RSN Fundraising Banner
US Accused of Blocking Ambitious Global Action Against Plastic Pollution
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15867"><span class="small">Sandra Laville, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Saturday, 16 March 2019 12:38

Laville writes: "Environmental groups involved in talks at a United Nations conference in Kenya have accused the US of blocking an ambitious global response to plastic pollution."

People sort through waste at a collection center in Nairobi, where the United Nations environment assembly was held this week. (photo: Daniel Irungu/EPA)
People sort through waste at a collection center in Nairobi, where the United Nations environment assembly was held this week. (photo: Daniel Irungu/EPA)


US Accused of Blocking Ambitious Global Action Against Plastic Pollution

By Sandra Laville, Guardian UK

16 March 19


Commitments agreed at UN conference in Kenya do not go far enough, say green groups

nvironmental groups involved in talks at a United Nations conference in Kenya have accused the US of blocking an ambitious global response to plastic pollution.

Representatives of countries at the UN environment conference in Nairobi this week agreed to significantly reduce single-use plastics over the next decade but the voluntary pledges fell far short of what was required, according to green groups.

Norway, Japan and Sri Lanka had put forward proposals for a legally binding agreement for nations to coordinate action against plastic litter in the oceans and microplastics. India also suggested strong action with a resolution to phase out single-use plastic across the world.

But a coalition of environmental groups at the conference condemned the US for blocking the ambitious attempts to tackle plastic pollution at source as well as downstream.

An initial ministerial statement at the beginning of the event had proposed a commitment to “phase out single-use plastics ... by 2025”, a far stronger promise than the compromise nations reached.

On Friday, a series of non-binding proposals were agreed, including the adoption of an action plan by the International Maritime Organization’s marine environment protection committee to reduce plastic litter from ships, and suggestions for better global management of data on plastic pollution. A final statement said countries would “address the damage to our ecosystems caused by the unsustainable use and disposal of plastic products, including by significantly reducing single-use plastic by 2030”.

In response, environmental groups including Break Free From Plastic, IPEN, Plastic Change, No Waste Louisiana and Coare said the proposals did not go far enough.

“Despite sweeping agreement by the majority of countries that urgent, ambitious and global action is needed to address plastic across its lifecycle, from production to use to disposal, a small minority led by the United States blocked ambitious text and delayed negotiations,” they said in a statement.

Countries most affected by plastic pollution including the Philippines, Malaysia and Senegal were against the resolution being watered down.

Large oil firms in the US are investing billions of dollars in petrochemical production over the next decade, particularly shale gas.

The new facilities, which are being built by ExxonMobile Chemical and Shell Chemical, among others, will help fuel a 40% rise in plastic production in the next decade, according to industry experts.

The world already produces more than 300m tonnes of plastic a year.

“It’s hard to find one solution for all member states,” Siim Kiisler, the president of the UN environment assembly, told Agence France-Presse before the final decision. “The environment is at a turning point. We don’t need verbose documents, we need concrete commitments.”

When asked whether the US had pushed to have the commitments watered down during the week’s negotiations, Kiisler said: “I will not answer that question.”

David Azoulay, from the Center for International Environmental Law, condemned the weakening of the commitment.

He said: “The vast majority of countries came together to develop a vision for the future of global plastic governance. Seeing the US, guided by the interests of the fracking and petrochemical industry, leading efforts to sabotage that vision is disheartening.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+5 # USADUDE 2019-03-17 03:23
We are so myopic and stupid.
 
 
-3 # Robbee 2019-03-17 13:01
Quoting USADUDE 2019-03-17 03:23:
We are so myopic and stupid.

- ONCE MORE? REMIND ME WHY WE VOTED AGAINST HILLARY?
 
 
+6 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-03-17 05:02
US dragging its feet: Oil is still more important than Life.
 
 
+1 # Wise woman 2019-03-17 14:56
Boycott Exxon-Mobil and Shell oil. I have for years. If they only understand money, tell them you do too. It's that simple!
 
 
0 # economagic 2019-03-17 20:40
Unfortunately EVERY major fossil fool company has the morals of Jack the Ripper. But I still boycott the ones that make headlines on any given day. Around here I can still get Citgo, SOME profits from which MAY still be going to the Venezuelan people.