RSN Fundraising Banner
Report: The World Blows Over $5 Trillion a Year on Oil and Gas Subsidies
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48151"><span class="small">Brian Kahn, Earther</span></a>   
Friday, 10 May 2019 13:03

Kahn writes: "The world subsidized its own demise to the tune of $5.2 trillion in 2017."

Oil refinery. (photo: AP)
Oil refinery. (photo: AP)


Report: The World Blows Over $5 Trillion a Year on Oil and Gas Subsidies

By Brian Kahn, Earther

10 May 19

 

he world subsidized its own demise to the tune of $5.2 trillion in 2017.

That’s how much 191 nations collectively spent directly and indirectly subsidizing fossil fuels, according to the hippies at the International Monetary Fund. The staggering number shows why failure to account for climate change, air pollution, and other societal ills when it comes to fossil fuel extraction is often described as the biggest market failure ever, and also that maybe the market isn’t going to save us.

Thinking about $5.2 trillion is hard. It’s equivalent to 6.5 percent of the entire world’s annual GDP. It’s more than France and Germany’s GDP combined. It’s $164,890.91 of money wasted per second in a year. But one thing is obvious: it is an absolutely stupid amount of money to be throwing away on something that is actively harmful to life on Earth.

IMF’s report released late last week breaks down where the huge figure comes from. On the one hand, you have you have your direct price subsidies that help offset costs consumers pay for, say gas or heating oil. Those totals are still profound at more than $300 billion in 2017, but the real subsidies are hidden in the impacts burning fossil fuels have on society. Burning oil, gas, and coal cause widespread health problems tied with air pollution and disrupt the climate, and fossil fuels aren’t paying their fair share.

In their calculations, IMF relies on a metric called the social cost of carbon to estimate these hidden subsidies. It uses a middle of the road estimate of $40 per ton of carbon, with a 3 percent rise annually. While there are lines of research showing a carbon tax of $40 per ton isn’t high enough, that’s how IMF arrives at its $5.2 trillion figure.

Using 2015 data, the report also breaks down subsidies by individual countries. The biggest subsidizer by far is China, which committed $1.4 trillion to subsidizing fossil fuels. The U.S. wasted $649 billion, the equivalent of using $2,028 per person to set the world on fire.

If fossil fuels were correctly priced in 2015, IMF’s research shows carbon emissions would have been 28 percent lower and 46 percent fewer people would’ve died from air pollution, which kills 4.2 million annually. Tax revenues would also have gone up 3.8 percent and the total economic benefits would have been equal to 1.7 percent of global GDP.

As things are currently structured, dirty fossil fuels like coal are an increasingly tenuous bet financially. But then they’ve also become indefensible scientifically as the world inches closer to catastrophic climate change. Despite this, the world continues to kowtow to entrenched interests. And the longer it does, the more this and future generations will suffer the consequences.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+4 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-05-11 07:16
Why do those who shriek & whinge so hysterically about ‘Socialism’ love it so much when corporations receive its benefits? & why should petroleum corporations receive subsidies when other resource industries don’t? Madness heaped upon greed & desolation.
 
 
+5 # WorkingClass 2019-05-11 07:56
Gee - spending our money to promote a program or behavior - isn't that one of those dreaded "socialistic" behaviors? I guess Adam's Smith's "Magic Hand" of the market has been giving us ordinary people the finger.