RSN Fundraising Banner
College Democrats at Over 40 Schools Boycott DCCC Over Pro-Incumbent Policy
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50671"><span class="small">Zack Budryk, The Hill</span></a>   
Sunday, 28 April 2019 08:27

Budryk writes: "Young Democrats at more than 30 colleges nationwide plan to boycott the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) in protest of a new policy critics say is intended to freeze out challengers to incumbent representatives."

Ayanna Pressley points to her supporters after winning the Democratic primary in Boston, September 4, 2018. (photo: Brian Snyder/Reuters)
Ayanna Pressley points to her supporters after winning the Democratic primary in Boston, September 4, 2018. (photo: Brian Snyder/Reuters)


College Democrats at Over 40 Schools Boycott DCCC Over Pro-Incumbent Policy

By Zack Budryk, The Hill

28 April 19

 

oung Democrats at more than 30 colleges nationwide plan to boycott the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) in protest of a new policy critics say is intended to freeze out challengers to incumbent representatives.

The policy, launched in late March, would require consultants and strategists to pledge not to work for candidates challenging a sitting Democratic member of Congress or be left off a list of vendors approved to work with the DCCC.

The Harvard College Democrats are leading the coalition, which initially featured 26 chapters nationwide but which Harvard Democrats President Hank Sparks confirmed to The Hill currently stands at 42. Participants include groups based at Arizona State University, Dartmouth College, Michigan State University, Rutgers University-Newark, University of Virginia and Spelman College.

“Primary challengers are essential to ensure that the Democratic Party is continually held accountable to the needs of our constituents. This blacklist policy is undemocratic and antithetical to our values of inclusion and diversity,” the Harvard Democrats said in a letter Wednesday. “Challengers to incumbents have been essential to making the Democratic Party an institution that truly reflects the progressive values and diverse identities of the people it claims to represent.”

When reached for comment, a spokesman for the DCCC told The Hill in a statement that the group is “proud of its historic work, flipping 43 formerly Republican seats and electing the most diverse caucus in American history."

"And as Democrats in the House combat Republicans’ attacks on Americans’ health care, take on special interests in Washington, and fight for an economy that works for everyday Americans, we are already well into our work to fortify this newly won House Majority and take the fight even deeper into ruby-red districts come 2020,” spokesman Cole Leiter said.

Leiter also told The Hill characterizations of the DCCC as seeking to stymie progressive candidates were inaccurate, saying that in the 2018 midterms, the DCCC spent a total of nearly $26 million to elect candidates who would later join the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

The DCCC policy opposed by College Democrats chapters has drawn the ire of the party’s progressive flank in Congress. Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), both of whom were elected in 2018 after defeating longtime incumbents in their respective primaries, have spoken out against it.

The coalition’s letter cites Pressley’s comments that Democrats “cannot credibly lay claim to prioritizing diversity & inclusion when institutions like the DCCC implement policies that threaten to silence new voices and historically marginalized communities.”

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), one of President Trump’s most vocal supporters in Congress, echoed their critique, tweeting, “General elections determine whether your party gets power. Primaries determine what you’ll use it for.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+9 # tedcloak 2019-04-28 10:59
"Leiter also told The Hill characterizatio ns of the DCCC as seeking to stymie progressive candidates were inaccurate, saying that in the 2018 midterms, the DCCC spent a total of nearly $26 million to elect candidates who would later join the Congressional Progressive Caucus." Apparently he forgot to add, "and we want to make damn sure that doesn't happen again".
I support the PCCC, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.
 
 
0 # lfeuille 2019-04-28 22:17
Membership in the Progressive Caucus doesn't necessarily mean one is a progressive. Pelosi is a member.