RSN Fundraising Banner
Report: IRS More Likely to Audit Those Living in Poor, Mostly Black Counties
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50520"><span class="small">Brentin Mock, CityLab</span></a>   
Friday, 05 April 2019 08:31

Mock writes: "The racially discriminatory IRS audits revealed in a new report are yet another way of depleting and plundering the wealth of southern black families."

Internal Revenue Service. (photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty)
Internal Revenue Service. (photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty)


Report: IRS More Likely to Audit Those Living in Poor, Mostly Black Counties

By Brentin Mock, CityLab

05 April 19


The racially discriminatory IRS audits revealed in a new report are yet another way of depleting and plundering the wealth of southern black families.

n Baker County, Georgia, a small county in the southern Black Belt, there were 9.2 people audited by the IRS for every 1,000 tax filings between 2012 and 2015—a pretty high rate considering there are roughly only about 3,200 people in the county.

The national audit rate for that time period is 7.7 audits per 1,000 filings. Baker County’s audit rate is well above the 6.4 per 1000 in Washington County, Wisconsin, or the 6.6 audit rate in Sherburne County, Minnesota. The differences between these counties are quite stark: Washington and Sherburne counties have median household incomes of $73,021 and $83,895 respectively compared to Baker’s $43,867. And while roughly half of Baker County’s population is African American, Washington and Sherburne counties both have white populations in the 95 percent range.

These profiles are pretty typical of who does and doesn’t get audited, according to a report on regional IRS audit bias from former IRS economist Kim M. Bloomquist. ProPublica used data from Bloomquist’s report to create a map of where audits are most heavily concentrated, and shockingly the heaviest trail is found across the Black Belt South, from Mississippi to Georgia.

The Black Belt is populated mainly by black farmers, many of whom are living below federal poverty lines. In Baker County, Georgia, 24.6 percent of people are living in poverty, according to U.S. Census figures. This means that many of Baker County’s workers are eligible for the Earned Income Tax Credit, which helps low-income filers, but it’s the EITC that’s been snagging poorer filers in the IRS’s audit dragnet.

According to Bloomquist, there has been a “realignment of IRS resources from high-income taxpayers to low- and middle-income EITC claimants” since 2010 in terms of tax filing scrutiny, and one that “favors auditing EITC taxpayers at higher rates relative to other taxpayers”—this is happening despite the shrinking of the IRS’s staff and resources.

As ProPublica reported in December:

In 2017, EITC recipients were audited at twice the rate of taxpayers with income between $200,000 and $500,000. … As the IRS has dwindled in size and capability, audits of the poor have accounted for more of what it does. Last year, the IRS audited 381,000 recipients of the EITC. That was 36 percent of all audits the IRS conducted, up from 33 percent in 2011, when the budget cuts began.

The 10 counties with the highest IRS audit intensity are all found in the Black Belt, eight of them in Mississippi alone. Baker County’s 9.2 audit rate pales in comparison to Humphrey County, Mississippi, where the rate is about 11.8 audits per 1,000 filings. The Northeast region of the U.S. meanwhile appears to be largely protected from the IRS’s fine-tooth combs, despite the larger volume of wealthy households in that area.

Baker County, Georgia, is worth noting because that is the home of Shirley Sherrod, the African-American woman who was unceremoniously fired from her job at the USDA in 2010 after a video of a speech she gave was selectively edited to make it sound like she was using her post to discriminate against white farmers. It’s worth revisiting that speech in full, as her ordeal helped focus a spotlight on the plight of southern African Americans who’ve had their farms, land, and properties taken from them for decades.

The Federation of Southern Cooperatives Land Assistance Fund provides a chronology of this loss, showing that in 1910, there were an estimated 218,000 black farmers who were full- or part-owners of over 15 million acres of land. By 1992, there were fewer than 18,000 black farmers, owning 2.3 million acres of land. Much of that was due to the exploitation of black families who acquired land passed down to them from heirs and family members often without the strong documentation to protect their ownership.

But it’s also owed to decades of discrimination from the USDA who rejected black farmers for loans and grants to help maintain their properties. The Pigford vs Glickman class action lawsuit to have the federal government compensate black farmers for this discrimination just reached some semblance of resolution in 2013 following a protracted court fight that began in the late 1990s. And yet evidence continues to surface that black farmers are still being treated unfairly, losing their farms, and getting finessed out of their assets and resources (Word to Queen Sugar).

Many of those victimized farmers live in the counties that have been disproportionately scrutinized by the IRS. The racially and regionally discriminatory audits are yet another layer of financial burdening added to the long-running narrative of wealth depletion and plundering of black families throughout the South. That this escalation of Black Belt auditing came just as the Pigford lawsuit settlement dollars finally began reaching black farmers’ banks is suspicious, to say the least.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
0 # Robbee 2019-04-05 14:30
Report: IRS More Likely to Audit Those Living in Poor, Mostly Black Counties
Brentin Mock, CityLab
05 April 19

i have no problem with irs auditing anybody - my only problem is when irs selectively fails to audit similar others

about a dozen years ago divorce court forced me to borrow six figures for attorney fees, both sides, and other court expenses, like appraisals - the irs audited me; i expect because they suspected i was earning money? not borrowing?

i am robbee; bank records absolve me; i am broke; by judgment the judge robbed me

again, i have no problem with irs auditing anybody - my only problem is with irs NOT auditing somebody else

i have no problem with irs auditing "Those Living in Poor, Mostly Black Counties" - my only problem is with irs NOT auditing, in proportional numbers "Those NOT Living in Poor, Mostly Black Counties"

to fail to audit, in proportional numbers, "Those NOT Living in Poor, Mostly Black Counties" - is practically racist and elitist!

in behalf of wealthy donors, repukes keep cutting the irs budget, impairing their ability to audit wealthy folks

statistically the irs hurts tax collections, by relatively free-passing taxpayers who are not black and not poor!

only if the irs proportionally audits, for example, wealthy white farmers, is the irs fairly justified to audit poor, black farmers

when the irs, as here, fails to proportionally enforce tax law, they deny a protected class, blacks, equal protection of law!