RSN Fundraising Banner
Paul Manafort a 'Hardened' and 'Bold' Criminal, Mueller Prosecutors Tell Judge
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=22958"><span class="small">Rachel Weiner, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Sunday, 24 February 2019 09:43

Weiner writes: "Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort is a 'hardened' criminal who 'repeatedly and brazenly violated the law,' prosecutors told a Washington federal judge."

Paul Manafort. (photo: Getty Images)
Paul Manafort. (photo: Getty Images)


Paul Manafort a 'Hardened' and 'Bold' Criminal, Mueller Prosecutors Tell Judge

By Rachel Weiner, The Washington Post

24 February 19

 

ormer Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort is a “hardened” criminal who “repeatedly and brazenly violated the law,” prosecutors told a Washington federal judge.

But in the filing submitted Friday and made partially public Saturday, they recommended no specific punishment for those crimes, saying that is the practice of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, whose office brought the case.

Prosecutors noted that federal guidelines call for a sentence of 17 to 22 years, although under Manafort’s guilty plea in his D.C. case, the maximum he faces behind bars is 10. The special counsel team said it may ask for Judge Amy Berman Jackson to impose a sentence that runs after any prison time Manafort is given for related crimes in Virginia federal court.

“Manafort chose repeatedly and knowingly to violate the law,” prosecutors said, from “garden-variety crimes such as tax fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and bank fraud” to “more esoteric laws” involving foreign lobbying.

He lied, they noted, “to tax preparers, bookkeepers, banks, the Treasury Department, the Department of Justice National Security Division, the FBI, the Special Counsel’s Office, the grand jury, his own legal counsel, Members of Congress, and members of the executive branch of the United States government.”

He committed crimes while leading a presidential campaign and while out on bail before trial, and then lied to investigators after pleading guilty, prosecutors said, revealing “a hardened adherence to committing crimes and lack of remorse.”

The charges in both cases flow from Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. The filing helps pave the way for Manafort’s sentencings in D.C. and Virginia scheduled for next month, as Mueller begins wrapping up his probe.

But the redacted, public document gives no details about Manafort’s campaign interactions with Russians. Prosecutors had previously asked the judge for permission to seal material either because it related to “ongoing law enforcement investigations” or “uncharged individuals.”

As part of his plea deal in September, Manafort, 69, acknowledged he was guilty of everything he was accused of both in Washington, D.C. and in Virginia: making millions as an unregistered lobbyist for Ukrainian politicians, hiding that money to avoid paying taxes, defrauding banks to pay his debts when his oligarch patrons fell out of power, and lying to cover up his crimes while trying to persuade witnesses to do the same.

The special counsel’s sentencing memo details Manafort’s illegal campaign to turn high-ranking American leaders against Ukrainian politician Yulia Tymoshenko and toward the pro-Russian strongman who put her in jail, Viktor Yanukovych. Hundreds of pages of exhibits show that Manafort was aware he was breaking the law and that he laundered the profits of his overseas lobbying efforts through offshore accounts.

When he appears in front of Jackson on March 13, he will already have been sentenced March 8 for related crimes in federal court in Alexandria, Va., barring any change in the scheduling as now set for those hearings. Jackson could make the sentence she imposes run during or after his Virginia prison term. In Virginia, where Manafort was found guilty of bank and tax fraud at trial, there is no upper limit to his sentence.

In Alexandria, prosecutors have also asked only for a “serious” sentence. Federal guidelines in that case call for him to spend roughly 19 to 24 years in prison.

Mueller’s prosecutors have been handing off other pending legal matters to the U.S. attorney’s office for D.C., and the Department of Justice is readying for Mueller to formally conclude his work.

In New York, the Manhattan district attorney is preparing to charge Manafort with violating state tax laws and committing other financial crimes, a move designed to ensure Trump’s former campaign chairman spends time in prison if the president pardons him for the convictions stemming from Mueller’s probe, Bloomberg News and the New York Times reported Friday. Trump has not indicated whether he intends to pardon Manafort, though he repeatedly expressed support for him as his trial played out last year. New York’s double jeopardy law, which protects defendants from being prosecuted twice for the same crimes, could pose a challenge for the district attorney’s office, however.

Attorneys for Manafort are not due to file their sentencing recommendation in D.C. until Monday, having told Jackson that this week’s snowstorm made it harder to meet with their client in the Alexandria jail where he has been held, and asking for a delay.

Under his plea agreement in D.C. federal prosecutors had agreed to ask Jackson to give Manafort credit at sentencing for cooperation. But because she found he lied to investigators and breached that agreement, they are no longer bound by it.

Jackson found Manafort lied about his interactions with Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime aide who the FBI assessed to have ties to Russian intelligence. Those contacts, prosecutors said in court, go “very much to the heart of what the special counsel’s office is investigating.”

Manafort gave inconsistent accounts of an August 2016 meeting in New York City at which he and Kilimnik discussed a peace plan for Ukraine, a top foreign policy priority for Russia. At the time, Manafort was still leading President Trump’s campaign. He also lied about sharing polling data with Kilimnik in 2016, prosecutors said in describing how he broke his deal to cooperate truthfully.

The judge also concluded that Manafort lied about a payment that he claimed was a loan and as part of another Justice Department investigation whose focus has not been described publicly.

Defense attorneys have maintained that Manafort did not intentionally give false information and that any inconsistencies were honest mistakes.

In 2017, Kilimnik denied to The Washington Post having connections to Russian intelligence. He was indicted with Manafort on charges of conspiring to obstruct justice through witness tampering.

Kilimnik is believed to be in Moscow and therefore probably safe from arrest because Russia does not extradite its citizens.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
-2 # harleysch 2019-02-24 13:47
The WaPo article above contains a brief indication of where some of the animus against Manafort comes from: "The special counsel’s sentencing memo details Manafort’s illegal campaign to turn high-ranking American leaders against Ukrainian politician Yulia Tymoshenko and toward the pro-Russian strongman who put her in jail, Viktor Yanukovych."

If you read the full section on this in the special counsel's filing, you will discover that Manafort is attacked for exposing Tymoshenko's ties to the neo-Nazi Bandera movement. Manafort wrote memos to both Obama administration officials and the Israelis on this. Still, the Obama admin backed Tymoshenko, and, through Nuland and others, later supported the coup, which relied on the neo-Nazi militia for muscle against Yanukovych.

It would be interesting to hear more about this. The line is that Manafort backed the "pro-Moscow" Yanukovych, despite evidence that he favored a balance between Russia and the EU. Instead, Brennan, Nuland and others put in power a gang of corrupt Russophobes, who were -- and still are -- dependent on neo-Nazi militias to remain in power. And, once in government, the coup leaders have acted to greatly damage the economy of Ukraine, under the direction of the IMF "economic hitmen."

Who are the real criminals here?
 
 
+8 # suzyskier 2019-02-24 14:02
Don’t try to tell me Trump knew nothing about this, please!
 
 
-1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-02-24 15:56
Someday there may be a judge courageous enough to tell these federal prosecutors that they are full of bullshit. Not this time, however.

Most likely Manafort will be sentenced and then the appeals process will begin. Mueller and the attorneys he assembled have a very bad record for having cases overturned on appeal. They just lie to the court and hide evidence. All that is pretty easy to bring out in an appeal. My guess is that Manafort's convictions will be overturned on appeal.