RSN Fundraising Banner
Trump's Transgender Military Service Ban Just Got a Big Win From the Supreme Court
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=33386"><span class="small">German Lopez, Vox</span></a>   
Tuesday, 22 January 2019 13:52

Lopez writes: "The Supreme Court on Tuesday took a dramatic step toward reviving President Donald Trump's ban on transgender troops."

The U.S. Supreme Court on a snowy day. (photo: Al Drago/Getty)
The U.S. Supreme Court on a snowy day. (photo: Al Drago/Getty)


Trump's Transgender Military Service Ban Just Got a Big Win From the Supreme Court

By German Lopez, Vox

22 January 19


The Trump administration may soon be able to enforce its ban, thanks to the Supreme Court.

he Supreme Court on Tuesday took a dramatic step toward reviving President Donald Trump’s ban on transgender troops.

Previously, lower courts had placed injunctions on the transgender ban, stopping the Trump administration from enforcing it.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court put a hold on some of those injunctions. But because one lower court injunction was not part of the cases the Supreme Court put a hold on, the ban can’t be enforced just yet. It is likely, though, that soon the remaining injunction will be put on hold as well.

If that happens, the Trump administration will be able to enforce its ban on transgender people serving openly in the military.

The Court’s liberal wing contested the decision allowing enforcement of the ban, but the conservative majority outnumbers the Court’s liberal minority 5-4.

The Supreme Court did not decide yet whether it will directly oversee a case on the trans ban. It merely lifted some lower courts’ injunctions.

The ruling hands Trump a major victory after he replaced Anthony Kennedy, formerly the Supreme Court’s consistently centrist justice, with the very conservative Brett Kavanaugh.

Trump’s ban on transgender troops is based on a wrong premise

In 2017, Trump said that he would reinstate a ban on openly trans people serving in the military — moving to undo previous work by President Barack Obama’s administration to overturn the old ban. But Trump’s ban was held up by courts, forcing the military to allow openly trans recruits to join starting in 2018.

Trump argued in a series of tweets in July 2017, “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming … victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail.”

In August 2017, the White House put out the actual policy behind those tweets. According to the administration, it would effectively return to the pre-2016 era in which trans troops could not serve openly. It would also ban the military from paying for gender-affirming surgeries, with some exceptions to “protect the health” of someone who had already begun transitioning.

The guidance also allowed the secretary of defense, after consulting with the secretary of homeland security, some wiggle room to decide what to do with already serving trans service members — and it let them advise the president on reversing the ban.

The policy was to take effect in March 2018, reversing the Obama administration’s decision to undo the military’s longstanding ban on openly serving trans troops.

But federal courts halted the ban from going through, finding in part that trans service members who challenged the policy were likely to prevail. As a result, openly serving trans service members were able to join the military starting on January 1, 2018, and the military has already paid for some for trans-inclusive medical services, including gender-affirming surgeries.

Then in March 2018, the Trump administration unveiled version 2.0 of the ban. Following a Pentagon review, the White House rescinded the previous ban and approved a new memo that declares that “transgender persons with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria — individuals who the policies state may require substantial medical treatment, including medications and surgery — are disqualified from military service except under certain limited circumstances.” The prohibition includes people who have already transitioned.

The move is expected to ban most trans people from openly serving in the military, with exceptions for people who already began serving as trans prior to the memo and trans people who have been “stable for 36 consecutive months in their biological sex prior to accession.” But lower courts put the ban on hold — at least until the Supreme Court got involved.

The research, based on the experiences of other countries, shows that the costs associated with trans service members are actually very small. A 2016 review of the evidence by the RAND Corporation found that by allowing trans-inclusive medical care, “active-component health care costs would increase by between $2.4 million and $8.4 million annually, representing a 0.04 to 0.13 percent increase in active-component health care expenditures” — a tiny amount.

This small cost may not mean much in budget terms, but it could mean a lot to trans soldiers. As the American Medical Association and American Psychiatric Association point out, transitioning helps reduce gender dysphoria — a state of emotional distress caused by how someone’s body or the gender they were assigned at birth conflicts with their gender identity. Untreated gender dysphoria, which not all trans people experience in the same way, can lead to anxiety, depression, and even suicide, so treating it could mean fewer mental health issues for trans people serving in the military.

With the Supreme Court’s decision on Tuesday, though, the ban on transgender troops could soon take effect anyway.

For more on Trump’s ban on trans troops, read Vox’s explainer.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Sunday, 27 January 2019 11:52
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # lorenbliss 2019-01-22 23:45
This proves as absolute truth what I've been saying for some time: with the Robber Court functioning as the ChristoNazi dictatorship of the Imperial United States, any effort at progressive reform is a waste of time, doomed from the beginning.

Just as every progressive gain we've thus far managed to retain from the New Deal era is likewise doomed.

In other words, the Empire is now officially at that point prophesied by the martyred President John Fitzgerald Kennedy: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
 
 
+3 # jwb110 2019-01-23 09:51
I wonder how many of the men on the SCOTUS even served in the Military or have even met a transgender person?
I think the real life issue to be looked at is that if you start to exclude more and more people from participating fully in the US when you need them, and that inevitably happens, they have no reason to defend a system that doesn't defend them. This is the real life issue of these "bans" and exclusion and marginalizing of segments of society.
There isn't much of the Democracy left in the US given the potUS and scotUS and what will protect them when they need it?
 
 
+3 # Art947 2019-01-23 11:32
My thoughts exactly when I started to read about this decision. A draft-dodging, lying scumbag makes a decision about the military and a group of hypocritical, bastard judges(?) enforce it. The sooner time wounds all these heels, the better!