RSN Fundraising Banner
The 2020 Election's Approach Is No Reason to Avoid Impeachment
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15772"><span class="small">Dahlia Lithwick, Slate </span></a>   
Tuesday, 07 May 2019 13:08

Lithwick writes: "Americans seem to largely agree that President Donald Trump is a criminal. Recent polling supports that claim: 54 percent of American voters say Trump 'attempted to derail or obstruct the investigation into the Russian interference in the 2016 election.'"

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi answers questions during her weekly press conference at the Capitol on February 28. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi answers questions during her weekly press conference at the Capitol on February 28. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The 2020 Election's Approach Is No Reason to Avoid Impeachment

By Dahlia Lithwick, Slate

07 May 19

Democrats are repeating a mistake they should have learned in 2016.

mericans seem to largely agree that President Donald Trump is a criminal. Recent polling supports that claim: 54 percent of American voters say Trump “attempted to derail or obstruct the investigation into the Russian interference in the 2016 election,” while 72 percent say Robert Mueller conducted a fair investigation. Despite the president’s bluster about how the Russia hoax has “stollen” two years from his presidency, for which he thinks he ought to seek “reparations,” most Americans understand that the president threatened his staffers who sought to cooperate with the Mueller probe. They understand that he tasked others with limiting the scope of the probe and with firing Mueller, and that he instructed his legal counsel to falsify documents to clear him of obstruction. None of this is even disputed. The only question is whether he can be charged for it while he remains in office.

In an astounding letter released Monday, 400 former prosecutors contend that, were he not president, Trump would have been charged with obstruction. Virtually nobody other than Attorney General William Barr accepts Barr’s analysis that obstruction was never even on the table. Instead, the public is intuitively reaching a similar conclusion to Mueller’s: The president committed crimes, but as a sitting president, he cannot be indicted while in office. Which means that, again, the remaining question is what to do about the fact that the president committed crimes. (One can also ask why criminality is the only bar we have set for ourselves, but that’s perhaps beside the point.)

Donald Trump won’t accept a 2020 presidential election loss, whether it’s by a large margin or a small one, for the same reason he never accepted his 2016 popular vote loss—he doesn’t like it.

On Saturday, the New York Times published an article indicating that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi doesn’t want to seek impeachment because she’d rather focus on winning the 2020 elections by huge margins. Somehow, even as she conceded that “Trump would not give up power voluntarily if he lost re-election by a slim margin next year,” Pelosi placed her confidence in massive margins being the one thing the president would respect. On some level, Pelosi is correct to fear the spectacle of a protracted public impeachment battle, but the notion that Democrats should somehow circumvent a president who evinces no respect for the law by persuading him that this time he lost for realz strikes me as demented.

Donald Trump won’t accept a 2020 presidential election loss, whether it’s by a large margin or a small one, for the same reason he never accepted his 2016 popular vote loss—he doesn’t like it, and so he won’t let it be true. He will convince a third of the country that it wasn’t true, because he doesn’t like it. Indeed, that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 is, by means of his perfectly circular reasoning, the very reason he will not countenance the idea of Russian involvement in the theft of the 2016 election. It’s also the reason he created a fraudulent “voter fraud” commission. His psychological fragility on this matter has meant that he has done less than nothing to deter more meddling in the 2020 election. He wouldn’t even broach the topic with Russian President Vladimir Putin last week, because if you live in Donald Trump’s head, no election loss is legitimate. It’s funny to think that a “big” election loss would make the difference.

None of this is news to Nancy Pelosi, but unfortunately, putting one’s faith in the elections system makes even less sense today than it did in 2016. As Jamelle Bouie observes, we are now in the epicenter of an all-out vote suppression crisis that has become an all-out democracy crisis.

It’s easy to forget this, but it bears repeating: The reason former FBI Director James Comey didn’t take the Russian threat against the elections system seriously enough in 2016 is because he believed Hillary Clinton would win by large margins. The reason President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder and others who knew about the threats before we did failed to respond with utmost urgency and seriousness is because they too believed that Hillary Clinton would win. By large margins. Time and time again, people who had access to both information and power opted to take the less draconian path because they believed that there would still be a free and fair election and that Trump would not win it. We know how that turned out.

We make the same mistake of not acting on the ongoing threats to congressional oversight, to free and fair voting, and to foreign cyberattacks because an election might solve it at our peril. An election may well become the problem. Doing less than absolutely everything possible to reinstate the rule of law in America today in the hopes that there will be less election interference next time, or more benign election interference, or less purposive election interference, is insane.

