RSN Fundraising Banner
Migrant Families Still Being Separated at the Border, Report From Texas Group Says
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=44430"><span class="small">Daniella Silva, NBC News</span></a>   
Thursday, 21 February 2019 09:34

Silva writes: "Migrant families are still being separated by the Trump administration, sometimes over 'uncorroborated allegations' of crimes, according to a report published Thursday by a Texas civil rights group."

A family of migrants walk on the beach near the U.S.-Mexico border fence at Playas de Tijuana, Mexico, on Jan. 16, 2019. (photo: Guillermo Arias/Getty)
A family of migrants walk on the beach near the U.S.-Mexico border fence at Playas de Tijuana, Mexico, on Jan. 16, 2019. (photo: Guillermo Arias/Getty)


Migrant Families Still Being Separated at the Border, Report From Texas Group Says

By Daniella Silva, NBC News

21 February 19


The report comes roughly eight months since the government formally ended the policy.

igrant families are still being separated by the Trump administration, sometimes over "uncorroborated allegations" of crimes, according to a report published Thursday by a Texas civil rights group.

"Family separations are still very much happening in the southern border, they’re still being torn apart by the U.S. government," Efrén Olivares, director of racial and economic justice at the Texas Civil Rights Project, told NBC News.

While the separations were not happening at the same scale as when the Trump administration announced the “zero tolerance” policy last spring, some occurred under troubling circumstances, Olivares said. The report, which looked at cases between June 22 through Dec. 17 in McAllen, Texas, comes roughly eight months since the government formally ended the policy.

The report said it found 38 cases of parents and legal guardians separated from their children.

One of those cases involved Mr. Perez-Domingo, an indigenous migrant father from Guatemala whose primary language is Mam, according to the report. Perez-Domingo was separated from his 2-year-old daughter in July after being accused by Customs and Border Protection of not being the girl’s biological father and providing a fraudulent birth certificate, according to the report. He was not given an interpreter during his interview.

The civil rights group said it investigated the incident and discovered the birth certificate was authentic and a DNA test determined Perez-Domingo was the child’s father. They were reunited in August.

"The lack of assistance of translators, in combination with aggressive questioning by the CBP agent, resulted in severe discrimination and traumatic consequences for this indigenous family," the report says, adding, had the group "not interviewed this father early in the process, it is highly likely that Mr. Perez-Domingo would have been deported without his daughter, and his child unlawfully orphaned in the United States."

The report lists another migrant father, identified as Mr. A, whose 11-year-old daughter and 9-year-old son were taken from him over "uncorroborated allegations of gang affiliation." The civil rights group claimed that an investigation into the man’s background did not find evidence of known criminal convictions in the U.S. or in his home country of El Salvador or proof of any gang affiliation.

After the end of "zero tolerance," administration officials have said immigration authorities are separating families only if the adult is not the parent or legal guardian of the child, if the safety of the child is at risk or because of "serious criminal activity" by the adult.

Customs and Border Protection said in a statement that the the Texas Civil Rights Project had "published a flawed report without asking for or including input" from the federal agency. It also claimed the civil rights group used flawed data including "all types of familial relationships without regard to the statutory definition" of an unaccompanied migrant child.

Based on that definition, Customs and Border Protection acknowledged a total of 38 family separations in McAllen.

The Texas Civil Rights Project said it screened an estimated 9,800 adult migrants who were prosecuted for illegal entry into the U.S. and 492 adults prosecute for illegal reentry, most of whom were from Central America. The families were interviewed prior to their hearings at a federal courthouse in McAllen.

Of those cases, it found 272 instances of families being separated, among them 34 parent and child family separations, 107 cases of siblings being separated, 62 cases where children were separated from aunts or uncles and other cases involving separations from cousins, grandparents, legal guardians, stepparents or other caretakers. The youngest child was 8½ months old at the time she was separated from her mother.

In December, the Department of Homeland Security said from June 21 to Nov. 30, 81 children and 76 adults had been separated.

Under the “zero tolerance” policy last spring and early summer, migrants were prosecuted for crossing the border illegally, a misdemeanor for the first offense. Parents then ended up in federal custody and their children were separated from them.

After a swell of criticism from both parties and growing protests across the country, President Donald Trump announced an end to the policy in June. Later that month, a federal judge also ordered that the government reunify many of the separated families.

The government had identified more than 2,700 children who were separated under the policy. But it’s estimated that many more may have been separated since the summer of 2017, according a report by the HHS inspector general.

On Thursday afternoon, the American Civil Liberties Union will argue in federal court that families separated before the June 2018 ruling should be covered under the reunification lawsuit.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # DongiC 2019-02-21 11:04
What is the problem here? Families are not to be separated but despite judicial decisions and legislative actions they still are. Are our people on border patrol so dense that they can't get this simple message straight? Trump has some real bright lights in ICE who are still separating children from their families. America is becoming a first class farce covered in shame and infamy for the way it treats children of immigrants. Reuniting these families should be a first class priority. Maybe it will take divine intervention or something on a cosmic scale.
 
 
+2 # evenstephen 2019-02-21 13:04
Isn't it time to admit that hatred, bigotry, and persecuting people for the color of their skin or their country of origin is no way to run a country? This is being done in your name, in my name, and I resent it. That's not who I am, and I doubt it's who you are.
It's time to change direction in some very fundamental ways. Either that, or risk losing our humanity altogether. The choice is ours. The next election cannot come soon enough.
 
 
+1 # johnescher 2019-02-22 10:42
Quoting evenstephen:
Isn't it time to admit that hatred, bigotry, and persecuting people for the color of their skin or their country of origin is no way to run a country? This is being done in your name, in my name, and I resent it. That's not who I am, and I doubt it's who you are.
It's time to change direction in some very fundamental ways. Either that, or risk losing our humanity altogether. The choice is ours. The next election cannot come soon enough.


I hope I don't denigrate any of the other investigations of the "president" when I say he should immediately be impeached and tried and convicted on this one point alone.