they sit in the Oval Office.

“The administration has refused to respect the rule of law,” Porter said announcing her support for an impeachment inquiry.

“The question is not whether a crisis is in our midst,” she continued, “but rather whether we choose to fight against it.”

Email This Page your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Sunday, 30 June 2019 09:31


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+7 # DongiC 2019-06-30 10:05
If we can't impeach a President as dishonest as Donald Trump, how will we ever win the fight over global warming. We will never be able to defeat the fossil fuel boys and the operators of coal mines. There comes a time when courage is the most important virtue. That time is now!
+3 # librarian1984 2019-07-01 04:35
Why didn't we impeach Obama for destruction in Honduras and Libya?

Why didn't we impeach W and his Dick for the Iraq War and profiteering?

Why didn't we impeach Bill Clinton for betraying blacks, the poor and the Democratic Party?

Why didn't we impeach GHWB for what he did to the Kurds?

Why didn't we impeach Reagan for Iran-Contra and his handling of the AIDS crisis?

Why doesn't half the electorate vote?

Why does almost nothing the people want get enacted, but almost everything the 1% wants does?

Why does the media help lie US into warS?

Why do people tolerate the corruption of government and the malignant power of corporations?

Wealth and power are consistently concentrated in the hands of a few merciless inbred sociopaths and their psychopathic 10% enablers.

Read the Powell Memorandum. Read 'Crisis of Democracy'.

Don't believe everything CNN, Fox or MSDNC tell you. Find more honest news.

Talk to your neighbors, even the Trump supporters. Talk less, listen more.

Trump is not even the worst president we'll get if we don't concern ourselves with the future, not just defeating Trump but fixing our own party.

The media is trying to convince US that only a 'moderate' can beat Trump, by which they mean a DINO, when it's only progressives who have the ideas that will get people to vote and even change parties.

A populist economic agenda will defeat Trump, which Pelosi doesn't support. Stop trusting this party.
0 # lfeuille 2019-07-02 21:46
First of all, no president, Trump or anyone else will be impeached for starting a war. It just doesn't happen. But Trumps other clear violations of US, not international, law are so numerous and obvious that not moving against him in the only way legally possible (impeachment) makes us look like fools at best or co-conspirators at worst. All the presidents you mentioned did bad things but Trump has far and away done worse things and more of them.
-5 # HenryS1 2019-06-30 12:41
I hope Pelosi stands her ground. She will get the timing right for impeachment if she is allowed to make that decision without revealing her strategy to her opposition.

She will impeach when that has the best chance of reining in Trump. Let her decide when.

Right now polling shows that impeachment now would hurt Democrats and help Trump, but that is shifting slowly in a positive direction.

The more time passes, the better the evidence that would be part of impeachment. The House digs deeper and finds more, and Trump commits more "crimes and misdemeanors". At a future point, perhaps in the middle of the immediate pre-election period, the timing will be much better.

Trump hinting at "President for Life" and a third term shows where he is going. If the economy loses health, then Trump will blame impeachment rather than accepting responsibility himself. Ditto the stock market.
+3 # RLF 2019-07-01 05:05
Yeah...Sure the establishment Dems have had their finger on the pulse of the electorate so exactly! I'm SURE Pelosi knows exactly when to go...

(sarcastic tone implied)
-4 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-07-01 10:04
HS1 -- I don't think the timing will ever be right. It is too late for impeachment. Mueller diddled around for two years and no one wanted to start impeachment until he finished. He diddled and produced nothing.

I hear over and over from all but the 76 impeachment democrats that when they go back to their home districts to talk with constituents, they always hear "stop the impeachment/Rus siagate nonsense. There are real problems we face right here in _______ (you fill in the state)."

As the Nov. 2020 election gets closer, the demand among voters for impeachment will diminish. Pelosi knows this. It is really only the major media who don't know it; or, rather, they know it but impeachment drives up their ratings so they publish impeachment stories 24/7. It's "all about the Benjamins." You can ask Rachel Maddow whose viewership has dropped by 30% once Russiagate died.
+8 # chapdrum 2019-06-30 13:29
How bad does it have to get? There are many takeaways from the fact that Congress, and the Courts (and The Owners) are not doing anything to remove him from office.
+1 # lfeuille 2019-06-30 14:20
God, she's such a coward. She makes Democrats look like fools. I wish we had the system used by the British Labour Party where rank and file party members get to elect the party leaders.
+1 # Jude 2019-06-30 22:19
Nancy Pelosi is obstructing justice.
+1 # boredlion 2019-06-30 23:41
“Obstruction of an investigation into obstruction of justice is itself obstruction of justice.” - Ted Deutch

To which Tom Regan ( from “Miller’s Crossing” ) might reply, “If there’s any justice.”
+4 # jcdav 2019-07-01 07:08
An impeachment INVESTIGATION, televised and public, is necessary. We have a right to know what our leaders are/have been doing and for whom. Even if it is NOT politically expedient it is Congress's DUTY to CHECK and balance the Executive branch. Public opinion and the threat to the GOP is the main reason Nixon quit.....