RSN Fundraising Banner
'Climate Apartheid': Rich People to Buy Their Way Out of Environmental Crisis While Poor Suffer, Warns UN
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51065"><span class="small">Tom Batchelor, The Independent</span></a>   
Saturday, 29 June 2019 08:26

Batchelor writes: "Wealthy communities will be able to buy their way out of the unfolding climate crisis while the poorest will suffer most, a UN report has found."

Even under the unrealistic 'best-case' scenario of 1.5C of warming by 2100, many millions of people will have to choose between starvation and migration. (photo: B. Bannon/UNHCR)
Even under the unrealistic 'best-case' scenario of 1.5C of warming by 2100, many millions of people will have to choose between starvation and migration. (photo: B. Bannon/UNHCR)


'Climate Apartheid': Rich People to Buy Their Way Out of Environmental Crisis While Poor Suffer, Warns UN

By Tom Batchelor, The Independent

29 June 19


Millions forced to choose between starvation and migration under 'best-case' scenario of 1.5C of warming by 2100

ealthy communities will be able to buy their way out of the unfolding climate crisis while the poorest will suffer most, a UN report has found.

Even under the unrealistic "best-case" scenario of 1.5C of warming by 2100, many millions of people will have to choose between starvation and migration, Philip Alston, the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights warned.

He predicted a split between those able to mitigate the worst effects of the warming planet and those with no means to avoid it, calling it a "climate apartheid". 

And he said the fallout from our rapidly warming climate would have dire implications for human rights and democracy.

"What was once considered catastrophic warming now seems like a best-case scenario," Mr Alston said.

"While people in poverty are responsible for just a fraction of global emissions, they will bear the brunt of climate change, and have the least capacity to protect themselves. 

“We risk a ‘climate apartheid’ scenario where the wealthy pay to escape overheating, hunger, and conflict while the rest of the world is left to suffer.

"Climate change is, among other things, an unconscionable assault on the poor."

He cited vulnerable New Yorkers being stranded without power or healthcare when Hurricane Sandy hit in 2012, while "the Goldman Sachs headquarters was protected by tens of thousands of its own sandbags and power from its generator".

The poorest half of the world’s population – 3.5 billion people – is responsible for just 10 per cent of carbon emissions, while the richest 10 per cent are responsible for around half of greenhouse gases. 

And a person in the wealthiest 1 per cent uses 175 times more carbon than one in the bottom 10 per cent, an Oxfam report from 2015 found.

There have been some positive developments, with renewable energy prices falling, coal becoming uncompetitive, emissions declining in 49 countries, and 7,000 cities, 245 regions, and 6,000 companies committing to climate mitigation.

However, despite ending its reliance on coal, China – the world's biggest polluter – is still exporting coal-fired power plants and is failing to crack down on its own methane emissions.

Meanwhile Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro plans to open up the Amazon rainforest for mining, end demarcation of indigenous lands, and weaken environmental protection.

Donald Trump has blamed other nations for the crisis despite the US being the world's second biggest polluter. 

“China, India, Russia, many other nations, they have not very good air, not very good water, and the sense of pollution. If you go to certain cities … you can’t even breathe, and now that air is going up … They don’t do the responsibility," he said in an interview earlier in June.

Mr Alston also criticised the "patently inadequate" steps taken by UN human rights bodies to address the climate crisis, saying the "incremental" progress was "entirely disproportionate to the urgency and magnitude of the threat".

"Ticking boxes will not save humanity or the planet from impending disaster," he concluded.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Saturday, 29 June 2019 09:01
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+1 # indian weaving 2019-06-29 09:34
Rich people are far outnunbered by we the starving / disease-ridden / homeless / desperate. WE the People will take out the 1% one by one, homes and relatives. That's how civil war works and is coming to the USA soon. ACD means the end of all life on earth anyhow.
 
 
+3 # DongiC 2019-06-29 10:20
Incredibly, a real disaster is in sight and many, very many of the planet's peoples do not want to get involved. Are they going down without a struggle, without fighting for chance at survival? I won't give up until the bitter end but then, I am in my eighties and, probably only have a decade or two left. But, then, I believe in reincarnation and might come back to a world in acute distress. So, I better work hard right now looking for a cleaner and better environment.
 
 
0 # Allears 2019-06-30 06:47
Those rich enough to believe that they are omnipotent to the point of being above the coming fray are in for tragic comeuppance.The y are ceetainly not reading these words or anything on RSN or any of its ilk,but when the biological systems upon which our biologicallly based life depends is completely broken, there will be no survival for anyone. How long can your personal food supply last, ezpecially whe you are now spending your monetary wealth on yachts, castles and transient pleasures?
The monolithic centralized production and suppply systems will no longer be
functional. This, combined with the total degradion of food, air and water supplies will 'democratize' the eventual disintegration of our means of life. AI, our fausse saviour, will die along with us. Hide in your bunkers all you will-O, Sinnerman, where you gonna run to?
 
 
0 # PABLO DIABLO 2019-06-30 10:52
We used to say, "Eat the Rich". But, now they are toxic.