RSN Fundraising Banner
Joe Biden's Lead Slips as Elizabeth Warren Surges, Iowa Poll Shows
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=29504"><span class="small">Martin Pengelly, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Sunday, 09 June 2019 13:54

Pengelly writes: "On the heels of a major Iowa poll which showed a big slip in his big lead over the Democratic field, Joe Biden was conspicuous by his absence from the guest list for a big party event in the state on Sunday."

Joe Biden. (photo: Getty Images)
Joe Biden. (photo: Getty Images)

Joe Biden's Lead Slips as Elizabeth Warren Surges, Iowa Poll Shows

By Martin Pengelly, Guardian UK

09 June 19

Former VP at 24% and Sanders second on 16%, but Massachusetts senator and Buttigieg close behind as race tightens

n the heels of a major Iowa poll which showed a big slip in his big lead over the Democratic field, Joe Biden was conspicuous by his absence from the guest list for a big party event in the state on Sunday.

Nineteen candidates for the presidential nomination are due to speak at the Democratic Party Hall of Fame dinner in Cedar Rapids, among them leading contenders Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg and Kamala Harris.

Biden, who is attending his granddaughter’s graduation, will not be among them. He is due to visit Ottumwa, Iowa, on Tuesday – the same day Donald Trump will visit Council Bluffs and Des Moines.

In the poll released by CNN and the Des Moines Register on Saturday night, the former Delaware senator and vice-president led the 23-strong field in the early voting state by eight clear points. But he only polled at 24%, down from his usual 30%-plus.

Sanders was second with 16%, ahead of Warren with 15% and Buttigieg with 14%. Harris was the only other candidate above 5%, with half as much support as Buttigieg.

The former Texas congressman Beto O’Rourke and the Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar were the only other candidates to get more than 1% support among likely caucus participants. Both attracted 2%. Higher-profile candidates attracting no support whatsoever included New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand and New York City mayor Bill de Blasio.

The poll also showed that voters who identify as liberal now favour Warren, and that the primary concern among respondents is who will be best placed to beat Trump.

“That’s a strong showing for Elizabeth Warren,” Ann Selzer, president of the eponymous company which conducted the poll, told the Des Moines Register. “I think that all of the publicity lately and all of the polls lately are so Biden-heavy that for her to have any metric that shows her on par [with him] … it says to me there are people who are paying attention [and] in a field this big, that’s step one. First, you have to get people to pay attention.”

On Sunday, Sanders sought to deflect questions about his disagreements with Biden or the importance of any poll so far out from the caucuses, which will be held on 3 February next year.

“We’re not going to get 50% of the vote in Iowa,” the Vermont senator told CNN’s State of the Union, comparing the contest to 2016, when he went toe-to-toe with the narrow winner, Hillary Clinton.

“I don’t think anybody will. I think we have an excellent chance to win here, we’re going to win in New Hampshire, and I think we have a very strong chance of being the candidate who will defeat the worst president in the modern history of this country, Donald Trump.”

One of the candidates with 2% in Iowa, Klobuchar, told CBS's Face the Nation she could build support by being a midwestern senator “running on a track record of getting things done”.

“I’m clearly on the debate stage and expect to be there in the fall,” she said. “And I think that’s going to give opportunity to voters in Iowa and all across the country to really narrow it down.”

Her fellow two-percenter, O’Rourke, a charismatic candidate whose polling numbers have nonetheless gone into reverse, also played down the Iowa poll.

“If I relied on polls in any race that I’d run,” he told ABC’s This Week, “I never would have been able to serve in the United States Congress. We never would have tried to take on Ted Cruz.”

That was a reference to the 2018 Texas Senate race which O’Rourke lost to a Republican incumbent. Asked why he thought he was the man to beat Trump, the former congressman focused on his roots in a strongly Republican state and his stance against the president on the hot-button issue of immigration.

