RSN Fundraising Banner
Trump: If Offered Dirt by Foreign Government on 2020 Rival, 'I Think I'd Take It'
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36318"><span class="small">Jessica Taylor, NPR</span></a>   
Thursday, 13 June 2019 08:30

Taylor writes: "President Trump says he might accept dirt from another country on his potential Democratic rivals if offered, raising new questions and concerns about foreign influence on American elections."

Anti-Trump protest in Manhattan. (photo: Scott Lynch/Gothamist)
Anti-Trump protest in Manhattan. (photo: Scott Lynch/Gothamist)

Trump: If Offered Dirt by Foreign Government on 2020 Rival, 'I Think I'd Take It'

By Jessica Taylor, NPR

13 June 19


resident Trump says he might accept dirt from another country on his potential Democratic rivals if offered, raising new questions and concerns about foreign influence on American elections.

"It's not an interference, they have information — I think I'd take it," Trump said. "If I thought there was something wrong, I'd go maybe to the FBI — if I thought there was something wrong."

Trump made the comments in an Oval Office interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos, after being pressed about the Trump Tower meeting in June 2016 with Russians and Trump officials. Ahead of that meeting, which former special counsel Robert Mueller probed, the Trump campaign was offered damaging information on Trump's opponent, Hillary Clinton.

In the ABC interview, the president claimed information offered by a foreign government is the equivalent to "oppo research" that's traditional in American political campaigns. However, such information does not typically come from foreign powers that may be seeking to impact the election results and sow discord — as Russia did in 2016. Trump's own handpicked FBI Director Christopher Wray has said the FBI should be informed of such gestures.

"I'll tell you what, I've seen a lot of things over my life. I don't think in my whole life I've ever called the FBI. In my whole life. You don't call the FBI. You throw somebody out of your office, you do whatever you do," Trump said. "Oh, give me a break — life doesn't work that way."

Trump also said he might both accept the information and call the FBI. But the president was clear he disagreed with comments Wray made to Congress just last month that "if any public official or member of any campaign is contacted by any nation state or anybody acting on behalf of a nation state about influencing or interfering with our election, then that is something the FBI would want to know about it."

"The FBI director is wrong, because frankly it doesn't happen like that in life," Trump said. "Now maybe it will start happening, maybe today you'd think differently."

On Wednesday, Donald Trump Jr. returned for a second interview before the Senate Intelligence Committee about the 2016 meeting that he and members of the Trump campaign, including White House adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, attended. Lawmakers subpoenaed Trump Jr. because of discrepancies between his testimony and that of other witnesses in the Russia investigation. Trump Jr. said afterward that there was no need to amend his previous testimony.

Trump advisers have defended the meeting. Asked whether he would call the FBI if the situation repeated itself, Kushner told Axios earlier this month: "I don't know. It's hard to do hypotheticals, but the reality is is that we were not given anything that was salacious." Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani told CNN in April that "there's nothing wrong with taking information from Russians."

After Trump's comments Wednesday evening, former CIA Director John Brennan — a frequent Trump critic the president has often bashed — tweeted that this was simply more evidence that the president is "an existential threat" to the U.S., as Biden has alleged during his campaign for the Democratic nomination.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+2 # wilhelmscream 2019-06-13 09:09
-4 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-06-13 13:55
Trump's is a good response. Hillary sure as hell accepted dirt from foreign governments on Trump. She got dirt from the UK, Russia, Ukraine, Australia, and Israel. And then somehow she got the US FBI, CIA, and State Departments to work this dirt over in their own internal processes. The mass media ran with this foreign dirt as if it were pure gold. We are not finished with it yet.

Clinton set the bar in 2016. I expect that 2020 will be even worse.
0 # DongiC 2019-06-14 03:30
Without a doubt Trump would accept dirt from the Russians or anybody on an opponent. Trump is a dirty player, everybody knows that. That's how much our culture has declined, when a president can proclaim his lack of character and not be ashamed. Truly sad!