RSN Fundraising Banner
Tech Giant Brings Software to a Gun Fight
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50884"><span class="small">Jay Greene, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Thursday, 30 May 2019 13:35

Green writes: "Business-software giant Salesforce instituted a new policy barring retail customers from using its technology to sell semiautomatic weapons and some other firearms."

Rifles for sale at a Virginia store. (photo: Jim Watson/Getty)
Rifles for sale at a Virginia store. (photo: Jim Watson/Getty)


Tech Giant Brings Software to a Gun Fight

By Jay Greene, The Washington Post

30 May 19

 

n its website, Salesforce.com touts retailer Camping World as a leading customer of its business software, highlighting its use of products to help sales staff move product. A Camping World executive is even quoted calling Salesforce’s software “magic.”

But behind the scenes in recent weeks, the Silicon Valley tech giant has delivered a different message to gun-selling retailers such as Camping World: Stop selling military-style rifles, or stop using our software.

The pressure Salesforce is exerting on those retailers — barring them from using its technology to market products, manage customer service operations and fulfill orders — puts them in a difficult position. Camping World, for example, spends more than $1 million a year on Salesforce’s e-commerce software, according to one analyst estimate. Switching to another provider now could cost the company double that to migrate data, reconfigure systems and retrain employees.

The change in Salesforce’s acceptable-use policy shows how a technology giant that is mostly unknown to the public is trying to influence what retailers in America sell and alter the dynamics of a charged social issue. While Salesforce is hardly a household name, it is a dominant provider of software and services that help businesses manage their customers. With roughly 40,000 employees and a market value of nearly $120 billion, it has become a behemoth in San Francisco. Its branded skyscraper also towers over the city as the tallest building and a major landmark.

But its decision to force its position on guns on retailers did not sit well with some industry advocates. These types of rules are “corporate-policy virtue signaling” and discriminate against gun owners, whose rights are protected by the Second Amendment, said Mark Oliva, public affairs director of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a firearms trade group.

“It is a very chilling effect when a company as large as Salesforce puts out a policy like this,” Oliva said. “A policy like this is not surprising from a company based in that part of the country.”

Salesforce’s new policy bars customers that sell a range of firearms — including automatic and semiautomatic — from using its e-commerce technology. The policy also precludes customers from selling some firearm parts, such as “magazines capable of accepting more than 10 rounds” and “multi-burst trigger devices.”

The change affects “a small number of existing customers when their current contracts expire,” as well as all new customers, Salesforce spokeswoman Gina Sheibley said. She declined to name specific customers, but Camping World’s Gander Outdoor unit sells a variety of semiautomatic firearms and high-capacity magazines. Camping World executives didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment.

Gun sales have become a political flash point for retailers in the aftermath of shootings such as the one this month in Colorado. This year, Dick’s Sporting Goods said it would pull guns and ammunition off the shelves of 125 of its 720 stores, a move that the company acknowledged in a March securities filing led to “an accelerated decline” in its hunting business. Walmart ended the sales of military-style firearms in 2015, and last year it raised the minimum age for purchasing firearms and ammunition from 18 to 21.

Even companies that have no gun-related business are taking a stand. Levi Strauss & Co. pledged more than $1 million in September to support nonprofits and youth activists working to end gun violence. Two months later, Toms Shoes pledged $5 million to similar organizations.

When tech giants enter the broader debate, the consequences are magnified because of the critical services they provide behind the scenes to customers. Consumers often don’t realize they’re interacting with other companies when they place an item in their shopping cart or chat with a customer service representative. But Salesforce and other big tech companies wield significant influence because of that reliance on their software.

This type of activism has also led to criticism of tech companies overstepping their bounds. Facebook, Google and Twitter have all faced increased scrutiny of censorship of what they deem hate speech or dangerous individuals. Web-security provider Cloudflare faced criticism in 2017 that it denied free-speech rights after pulling its protection from a neo-Nazi website involved in organizing the white-supremacist rally in Charlottesville.

