RSN Fundraising Banner
New Trump Rules Make It Easier for US Gun Makers to Sell Overseas
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50109"><span class="small">Josh Lederman, NBC News</span></a>   
Thursday, 07 February 2019 13:36

Lederman writes: "Semi-automatic weapons, flamethrowers and even some grenades will become easier for U.S. weapons manufacturers to export overseas under new rules being put in place by the Trump administration and obtained by NBC News."

AR-15 rifles are displayed on the exhibit floor during the National Rifle Association (NRA) annual meeting in Louisville, Kentucky. (photo: Luke Sharrett/Getty)
AR-15 rifles are displayed on the exhibit floor during the National Rifle Association (NRA) annual meeting in Louisville, Kentucky. (photo: Luke Sharrett/Getty)


New Trump Rules Make It Easier for US Gun Makers to Sell Overseas

By Josh Lederman, NBC News

07 January 19


Manufacturers will no longer need State Department licenses to export dozens of weapons.

emi-automatic weapons, flamethrowers and even some grenades will become easier for U.S. weapons manufacturers to export overseas under new rules being put in place by the Trump administration and obtained by NBC News.

Under the new rules, set to take effect in just under a month, gun-makers will no longer need licenses from the Department of State to sell dozens of types of weapons to other countries, including semi-automatic assault weapons such as the AR-15 that has been employed in many of America’s worst mass shootings. Instead, sellers will need only a no-fee license from the Department of Commerce, which has a less onerous licensing process and a smaller global footprint, making it harder to track how the weapons are ultimately used overseas.

The new rules come as efforts to strengthen gun control in the United States, a key priority in the Obama administration, have stalled under President Donald Trump despite continued mass shootings. Democrats have signaled they plan to use their newfound control of the House of Representatives to revisit the issue, starting with a House Judiciary Committee hearing held Wednesday — the first in about eight years.

The Trump administration first floated the changes last year, rejuvenating a campaign to simplify export rules that had been contemplated by the administration of President Barack Obama but then dropped after the mass shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012. The State Department sent the final version of the rules to key lawmakers Monday as part of the mandatory “congressional notification” process. The rules will take effect 30 days later unless Congress takes the unlikely step of passing a resolution to block them.

A copy of the new regulations, marked “Only for State internal use,” says that supervision for exports of any semi-automatic firearms that don’t use caseless ammunition will move from the State Department to the Commerce Department. The same applies to shotguns, other than those that are fully automatic.

Those who want to export flamethrowers that project a stream of fire up to 20 meters (about 66 feet) will no longer need a State Department license. A new paragraph in the rules states that grenades, too, will now fall under the Commerce Department if they contain “non-lethal or less lethal projectiles.” Most parts, components and ammunition for firearms are also being moved to the Commerce Department.

Part of Trump’s push to reduce regulations governmentwide, the new rules aim to assist American gun manufacturers by making it simpler to export products that the administration says are already “widely available for retail sale in the United States.” Exports of weapons deemed to have an “inherently military function” or to provide the U.S. with a military advantage will remain controlled by the State Department.

But gun control advocates and many Democrats have voiced concerns about the proliferation of weapons in places where, unlike the United States, deadly weapons aren’t readily available at sporting goods stores or retailers like Walmart.

“In most countries, it is much more difficult to obtain any kind of firearm, much less a semi-automatic rifle or a flamethrower,” said John Lindsay-Poland, a gun trafficking expert at the human rights group Global Exchange. “In a context where such weapons aren’t available to ordinary people, they become weapons of war, whether we’re talking about insurgencies or terrorist organizations or organized crime. They use those weapons to control territory, carry out acts against civilians and to contest state power.”

The changes also mean that sales of less than $1 million in arms will not require advance notification to Congress, which allows lawmakers a period of time to block a potential sale. That process has in the past been used to stop sales of firearms to countries of concern.

In 2017, opposition from lawmakers thwarted a Trump administration proposal to let Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s bodyguards buy $1.2 million in U.S. guns, following violence against protesters during his visit to Washington, D.C. A similar process stopped the U.S. from selling tens of thousands of assault weapons to the Philippines’ national police in 2016.

