RSN Fundraising Banner
Supreme Court Takes Up Case of Mexican Teen Shot by Border Patrol
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=33791"><span class="small">teleSUR</span></a>   
Wednesday, 29 May 2019 12:40

Excerpt: "The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to review for the second time a lawsuit over the case of a Mexican teen shot dead inside Mexico by a Border Patrol Agent firing from the U.S. side of the frontier."

Border Patrol officer. (photo: Getty)
Border Patrol officer. (photo: Getty)


Supreme Court Takes Up Case of Mexican Teen Shot by Border Patrol

By teleSUR

29 May 19


The case, likely to be argued in the fall of this year or early 2020, could set a precedent for other cases of shootings of migrants on either side of the border by U.S. officials.

he U.S. Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to review for the second time a lawsuit over the case of a Mexican teen shot dead inside Mexico by a Border Patrol Agent firing from the U.S. side of the frontier.

The family of Sergio Hernandez, who was 15 when he was killed by U.S. agent Jesus Mesa on June 7, 2010, has been seeking compensation over the death in a lawsuit.

Hernandez and three friends had been playing in the dry riverbed of the Rio Grande that separates the Mexican city of Ciudad Juarez from its Texan neighbor, El Paso.

The youths were racing up the concrete embankment to touch the barbed-wire fence on the U.S. side of the border, and racing back down, when Hernandez was shot in the head by Mesa.

Mesa later claimed Hernandez had refused to obey his order to stop the game and had thrown rocks at him. The teen's family say Hernandez posed no danger.

After the Justice Department ruled that Mesa had acted within his responsibilities, Hernandez's family sued the official for damages.

They argued that U.S. law protects people against disproportionate use of force by law enforcement, and that Mesa had violated Hernandez's rights under the U.S. constitution.

The federal district court in Texas rebuffed the lawsuit, and a regional appeals court supported that decision, on the grounds that the victim was a Mexican national and died on Mexican territory, and thus had no claim of protection under the U.S. constitution.

In 2017 the case went to the Supreme Court, which ordered the appeals court to rehear it considering certain legal precedents.

The appeals court again ruled the family had no basis to sue, and the family appealed to the high court once again.

This is not the only case of its kind. The Mexican government alleges that dozens of migrants or Mexican citizens have been killed by U.S. officials on the border in recent years.

A similar lawsuit over a Border Patrol agent's 2012 shooting of a 16 year old girl on the Mexican side of the border with Arizona was approved last year in a separate appeals court.

The government then appealed that case to the Supreme Court, where it will likely be on hold for a decision in the Hernandez case.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has called for border officials to take tougher action to deter immingrants and asylum-seekers.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # engelbach 2019-05-30 10:32
The reasoning behind these decisions is barbaric.

In effect, no one on foreign soil is protected from murder by someone standing on US soil.

I remind readers that the decision by the Justice Department that Hernandez's murder was justified was made on Obama's watch.