This isn’t a joke. This is a full-fledged crisis of constitutional democracy and the checking function of Congress. It’s heartening to think that in a year and a half we can vote our way out of our predicament, but it’s a bit like suggesting that we have a good long national think about how things are currently going and tend to it all in 2020, when all the systems that were already broken in 2016 are more broken. If Democrats in the House seriously believe that the attorney general has covered up illegal activity and is refusing to accept congressional oversight, they should model seriousness. Which means that they should do something about it, beyond waiting for the problem to be voted away by large margins.

As Jennifer Rubin noted two weeks ago, Democrats have more than one possible response to Donald Trump’s illegal conduct at their disposal. There is no reason why they need to take any single one of them off the table, and there is certainly no reason why they should announce the plan to do so to the New York Times. Banking on an elections system that is being warped before our eyes is a recipe for disaster, and it’s a lesson that should have been learned by now.

The challenge Pelosi faces is the same challenge faced by Mueller, and by Eric Holder. Elections matter, and getting out the vote in 2020 matters. But the Rule of Law still matters, and we shouldn’t abandon it because this small problem of Donald Trump might go away in 2020. The fact is that this problem might not go away in 2020, though by then, the argument that obstruction itself is an impeachable offense will have been lost to us. That’s all the more reason to fight for the rule of law today, as if it were sliding away. Because it is sliding away. That isn’t something the country should wait to vote on. The country already knows it is true.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

-13 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-05-07 15:06
The opening of this article is idiotic. One can only be a criminal after having been convicted in a court. Simple allegations by a loser DOJ prosecutor or the mass media don't make anyone a criminal. Public polling doesn't mean anything. Most Americans believe any sort of nonsense they are fed by the mass media.

I also wonder how his author knows Trump won't accept a defeat in 2020. I think he will. He was prepared to accept a loss in 2016. It was Hillary and her supporters who have never accepted their loss in 2016.

This author does not seem to understand the risks and challenges of impeachment for democrats. It will bring to power in the party the wrong people. It will create a massive public issue that will drown out the true progressives that have the best chance of defeating Trump. Some impeachment wizard like Adam Schiff may think he can become president because he led the impeachment fight. The mass media will be all behind him since they hate Sanders. Schiff would lose in a landslide.

Impeachment would almost certainly lose in the senate and that would leave Trump stronger. But if it did work, we'd have Pence and he could probably unify republicans and beat any democrat. Then Pence would be entitled to two full terms of his own. So we'd get 12 years of Trump/Pence instead of just four.

Talk about cutting off your own nose just to spite your face. This author seems like a real pro in that tactic.
+1 # dbrize 2019-05-07 21:16
TDS Preamble:

“But I don’t want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.”Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat: “we’re all mad here. You’re mad.”

How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice.”You must be,” said the Cat, “or you wouldn’t have come here.”
-1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-05-08 13:18
Yes, this is the total truth. I'm listening now to the congressional judiciary committee debate whether or not to hold Barr in contempt of congress. Where is Alice when I need her so badly. They are all mad. The Mueller Report is the new "Americans in Wonderland."
+2 # johnescher 2019-05-08 05:34
You just want to be guilty of murder, Rodion Raskolnikov, It comes from your name. Do you and Nancy Pelosi really think you know better than Thomas Jefferson, who would want Donald Trump's impeached, I guarantee it.
0 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-05-08 13:21
j.e. -- I want Trump impeached too. But not for Russiagate or some non-entity like that. I want him impeached for being the lackey of two criminal dictators -- Netanyahoo and bin Salmon. Both are murderers and Trump is in collusion with them. I also want him impeached for trying to start a war against Iran and Venezuela. He has hired the criminals Bolton and Abrams to help him start wars. Impeach him for those crimes and I'm all on board. The Russia stuff is just BS.
0 # dbrize 2019-05-08 20:57
You are quite dogmatic johnescher. Caveat emptor.

“He who knows best knows how little he knows”.
Thomas Jefferson
-1 # laborequalswealth 2019-05-08 08:05
STOP!!!! JUST BLEEDIN' STOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How is it that these corporate Demos are so incredibly stupid that they can't even COUNT???????? Look at the Senate. There is ZERO ZERO ZERO way the Repub controlled Senate is going to impeach Trump. ZERO. ows.that. EVERYONE.

So why are these corporate shills wasting our time on this impeachment nonsense but do NOTHING about how Trump is destroying everything in his path like a two year old with a machine gun??????

If the Demos had put half as much effort into Medicare for All, we might have decent health care coverage in America by now. Instead, they had squandered every opportunity to do anything at all to help the American people through this nightmare.

The Demo's utterly corrupt leadership needs to just GO AWAY.

And Biden? Are you fucking kidding me.
0 # lfeuille 2019-05-08 18:32
But it will keep his quest for dictatorship front and center right up to the election and hopefully keep him to busy and distracted to start another war or drown Alaska and the Atlantic coast in oil, etc. etc. etc. And we do not know for sure that day after day of bad publicity won't change some Senators minds.