RSN Fundraising Banner
Senate Rebukes Trump With Vote Ordering US Military to End Support for Saudi-Led War in Yemen
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=31831"><span class="small">Karoun Demirjian, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Thursday, 14 March 2019 08:54

Demirjian writes: "The Senate voted Wednesday to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led military campaign in Yemen, its latest rebuke of the Trump administration's continued embrace of the Saudi monarchy despite growing frustration among lawmakers with its actions on the world stage."

Houthi fighter near a building bombed by Saudi-led coalition. (photo: AFP)
Houthi fighter near a building bombed by Saudi-led coalition. (photo: AFP)


Senate Rebukes Trump With Vote Ordering US Military to End Support for Saudi-Led War in Yemen

By Karoun Demirjian, The Washington Post

14 March 19

 

he Senate voted Wednesday to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led military campaign in Yemen, its latest rebuke of the Trump administration’s continued embrace of the Saudi monarchy despite growing frustration among lawmakers with its actions on the world stage.

The 54-to-46 vote marks the second time in recent months that the Senate has rejected the United States’ continued participation in Saudi Arabia’s bombing campaign against Yemen’s Houthi rebels, waged in the name of holding back Iran’s expansion in the region. But the Saudi-led effort, which has at times targeted civilian facilities and prevented aid shipments from getting to Yemenis, has been faulted by human rights organizations for exacerbating what the United Nations has deemed the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophe.

“We should not be associated with a bombing campaign that the U.N. tells us is likely a gross violation of human rights,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said on the Senate floor Wednesday.

The resolution must still be taken up in the House, where members passed a nearly identical resolution to end U.S. participation in the Yemen war earlier this year.

It is unlikely, however, that either chamber would have the votes necessary to resuscitate the measure if President Trump vetoes it.

Lawmakers’ willingness to break with Saudi Arabia over Yemen was amplified after Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed in a Saudi consulate in Istanbul late last year, and intelligence strongly suggested that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the country’s de facto ruler, had ordered the operation or was at least aware of it.

Last year, the Senate voted unanimously to hold the crown prince responsible for Khashoggi’s slaying. A bipartisan group of lawmakers has backed sanctions against Saudi Arabia over Khashoggi’s killing, as well as a halt to weapons transfers, in comprehensive legislation that has yet to come up for a vote.

Only seven Senate Republicans joined Democrats on Wednesday to back the vote on ending support for the Saudi war effort.

For supporters of the measure, the vote was not just about taking a moral stand on Saudi Arabia’s human rights record, but also about asserting Congress’s constitutional privilege to declare war.

“Today, we begin the process of reclaiming our constitutional authority by ending U.S. involvement in a war that has not been authorized by Congress and is clearly unconstitutional,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the resolution’s chief sponsor, said on the Senate floor Wednesday.

Sanders teamed with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on the legislation, which seeks to invoke the War Powers Resolution to curtail American participation in the war. Senators also unanimously adopted amendments to the resolution stating that nothing in it could be construed as authorizing the use of military force, and leaving some room for continued intelligence sharing with the Saudi government.

If the resolution passes both chambers of Congress, it would mark the first time that Congress has successfully invoked the War Powers Resolution to end U.S. engagement in a conflict.

Opponents of the resolution warned Wednesday that it was “fundamentally flawed” and would compromise efforts to encourage a peaceful negotiated settlement to the Yemen conflict by making the U.S. position appear fractured.

“It is going to send a message to people that they don’t need to negotiate right now, that they are actually making gains,” Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman James E. Risch (R-Idaho) said on the Senate floor just before the vote. “I would urge my colleagues to vote against this at this time and give peace a chance through the negotiations.”

Supporters, however, argued that “if we pass this resolution, peace becomes more likely,” as Murphy put it Wednesday, arguing that when the Senate cast a similar vote last year, it seemed to help push the parties in the war toward declaring a cease fire in Hodeidah, a port city critical to bringing humanitarian supplies into Yemen.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+4 # harleysch 2019-03-14 10:20
Not reported in this article is that U.S. backing of the Saudi genocidal war in Yemen began under Saint Barack, in March 2015. Trump should not be continuing this, but he didn't start it.

I wonder why Democrats who voted for this resolution voted for the resolution to keep U.S. troops in Syria. It appears they are more anti-Trump than they are about peace. The only Dem who is really consistent against regime change wars is Tulsi Gabbard.
 
 
+2 # PABLO DIABLO 2019-03-14 15:06
The Congress has not declared War since World War II. What was that, about twenty Wars ago.The War Machine has been well fed. Most Americans don't even know about these Wars, let alone where and why we are fighting them. Next stop Venezuela.