RSN Fundraising Banner
Trump Administration to Ease Safety Rules Created After Deadly Deepwater Horizon Explosion
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50705"><span class="small">Janet McConnaughey and Ellen Knickmeyer, Associated Press</span></a>   
Friday, 03 May 2019 08:17

Excerpt: "The Trump administration on Thursday moved to ease safety regulations adopted after the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon blowout, the worst offshore oil disaster in U.S. history that killed nearly a dozen people."

Deepwater Horizon Oil platform on fire. (photo: US Coastguard)
Deepwater Horizon Oil platform on fire. (photo: US Coastguard)


Trump Administration to Ease Safety Rules Created After Deadly Deepwater Horizon Explosion

By Janet McConnaughey and Ellen Knickmeyer, Associated Press

03 May 19

 

he Trump administration on Thursday moved to ease safety regulations adopted after the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon blowout, the worst offshore oil disaster in U.S. history that killed nearly a dozen people.

Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said in a statement the administration was acting to eliminate “unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining safety and environmental protection offshore.” The oil industry has been challenging the Obama-era rules, which govern the operation of offshore wells.

Officials announced the final revisions at Louisiana’s Port Fourchon, a hub of offshore drilling on the Gulf of Mexico. The audience included oil port workers in hard hats and reflective safety vests.

Eleven people died in April 2010 when the Deepwater Horizon exploded, ultimately releasing more than 3 million barrels of crude.

A bipartisan investigatory commission appointed by the Obama administration pointed to crew and technical failures in the explosion, but cited overall safety shortcomings by regulators and the oil industry. “The most significant failure … and the clear root cause of the blowout — was a failure of industry management,” the investigation panel concluded.

Rules adopted after the disaster included more precise operating requirements for offshore crews in tracking pressure in underwater wells, more real-time monitoring by oil companies, and more rigorous inspections of blowout preventers on the offshore facilities.

The Trump administration and oil industry say the revised rule amounts to small changes, preserving 80 percent of the post-disaster rule changes.

Erik Milito, a vice president of the American Petroleum Institute, which pushed for the Trump administration revisions, said the slate of safety changes adopted under the Obama administration was “simply too prescriptive, curtails innovation and can make it hard for the company to move forward.”

“We haven’t identified anything in the rule that’s taking a step backward on safety,” Milito said, referring to the Trump administration revisions.

The easing of some of the Obama-era safety measures come as the Trump administration pushes to greatly expand drilling off the country’s coasts, although court challenges and opposition from many coastal states has slowed the effort.

Environmental groups fiercely oppose the rule changes, which become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Don Boesch, a marine scientist on the presidential commission into the disaster, said even with the new changes, “we’re still better off probably than we were before the blowout” in terms of offshore drilling safety.

“But I’m not convinced we’re safer than we were two years ago,” Boesch said.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
0 # dotlady 2019-05-03 11:21
What exactly are the "small changes" that were made in the regulations? How can we evaluate the effect if it's not clear what has been cut out.
 
 
0 # dotlady 2019-05-03 11:24
What are the "small we judge the possible the effect on safety if we don't know what they are?
 
 
0 # draypoker 2019-05-05 08:28
The remaining sources of oil are likely to become harder to extract so that incidents of this type risk becoming more likely. That is a sign that phasing out energy from oil is the right plan, quite apart from the serious danger to the planet from the CO2 emitted by burning oil.