RSN Fundraising Banner
Florida Lawmakers Approve Rolling Back Voting Rights for People With Felony Convictions
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48301"><span class="small">Jessica M. Goldstein, ThinkProgress</span></a>   
Saturday, 04 May 2019 12:34

Goldstein writes: "It took 150 years for voters in Florida to do away with a lifetime voting ban on residents with a felony conviction. It took just six months for the state’s Republican-controlled legislature to effectively reinstate the prohibition against voting for most of its newly-enfranchised citizens."

A prisoner. (photo: Getty Images)
A prisoner. (photo: Getty Images)

Florida Lawmakers Approve Rolling Back Voting Rights for People With Felony Convictions

By Jessica M. Goldstein, ThinkProgress

04 May 19

A new measure requiring the payment of fees and and outstanding fines would prevent tens of thousands of people from voting.

t took 150 years for voters in Florida to do away with a lifetime voting ban on residents with a felony conviction. It took just six months for the state’s Republican-controlled legislature to effectively reinstate the prohibition against voting for most of its newly-enfranchised citizens.

Florida’s House late Friday, by a vote of 67-42, approved a measure denying the right to vote to people with felony convictions who still owe fees and fines outstanding to the court. The bill was approved in the Senate earlier in the week.

The bill, if signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis, (R-FL) will prevent tens of thousands of people from exercising the right to vote, seriously compromise the gains won by Amendment 4, which in November restored voting rights for up to 1.5 million people with felony convictions.

Republicans claim the restrictions are vital to “clarify” how Amendment 4 should be implemented. As the New York Times reported, DeSantis had previously “called on the legislature to set additional standards for registering ex-felons to vote.”

Amendment 4 passed last year with nearly 65% of the vote. It was a significant victory for civil rights in Florida which, like the rest of the nation, disproportionately imprisons black Americans.

Prior to Amendment 4, Florida was one of just three states with laws on the books that imposed a lifelong voting ban on individuals with felony convictions. Now, Iowa and Kentucky are the only two states with these bans.

Florida’s felony disenfranchisement laws are a holdover from the Jim Crow era. They were written into the state’s constitution by white lawmakers in 1868 to keep newly freed slaves from gaining political power.

The expansion of voting rights in Florida led to the largest number of people gaining ballot access in the United States to the ballot since the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Activists said that progress now appears to be on the verge of unraveling.

“We’re concerned that this could undermine the biggest expansion of voting rights in decades,” Corey Goldstone, media strategist for the Campaign Legal Center, told ThinkProgress.

Goldstone described one woman in Boynton Beach who, due to these restrictions, “is likely going to be ineligible to vote until 2031 because she owes fines and fees, and she makes minimum wage. She badly wants to vote, and is frustrated by how many hoops she has to jump through.”

The new requirements “will have a disparate impact on a group that is disproportionately minority and may lack employment or large incomes, because it ties the criminal justice system and voting rights system to your bank account,” Goldstone said.

Anyone not in a position to, say, just hand $5,000 over to the courts upon their release from prison, is effectively being denied their voting rights. “Your ability to vote is a sacred right and it shouldn’t be tied to your wealth,”

Before the passage of Amendment 4, Florida was home to the greatest number of people who were disenfranchised due to their criminal records. People in the state with felony convictions would face clemency hearings, a subjective process during which a formerly-incarcerated citizen would need to demonstrate sufficient contrition and moral repentance — and still in the vast majority of cases they were denied restoration of their voting rights.

Goldstone said it’s not just the formerly convicted, but society as a whole that benefits when more of its citizens vote. 

“It’s easier for somebody to reintegrate into society if they feel that they are a rightful citizen with all the same rights as their neighbors, and continuing to deny them the right to vote just creates distance between these people and their neighbors, and it makes it harder for them to rehabilitate,” he said.

“We know that felony disenfranchisement laws affect recidivism rates. If you are denied the right to vote after getting out, you’re more likely to reoffend.”

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+14 # BetaTheta 2019-05-04 18:26
Of course, these people are just pawns in the great Republican game of hanging on to power through voter suppression. The same voters who supported the initiative in the last election should have thrown out these sleazy pols while they were at it.
+2 # DongiC 2019-05-04 20:37
They didn't and the evil Republicans struck back with a new chapter in their book of voter suppression. When will the poorer classes ever be treated fairly in the state of Florida?
+2 # Jim Rocket 2019-05-04 22:50
Modern Republicans will do anything to avoid fair elections because they know they couldn't win one.
+3 # lfeuille 2019-05-05 14:44
Sounds like a covert poll tax to me. It should be challenged.
+3 # 2019-05-06 05:03
I think using names for parties will continue to support this expensive, vicious, and antagonistic system, even if we could have a greater number of strong parties. It will always devolve to a war of two. As an option, with numbers as a gauge of the positions, instead of parties (a system of points with the sum total reflecting numerous positions of the candidate, on a scale), the total also reflects the candidate most in-line with one's views. So, the candidates use their personal name, and are only representing themselves, not a party. One is voted on strictly on their views, without all the other machinations and huge costs associated with this current political circus. Also, no lobbyists, with caps on expenses (with subsidies to the max) so that even a poor person could run if s/he had enough names on petitions, for example.

More imminently important to Our Republic is to protest the medical-militar y industrial h_ll (see info & pics on my site ourconstitution .info) if anyone wants to join me in Miami, or send pics from wherever you are & I'll post ... We do have " a lot of killers" ...Reign in the Intel Apparatus – heed Eisenhower’s warning! ...CIA OUT of our schools ...We have begun that steep and treacherous descent -- it is up to US, the PEOPLE ...If Congressional Intel overseers were doing their job, we wouldn't be in this position...We are losing Our Republic and Constitution ... protest wherever you are!