RSN Fundraising Banner
Trump's Apparent Sympathy for Assassination
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=25952"><span class="small">Aaron Blake, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Tuesday, 16 April 2019 12:53

Blake writes: "The New York Times is out with a lengthy look at CIA Director Gina Haspel and her relationship with a president who is often skeptical of his own intelligence community."

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un inspects the construction site of the Wonsan-Kalma coastal tourist area. (photo: KCNA/Reuters)
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un inspects the construction site of the Wonsan-Kalma coastal tourist area. (photo: KCNA/Reuters)


Trump's Apparent Sympathy for Assassination

By Aaron Blake, The Washington Post

16 April 19


A report suggests Trump initially viewed the poisoning of former Russian agent Sergei Skripal on British soil as fair game for Vladimir Putin. It fits a trend.

he New York Times is out with a lengthy look at CIA Director Gina Haspel and her relationship with a president who is often skeptical of his own intelligence community.

One detail in paragraph 15 stands out:

Last March, top national security officials gathered inside the White House to discuss with Mr. Trump how to respond to the nerve agent attack in Britain on Sergei V. Skripal, the former Russian intelligence agent.

London was pushing for the White House to expel dozens of suspected Russian operatives, but Mr. Trump was skeptical. He had initially written off the poisoning as part of legitimate spy games, distasteful but within the bounds of espionage. Some officials said they thought that Mr. Trump, who has frequently criticized “rats” and other turncoats, had some sympathy for the Russian government’s going after someone viewed as a traitor.

The story goes on to say Haspel was able to prevail upon President Trump to offer a tough response, after showing him images of children who had come into contact with the same nerve agent. But Trump’s apparent first impulse here is extremely noteworthy, and very much in keeping with his other commentary on stuff like this.

Put plainly: Trump’s default mode seems to border on indifference toward strongmen and their political assassinations.

The most famous/infamous example of this came shortly after Trump was inaugurated, when Bill O’Reilly interviewed him ahead of the Super Bowl. O’Reilly asked Trump about his kind words for Russian President Vladimir Putin on the 2016 campaign trail and noted that Putin was a “killer.” But Trump suggested what Putin was doing was little different than what the United States does.

"There are a lot of killers. We have a lot of killers,” Trump said. “Well, you think our country is so innocent?”

When asked in 2016 about another poisoning of an ex-KGB agent for which British authorities had just fingered Putin, then-candidate Trump suggested he wasn’t sure that conclusion was right. “Have they found him guilty? I don’t think they’ve found him guilty,” Trump said of the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko. He added: “If he did it, fine. But I don’t know that he did it.”

When “60 Minutes” in October 2018 asked Trump about Putin’s alleged killings and poisonings of political foes, he said Putin had “probably” engaged in such things, but he also emphasized that “it’s not in our country.”

Trump offered similar comments downplaying the U.S. interest in the Saudis’ killing of Washington Post contributing columnist Jamal Khashoggi last year. Trump conspicuously noted at the time that the attack “took place in Turkey, and to the best of our knowledge, Khashoggi is not a United States citizen.”

When it comes to Kim Jong Un, Trump’s commentary has occasionally boiled over into what appears to be admiration for the North Korean dictator’s ability to command power by whatever means necessary. When Fox News’s Bret Baier in June 2018 borrowed O’Reilly’s tack and noted to Trump that Kim is a “killer” who is “clearly executing people,” Trump quickly turned it around. He argued that Kim was a “tough guy” and praised him.

BAIER: You call people sometimes “killers.” He — you know, he is a killer. I mean, he’s clearly executing people. And —

TRUMP: He’s a tough guy. Hey, when you take over a country, tough country, with tough people, and you take it over from your father, I don’t care who you are, what you are, how much of an advantage you have, if you can do that at 27 years old, you — I mean that’s one in 10,000 that could do that, so he’s a very smart guy. He’s a great negotiator. But I think we understand each other.

When Baier pressed Trump, Trump returned to an answer reminiscent of the O’Reilly interview: “So have a lot of other people done some really bad things. I mean, I could go through a lot of nations where a lot of bad things were done.”

In another interview, Trump even praised Kim’s triumph over his uncle, whom Kim ultimately executed. Kim has also been accused of ordering the assassination of his half brother in a Malaysian airport using a nerve agent.

“A lot of people, I’m sure, tried to take that power away, whether it was his uncle or anybody else,” Trump told CBS’s “Face the Nation” in April 2017. “And he was able to do it. So obviously, he’s a pretty smart cookie.”

Any of these comments could be dismissed as Trump not wanting to prejudge, as him wanting to forge relationships with complicated people in difficult regions or even as Trump simply being “America first.” But the combined picture is one of a president whose tendency is to shrug at assassinations by strongmen.

While the United States certainly can’t police every human rights abuse across the world, these examples involve attacks that took place on allied soil, that involved a journalist for an American newspaper, that used nerve agents and that allowed dictators to continue to wield power in ways that could threaten the U.S. Given all of that, the idea that Trump’s first impulse was to dismiss the attempted assassination of a former Russian agent on British soil is unsurprising — but also completely noteworthy.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # Citizen Mike 2019-04-17 07:50
Trump has basically a gangster mentality and wishes he could assassinate his enemies. He is obviously delighted by the Saudi murder of Kashoggi, who repeatedly criticized and ridiculed Trump in the press. It is obvious that he longs to become America's dictator and scrap all pretense of democracy or separation of powers, to rule the nation as a CEO rules a corporation. The Republicans wanted a man who would run the nation "like a business" and that is exactly what they got.
 
 
+5 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-04-17 08:52
Barbarian president. When will the USA wake up & clean house: the White House, in particular?
 
 
0 # ourconstitution.info 2019-04-17 20:15
Most concerning is that WE HAVE “A LOT OF KILLERS". For whatever reason, Trump is not strongly condemning extrajudicial killings elsewhere. We demand however, that these murders on US soil are stopped; lethal chemicals and biologics secured (not sufficient currently); checks, balances, and monitoring of those with these skill-sets; for hospitals, cameras in rooms as an option; ability to monitor real-time chemical/biolog ic ingestion/injec tion; and due process implemented against all perpetrators. This is not new, I feel sure Obama was aware, and Trump was likely informed early on, prior to his 2017 interview with Bill O'Reilly. See my Home and Links pages for this interview link/more info. I applaud Trump for his candidness, intentional or not. I also have these concerns as a threatened, fired whistleblower at a powerful university that also happens to be a long-time, large CIA hub. The CIA should be OUT of our universities and medical campuses. We do need to monitor for foreign agents there, however, this should be with a new entity, and one solely dedicated to that mission. It should scare everyone that our Intel agencies, including the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc. have been able to morph insidiously for decades, despite Eisenhower's warning. Demand review and reform of these orgs and, should they continue to exist, demand valid, reliable, and verifiable oversight. Join me in protest in Miami, help me legally, email at my site… Protest wherever you are, before it might be too late.