RSN Fundraising Banner
HUD Says 55,000 Children Could Be Pushed to Homelessness Under Trump Plan to Evict Undocumented Immigrants
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49860"><span class="small">Samantha Grasso, Splinter</span></a>   
Friday, 10 May 2019 13:03

Grasso writes: "Tens of thousands of children could be displaced and become at risk for homelessness under the Trump administration's latest effort to bar undocumented immigrants from using public benefits, according to an analysis from the Department of Housing and Urban Development."

Secretary of HUD Ben Carson. (photo: Getty)
Secretary of HUD Ben Carson. (photo: Getty)


HUD Says 55,000 Children Could Be Pushed to Homelessness Under Trump Plan to Evict Undocumented Immigrants

By Samantha Grasso, Splinter

10 May 19

 

ens of thousands of children could be displaced and become at risk for homelessness under the Trump administration’s latest effort to bar undocumented immigrants from using public benefits, according to an analysis from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

According to the Washington Post, under a new HUD rule published to the Federal Register on Friday blocking all undocumented people from using subsidized housing, more than 55,000 children—all of whom are legal residents or U.S. citizens—could be displaced as a result.

As the Post notes, undocumented immigrants are currently not allowed to receive federal housing subsidies. However, families of mixed-immigration status can receive assistance as long as one person is eligible, such as a child born in the U.S. or a spouse who is American. The subsidies are then prorated to only cover the eligible residents. But the new rule proposed by HUD would require all members of a household to meet those eligibility requirements to receive benefits.

The rule, which is open for public comment until June 9, would use the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program to verify a person’s immigration and citizenship status to check their eligibility for housing assistance. Under the new rule, the department would “make certain our scarce public resources help those who are legally entitled to it,” HUD Sec. Ben Carson said last month.

The department’s regulatory impact analysis found that an estimated 25,000 households in subsidized housing (with about 108,000 people) have at least one ineligible member. Of the mixed-status households who may be evicted under the new rule, 70 percent (or approximately 76,000 people) are legally eligible for benefits. Half of public housing residents who could potentially be evicted under the proposal are children who qualify for subsidies.

And while the Trump administration might try to disguise the policy, pushed by the president’s white nationalist senior adviser, Stephen Miller, as an effort to make public housing more available to households comprised entirely of U.S. citizens, HUD itself has said that no one may benefit from the eviction and subsequent homelessness of mixed-status families. From the Post, emphasis mine:

Those mixed-status families in subsidized housing receive an average of $8,400 per household a year, according to the HUD analysis, which is typically written by career staff.

Restricting those subsidies to families in which all members are legal U.S. residents would cost an additional $193 million to $227 million a year because entire families would receive higher subsidies, the analysis said.

Given that Congress is unlikely to allocate the additional money, HUD probably would be compelled to “reduce the quantity and quality of assisted housing in response to higher costs,” the analysis found.

As a result, the analysis said, “there could be fewer households served under the housing choice vouchers program” — contrary to the Trump administration’s stated goal of getting more families off the years-long waiting lists for housing assistance.

For public housing complexes, increased costs imposed by the rule would hurt the quality of service, maintenance of units and “possibly deterioration of the units that could lead to vacancy,” HUD said.

HUD’s analysis did propose grandfathering current mixed-status households under the proposal for a cheaper measure, but knowing Trump and Miller, destabilizing and terrorizing immigrant families will come at any cost.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
0 # Thinking 2019-05-11 09:45
Did I read this right?
It's better to have partially qualified families (with as few as one citizen)subsidi zed for housing, because the government-paid subsidy is less than for fully-qualified families (with all citizens), because there isn't enough money for all the qualified people?
So it has been considered better to subsidize households with unqualified people than with all qualified people.

Homelessness is exploding in my area. But this article explains it is better to partially subsidize households with some unqualified, non citizens and leave the all-citizen families on the streets (because they isn't enough money to help all of them).