RSN Fundraising Banner
Massive Lawsuit Says Sackler Family Broke Laws to Profit From Opioids
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50424"><span class="small">Ed Cara, Gizmodo</span></a>   
Saturday, 23 March 2019 08:28

Cara writes: "An enormous federal lawsuit out of New York is the latest and most brazen attempt to explicitly tie the billionaire Sackler family, owners of Purdue Pharma, to the opioid crisis."

OxyContin was originally widely marketed as a safe wonder drug because of the unique slow-release mechanism of its active ingredient, the narcotic oxycodone. (photo: Kevin D. Liles/NYT)
OxyContin was originally widely marketed as a safe wonder drug because of the unique slow-release mechanism of its active ingredient, the narcotic oxycodone. (photo: Kevin D. Liles/NYT)


Massive Lawsuit Says Sackler Family Broke Laws to Profit From Opioids

By Ed Cara, Gizmodo

23 March 19

 

n enormous federal lawsuit out of New York is the latest and most brazen attempt to explicitly tie the billionaire Sackler family, owners of Purdue Pharma, to the opioid crisis. It accuses them of knowingly misleading the public about the addictiveness of their drugs, as well as turning a blind eye to doctors who were accused of prescribing dangerously high doses or diverting their supply to the black market.

This week, a coalition of over 500 cities, counties, and Native American tribes sued eight members of the Sackler family in the southern district of New York, the Guardian reported.

Purdue and its executives have long faced accusations over their handling and marketing of OxyContin, their once-blockbuster painkiller. In 2007, the company agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges of misbranding OxyContin and paid a $600 million fine. However, state and local lawsuits have continued to accuse the company of doing little to change since that time.

These ongoing legal troubles and financial struggles have reportedly led Purdue to consider filing for bankruptcy, a move that might allow the company to stay afloat and possibly limit the amount of money plaintiffs from these cases might eventually be entitled to from a settlement or court victory. But what makes the current lawsuit in New York (which is separate from another lawsuit filed by the New York attorney general last fall) so notable is that it really doesn’t go after Purdue at all, but rather individual members of the Sackler family.

According to the Guardian, the lawsuit names Richard Sackler, Jonathan Sackler—sons of the late Raymond Sackler, one of the founders of Purdue—as well as Beverly Sackler, Raymond’s widow, and David Sackler, Raymond’s grandson. Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer David Alfons Sackler, children of another founding member, Mortimer Sackler, are also named, as is Theresa Sackler, the widow of Mortimer Sr.

“Eight people in a single family made the choices that caused much of the opioid epidemic,” stated the lawsuit, according to the Guardian. It’s estimated that over 60,000 people died from opioid overdose in 2017 alone, with more than 17,000 deaths involving prescription opioids.

These same people were named as co-defendants in an ongoing lawsuit by the Massachusetts Attorney General, and some of the same allegations—most notably about former Purdue chairman and president Richard Sackler’s aggressive push to drive up OxyContin sales—have been made public from unsealed court documents in other litigation. But the Massachusetts lawsuit still names Purdue, while other cases have gone after more than one opioid maker. The New York case, by comparison, only names a family trust of Raymond Sackler’s and Rhodes Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Purdue that makes generic opioid medications, in addition to the Sackers.

In response to the newest lawsuit, Purdue offered the same defense it’s put out before, telling Bloomberg News in a statement that the “complaint is part of a continuing effort by contingency-fee counsel to single out Purdue, blame it for the entire opioid crisis in the United States, and try the case in the court of public opinion rather than the justice system.”

It is true that public opinion has dramatically shifted against the Sacklers, who were once much better known for their philanthropy to the arts and museums. More recently, organizations such as the National Portrait Gallery and The Tate Galleries in the UK have announced they will no longer accept donations from the Sacklers, while the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced in January it would reevaluate its donation policy, following a long history of taking Sackler money and even naming one of its wings after the family.

Plaintiffs in the New York lawsuit include authorities from cities and counties in more than a dozen states, including Alabama, California and Florida, as well as eight Native American tribes.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
0 # AldoJay69 2019-03-23 19:22
I hope the progress of these cases will be followed in this space...