Salesforce’s new policy could prove controversial in conservative states, said Stifel Nicolaus analyst Tom Roderick, who provided the estimates of Camping World’s spending on the company’s e-commerce software. “Does this become a hot-button issue in states where people like their assault rifles?” Roderick said.

It’s not Salesforce’s first experience with social activism. The company also provides technology that helps power the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency’s border activities and agent recruiting, something that drew increasing scrutiny as the agency implemented Trump administration policies that included separating families at the U.S.-Mexico border. Last summer, roughly 650 Salesforce employees signed a letter to co-chief executive Marc Benioff raising concerns about the agency’s use of its products, first reported by Bloomberg News.

The company hired an executive in December to run its new Office of Ethical and Humane Use to guide development and sales of its products. It’s unclear whether the new executive helped develop the firearm policy.

Benioff has been among the most outspoken CEOs regarding social and political issues, including a tweet last year a day after the mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla., left 17 people dead.

“The AR-15 is the most popular rifle in America. Ban it,” he wrote.

A month later, he pledged $1 million to March for Our Lives, a group pushing for gun-control legislation.

At the 2018 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Benioff suggested social media companies such as Facebook should be regulated like Big Tobacco because of their similarly addictive natures.

He also publicly campaigned against a controversial Indiana law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, in 2015, arguing it could lead to discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Salesforce, which had 1,400 employees in Indianapolis at the time, threatened to “dramatically reduce” the company’s investments in the state, before the legislature eventually amended the law.

Benioff declined to comment on the company’s new policy regarding gun sales.

Salesforce isn’t the only provider of e-commerce software to take a stand on gun sales. Shopify, which powers over 800,000 online shopping sites, also amended its acceptable-use policy last year to bar customers from using its technology to sell weapons such as automatic and semiautomatic firearms.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+1 # chrisconno 2019-05-31 00:19
Well maybe some good is coming out of the religious overreach of the Hobby Lobby case. Since we can't get our politicians to pass some much needed for the good of all gun control laws then somebody has to stand up for what's right. Things like this can get out of hand though where corporations are the arbiters. Hobby Lobby is.
 
 
+3 # PaineRad 2019-05-31 01:34
As far as the gun is concerned, if you want to prevent rapid-fire weapons from killing a lot of people, just ban open bottomed receivers. All ammo must be loaded from the top or side into semi-automatic rifles. With regard to rifles with a tube below the barrel, limit its capacity to something like three to five rounds. Banning large capacity magazines looks good in headlines but is far too easy to circumvent.

When casting the receiver, cast the bottom closed. Period. All done.
 
 
-7 # lorenbliss 2019-05-31 01:48
This is exactly the sort of forcible, extra-Constitut ional civilian disarmament that -- if our Capitalist masters have their malevolent way -- will leave us utterly defenseless against the ever-burgeoning ChristoNazi threat.

The plan? Totally disarm the non-white, non-Christian, USian proletariat, reducing all of us in the 99 Percent to compulsory pacifism and mandatory victimhood.

And they're doing it -- that is, racing to subjugate us -- before we the people can even organize for effective defense against the government-alli ed ChristoNazis, much less organize for the socialist revolution that must occur if we are to save ourselves from extinction.

Alas, just as World War II proved – a theme reinforced by The Chinese, Cuban and Vietnamese experiences -- you don't vanquish the fascists unless you take up arms against them. Which means that, lacking some miracle, a second U.S. Civil War is probably inevitable.

Thus as any person capable of logical analysis will recognize, what the One Percenters are doing to us by forcibly disarming us is condemning us all to the living-death nightmare of forever inescapable ChristoNazi tyranny.
 
 
+3 # tedrey 2019-05-31 05:34
Very good. Enforcing such services on companies because "people like their assault rifles" is feeding a dangerous addiction.
 
 
+1 # Questioner 2019-06-01 22:05
If they chose not to business with people they don't like, isn't it their right to do that? Just like not baking cakes etc for people you find don't suit your morals. Right? A concerted effort by companies and individuals to criminalize tens of millions of people they don't like. What could possibly be wrong with that?