RSN Fundraising Banner
A US City Just Granted Legal Rights to a Lake
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=46614"><span class="small">Yessenia Funes, Earther</span></a>   
Sunday, 03 March 2019 14:45

Funes writes: "Crystal Jankowski went into labor during the 2014 water crisis in Toledo, Ohio. The city's 276,000 residents couldn't use their tap water at all for a weekend in August-no drinking, bathing, nada. The water, supplied by Lake Erie, had become toxic due to the lake's dangerous algae overgrowth."

The way Lake Erie looked during the water crisis August 4, 2014. (photo: Getty Images)
The way Lake Erie looked during the water crisis August 4, 2014. (photo: Getty Images)


A US City Just Granted Legal Rights to a Lake

By Yessenia Funes, Earther

03 March 19

 

rystal Jankowski went into labor during the 2014 water crisis in Toledo, Ohio. The city’s 276,000 residents couldn’t use their tap water at all for a weekend in August—no drinking, bathing, nada. The water, supplied by Lake Erie, had become toxic due to the lake’s dangerous algae overgrowth.

Jankowski, who was preparing to give birth to her daughter in nearby St. Luke’s Hospital, had spent the last day with minor contractions. She knew her moment was coming, so she stressed over her inability to take a simple shower.

“As a woman who’s about to have 10 people all up in her hooha, you want to be clean,” Jankowski told Earther. “So it was awful to say the least.”

That event changed her life. And she didn’t let it end there.

As a mom who’s committed to community involvement, she and her neighbors worked to form a local environmental group, Toledoans for Safe Water. This week, they succeeded in passing a vote to develop the Lake Erie Bill of Rights Charter Amendment that recognizes the lake’s right “to exist, flourish, and naturally evolve,” as described by the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF), which partnered with Toledo residents to secure this special election. While similar laws recognizing the intrinsic rights of ecosystems have passed in Colombia, New Zealand, and India, this is the first of its kind in the United States.

The group “ugly cried” after finding out the vote passed by 61 percent Tuesday, Jankowski said. These new rights granted to Lake Erie are supposed to help protect it from the nitrogen and phosphorus-rich runoff, mainly from the agriculture sector, that fuels the algae blooms.

Lake Erie suffers from these blooms most summers, though they range in intensity. The blooms not only threaten drinking water; they hurt the economy by putting a damper on the recreational fishing industry and on tourism revenue. A bloom like the one in 2014 could result in $65 million in lost benefits to the local economy.

The problem’s gotten so severe that even local breweries are raising awareness through algae-infused green beer. And climate change is expected to worsen these blooms because high temperatures not only affect this algal growth, but the unpredictable weather patterns brought on by climate change may increase the region’s rainfall, causing more runoff to enter the lake.

The so-called Rights of Nature movement isn’t without its critics, but it gives environmentalists and stakeholders a legal option to protect a natural body when environmental regulations fail. Toledo, however, is unusual in that its residents voted to recognize these rights; historically, such decisions have come about through a court ruling.

It’s unclear how well this new amendment will stand up in court, but the Drewes Farm Partnership, an agriculture operation in Northwest Ohio, is already challenging the decision’s constitutionality in a complaint filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of Ohio. Tish O’Dell, the Ohio community organizer for CELDF isn’t too worried about whether the new amendment survives legal challenges. She knows laws won’t flip overnight.

“[This amendment is] about not only changing the law, but it’s about changing our culture and our relationship with nature and the environment,” she told Earther.

The hope is that this amendment inspires other communities around Lake Erie—and other parts of the U.S. dealing with water issues of their own—to plot similar local ballot measures. Maybe this amendment doesn’t survive in court, but others might. In the meantime, many locals are celebrating. Perhaps with an algae-inspired sour double IPA in hand.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+8 # SusanT136 2019-03-04 08:16
Awesome! Hopefully the amendment survives the legal challenge.

Drew’s Farms Partnership, like most large agricultural operations, refuses to take responsibility for its share of a growing problem in lakes all over the country. The Finger Lakes, in NYS, have had several years of a toxic blue green algae bloom.

“Drewes also believes that concentrated animal feeding operations are being maligned by people who don’t have accurate information. Manure applications to fields are monitored, and account for just a quarter of Lake Erie phosphorus, he said.

“To single out CAFOs” as the source of the problem is wrong, he said. “It’s the most heavily regulated agricultural operation I’ve ever seen.”
http://bgindependentmedia.org/farmer-asks-county-to-not-declare-lake-erie-impaired/

Well apparently it’s not being regulated enough, even if you think only 25% of the excess phosphorous in Lake Erie comes from farm runoff. And I suspect it’s a much higher percentage. Plus, the game has changed. With climate change comes more intense storms, making CAFO manure lagoons more vulnerable. And lake temperatures are warmer, requiring LESS runoff to be safe.

Granted, other sources also need to be challenged and dealt with. In NYS, besides farm runoff / manure, they’re also looking at other issues like overstressed septic systems etc.
https://www.pressconnects.com/story/news/local/watchdog/2018/09/13/blue-green-algae-toxicity-agriculture-dairy-farms-clean-water/1031631002/
 
 
+8 # BetaTheta 2019-03-04 09:46
The old question "Do trees have standing?" has been kicked down the road far too long. It is long past time to grapple legally with the issue of Nature rights, as we are an integral part of that Nature.