RSN Fundraising Banner
Court Affirms Yellowstone More Valuable Than Gold, Blocks Mining Exploration
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=26011"><span class="small">Earthjustice</span></a>   
Wednesday, 17 April 2019 13:10

Excerpt: "A Montana district court has quashed a permit that would have allowed Canadian mining company Lucky Minerals Inc. to explore for gold in Emigrant Gulch just north of Yellowstone National Park."

North entrance of Yellowstone National Park. (photo: National Park Service)
North entrance of Yellowstone National Park. (photo: National Park Service)


ALSO SEE: Gold Mining Firm Hires Former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke

Court Affirms Yellowstone More Valuable Than Gold, Blocks Mining Exploration

By Earthjustice

17 April 19


Victory: Lucky Minerals’ exploration license ruled invalid, taking plans for exploratory drilling “off the table”

Montana district court has quashed a permit that would have allowed Canadian mining company Lucky Minerals Inc. to explore for gold in Emigrant Gulch just north of Yellowstone National Park. The ruling blocks exploratory drilling that was slated to begin on July 15, 2019, and is a significant victory in the multi-year effort to protect Yellowstone National Park from new mines surrounding the national park.

The ruling invalidates Lucky Minerals’ exploration license, establishing that it would violate the public’s environmental and public participation rights under Montana’s Constitution to allow the illegal project to move forward. The ruling is the result of a lawsuit brought by Park County Environmental Council and the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, both represented by Earthjustice.

“This ruling ensures that Lucky Minerals can’t harm clean water and native wildlife at the gateway into Yellowstone National Park under cover of a license that was never legally issued in the first place,” said Jenny Harbine, Earthjustice attorney. “Lucky Minerals should have read the writing on the wall a long time ago.”

The same court previously ruled that the Montana Department of Environmental Quality illegally approved the drilling plan when it failed to consider the plan’s threats to water quality and wildlife. Despite these findings, Lucky Minerals was still permitted to conduct the exploratory drilling that would give rise to these threats before the agency could conduct a new review of the project. As the court explained, this left the public with “no meaningful chance to participate in the agency decision” before the harmful impacts of drilling could occur.

While Lucky Minerals was promoting its gold exploration plans for mining claims around Yellowstone, federal agencies and Congressional leaders went to work to protect the lands surrounding the national park. Then-Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke made adjacent public lands around Yellowstone off limits to mining with a 20-year mineral withdrawal on October 8, 2018. And on March 12, 2019, the President signed into law a bipartisan public lands bill making these protections permanent.

“Lucky Minerals should have learned by now that our community will not rest until our irreplaceable wild places are safe from industrial gold mining,” said Park County Environmental Council Executive Director Michelle Uberuaga. “We will win because local residents, businesses, and elected officials are united to protect our natural resources and local economy against this threat.”

“The court’s ruling is a critical piece in protecting Yellowstone’s Gateway from the menace of gold mining,” said Greater Yellowstone Coalition Executive Director Caroline Byrd. “The Trump administration, the Obama administration, Congress, the Forest Service, the Park County Commission, thousands of citizens and more than 420 Montana businesses all agree, Yellowstone is more valuable than gold.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 14:23
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+4 # bardphile 2019-04-17 22:30
Great news. What's with these Canadian mining companies, anyway. Seems like they're all over the western USA.
 
 
+1 # elizabethblock 2019-04-22 20:59
Yup, they are. They're all over the world, especially the third world. They are doing a lot of harm.
Some years ago there was a bill introduced into Parliament, a very modest bill, to hold mining (and other) companies operating abroad to the same environmental and social standards they are held to at home. It would have passed - we had a minority government - if the Liberals had voted for it. (It was a private member's bill brought by a Liberal, John MacKay.)
But the Liberal leader, Michael Ignatieff, led a walkout of Liberal MPs. And he's regarded as a good guy! I don't think so. He's back at Harvard now, I believe, where he can do less harm than he did in Ottawa.
 
 
+4 # tedrey 2019-04-18 07:47
I wish we could see this as a trend.