Under the new rules, exporting guns will also cost less. Unlike the State Department, which charges an annual $2,240 fee for licenses to export firearms, the Commerce Department's licensing process doesn’t require a fee.

Although some Democratic opposition is expected to the new rules, they are likely to take effect anyway. New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez, the top Democrat on the Senate’s foreign relations panel, plans to put a hold on the rules, The New York Times has reported. But to block the rules permanently, Congress would have to pass a resolution disapproving them, a maneuver that has been rarely attempted and even less frequently successful.

A State Department official, speaking anonymously because the final rules haven’t been publicly released, stressed that all firearm exports will still be monitored by the U.S. government, via the Commerce Department.

The official said the changes would “significantly reduce the regulatory burden on the U.S. commercial firearms and ammunition industry, promote American exports, and clarify the regulatory requirements for independent gunsmiths, while at the same time prioritizing national security controls and continuing our ability to restrict exports where human rights, illicit trafficking, and related issues may be of concern.”

In public comments submitted to the Federal Register after the Trump administration first proposed the rules in May, the National Rifle Association voiced its support, arguing that the Commerce Department is fully capable of regulating gun exports.

Still, the Institute for Legislative Action — the gun group’s lobbying arm — encouraged the administration to tweak the rules by removing even more categories of items from the State Department’s control, including silencers and high-capacity magazines.

“The NRA believes that, on the whole, the proposal correctly balances the imperatives of national and global security, allocation of oversight resources, and promotion of American industry, innovation, and competiveness,” Christopher Zealand, the group’s senior research attorney. wrote.

Yet many of the almost 3,000 comments received by the government argued against the easing of the export rules, warning of the risk of increasing gun trafficking and needlessly enriching the gun manufacturing industry.

“To cite just a few reasons, it will make it easier for dictators, organized crime, and terrorists to obtain guns in large quantities,” one of them, Marilyn Guterman, commented. “Please, in the name of peace and sanity do not allow this to happen.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+1 # wilhelmscream 2019-02-07 15:09
That’s a BIG PROLEM!! The wrong buyer WILL use them in a crime, I.E. ISIS, Al quada (sorry about the spelling) and other terrorists (IRA no longer exists)
 
 
+1 # wilhelmscream 2019-02-07 15:15
No jokes about the IRA, please; it would be like endorsing the KKK
 
 
-2 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-02-08 12:13
"But gun control advocates and many Democrats have voiced concerns about the proliferation of weapons in places where, unlike the United States, deadly weapons aren’t readily available at sporting goods stores or retailers like Walmart."


I wonder where this is? Maybe a few places in Europe, Japan, or China. The world is awash in weapons.


"Although some Democratic opposition is expected to the new rules, they are likely to take effect anyway. "


I wonder why Democrats are so lackadaisical about gun control. When there is a tragedy like a school shooting, they wring their hands for a week or so and then they just go silent. Democrats should have very specific proposals in circulation right now. Obama suggested his massive enhanced background check, but it was just impractical. It would have put 100% of everyone's information in the databases of the FBI. Really, no one wanted that. There must be other ways.

Democrats have become the party of complaining and doing nothing. They need to change that right now, if they hope to retake the White House in 2020. Trump is getting known for doing things -- most of them are bad but people like to see a politician actually do something.
 
 
0 # DongiC 2019-02-09 09:20
America the Insane is ready to export more of its weaponry to other nations. Soon, flame throwers, grenades, AR-15's will reach foreign markets. So other countries can have massacres like we do and learn the pain of grieving for relatives who fall victim to these horrible weapons. Can a whole nation be institutionaliz ed ? I have one in mind. One that has a defense budget of $716 billion dollars next year,
800 military bases scattered all over the world, 12 aircraft carriers, 15 Trident class submarines with each sub armed with 24 missiles containing 8 warheads each. Plus, the trillion dollar air fleet of F-35's not to mention all the other planes in our armed forces from B52's to F23's. Many of these planes can deliver nuclear bombs of which we have a very large number (bombs). Plus, all the ICBM's in silos in wheat and corn fields from Missouri to Montana. Why we can bring Armageddon several times over to planet earth.

Why the addiction to overkill? Has destruction become our new deity?