RSN Fundraising Banner
FEC Chair Rebukes Trump Over Statements on Accepting Election Help From Foreign Governments
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50981"><span class="small">David Knowles, Yahoo News</span></a>   
Friday, 14 June 2019 08:27

Knowles writes: "The head of the Federal Elections Commission issued a thinly veiled rebuke of Donald Trump on Thursday over the president's stance on accepting opposition research from foreign governments on his political adversaries."

Federal Election Commission chief Ellen Weintraub reiterated that foreign assistance is illegal in U.S. elections. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)
Federal Election Commission chief Ellen Weintraub reiterated that foreign assistance is illegal in U.S. elections. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)


FEC Chair Rebukes Trump Over Statements on Accepting Election Help From Foreign Governments

By David Knowles, Yahoo News

14 June 19

 

he head of the Federal Elections Commission issued a thinly veiled rebuke of Donald Trump on Thursday over the president’s stance on accepting opposition research from foreign governments on his political adversaries.

Ellen Weintraub, the FEC chair, expressed her disbelief that Trump believed accepting foreign assistance in a U.S. political election was permissible.

In an interview with ABC News, the president made clear that he saw nothing wrong with accepting dirt on his political rivals obtained by foreign governments. He also dismissed the idea that he should immediately contact the FBI after receiving any foreign offer of help.

“They have information — I think I’d take it,” Trump said. “If I thought there was something wrong, I’d go maybe to the FBI — if I thought there was something wrong. But when somebody comes up with oppo research, right, they come up with oppo research, ‘Oh let’s call the FBI.’ The FBI doesn’t have enough agents to take care of it.”

While Weintraub emphasized that Trump’s position was indeed against U.S. law and that foreign governments seeking to influence American elections did so for their own benefit, other critics noted that accepting such help also came with a price. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., made that point on Wednesday night.

Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, was one of the view voices in his party to decry Trump’s near solicitation of foreign election meddling.

“That would be simply unthinkable for a candidate for president to accept that involvement, to encourage it, to participate with it in any way, shape or form,” Romney told reporters Thursday. “It would strike at the very heart of our democracy,”

Even Fox News host Brian Kilmeade found Trump’s ethical formulation troubling.

“You don’t want a foreign government or foreign entity giving you information because they will want something back,” Kilmeade said on “Fox & Friends” Thursday morning. “If anybody knows that it is the president. There is no free lunch. If someone wants information they want influence. I think the president’s got to clarify that. … He opened himself wide up to attacks.”

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election found multiple contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. Since the investigation was launched, however, Trump has regularly declared that there was “no collusion” between his campaign and Moscow.

Weintraub has clashed with Trump before, calling on the president to back up his claim that voter fraud in the 2016 Senate race in New Hampshire had cost Republican incumbent Kelly Ayotte her seat.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
-5 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-06-14 13:03
Did this FEC director decry the Clinton campaign's soliciting foreign dirt on Trump. The Clinton campaign even laundered the money it paid for this campaign dirt via a law firm that hired a NY research company which then hired a British intelligence officer who called on a paid sources he knew inside the Russian government for stories about Trump. In all this, the development of this "oppo research" was aided by intelligence agencies from Australis, the UK, Ukraine, and Israel.

Was this ever even investigated as a mis-use of campaign funds? The amounts spent on the development of this oppo research have ranged from a low of about $1 million to a high of about $10 million. Who paid the money? Was it not an illegal political campaign contribution?

It is just idiotic beyond belief to talk about Trump's response to a hypothetical when we have had the real thing looming over heads for three years. The Clinton campaign's use of foreign governments and foreign spy agencies is like the 800 pound gorilla in the room. No one will talk about it.