“The fact that we can bring Texas and its 38 electoral votes with us shows that we are best prepared to take on Donald Trump,” he said, “to defeat him in November of 2020 and then to bring this very divided country back together again in January of 2021.”

Biden has so far focused on states where he polls strongly against Trump, including his native Pennsylvania and the post-industrial “rust belt” where the president beat Hillary Clinton on his way to victory in the electoral college despite a near-3-million-ballot defeat in the popular vote.

In an interview with the Guardian published on Sunday, Bruce Haines, a former steel executive and Trump supporter from Northampton county, Pennsylvania, pointed to a main issue of contention in Democratic ranks nationwide.

Should the party pick a progressive with bold policy ideas, such as Sanders or Warren, or should it opt for Biden or O’Rourke, centrists with high name recognition in blue-collar or Republican-leaning states away from the liberal coasts?

“So I think support [for Trump] is going to strengthen as we get closer to the election,” Haines said. “And as we sort out who he’s going to run against – will it be a socialist, or will it be Biden?”

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

0 # DongiC 2019-06-09 19:03
Since our survival is at stake, it had better be a Socialist. Warren or Sanders or both.
+7 # librarian1984 2019-06-10 04:05
Biden is just as arrogant and detached as Clinton was. The 'Friendly Uncle Joe' will soon morph into 'Creepy Uncle Joe', as more and more videos of him surface. He's never been a very successful campaigner; soon enough he'll say a few dozen offensive, stupid and/or ignorant things. It's what Joe Biden does, and the people are in no mood for it.

The myth of Biden's 'electability' is just the latest media attempt at manipulation, though undoubtedly some of TPTB are expecting him to flame out, as usual, and they'll make sure he's let it be known before he goes that he considers Kamala Harris his righteous (but more PC) successor, because that's who they really want.

We are in for more than a year of shenanigans like this, with the msm dancing as ordered to whatever tune the psychopath oligarchs decide to play. The only way to survive it and get to the truth is to reject the machinations of inbred sociopaths and their media enablers, focused on the horse race and scandals.

I do not want rsn to run bs articles on who's ahead of whom this week. I don't want Nate Silver's corrupted smears, David Brock's wheedles or Rachel Maddow crying.

I want to read about issues and policy, and honest comparisons between the candidates.
+6 # librarian1984 2019-06-10 06:18
In the discussion segment after Sanders' interview there were the usual pundits, people like Bill Kristol, who has a batting average of .004 but is still invited on to bleat his spiel. He said Sanders is 'weak', another talking head that he's not exciting enough.

These are the same people who told us Bill Clinton's speeches were too long, that Howard Dean was a maniac, that Hillary would beat Trump, that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

One said Bernie keeps repeating himself. They really do not get it. People are overwhelmed and desperate. The media will continue to beat these memes and deny us actual information, and they have done their best to sabotage alternative media, but this is a long enough primary that the people WILL have a chance to compare policies and appreciate steadfastness.

We have our jobs to do too. Talk to people about Bernie. Be like him. Be plain spoken and dwell on policy and justice.

I talk to many people every day, including angry older white blue collar workers, and Bernie is the only Democrat they'd consider. If the party were honestly interested in nominating someone who could draw Trump supporters or mythical moderate Republicans, they would support Sanders. Instead they see him as a threat to their cushy status quo.

Imagine if we fought every race the way we fought Roy Moore, the party at our side instead of leading us over a cliff. THEY need to unite behind Bernie, not fight US.
+2 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-06-10 06:32
I'm not surprised to see Biden dropping in the polls. But I am surprised to see Warren rising. As she makes her views more clear, they are less attractive. I think she's a good person and candidate, but she's just too much of an economic conservative for me.

Beto, Buttagig, Harris and all the rest of the right wing democrats will disappear soon enough. It will be good to see all of them in the first debate but I don't think they can go a lot farther than that.

It is beginning to get interesting.
0 # ddd-rrr 2019-06-10 09:41
"Hey, hey, Warren and Buttigieg all the way!" 8^)