RSN Fundraising Banner
Businesses Hit Hard by Trump Shutdown Are Suddenly Silent About the GOP Lawmakers They Bankrolled
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15321"><span class="small">Josh Israel, ThinkProgress</span></a>   
Saturday, 19 January 2019 13:34

Israel writes: "American businesses are losing hundreds of millions of dollars every day President Donald Trump's partial government shutdown - now the longest on record - rages on."

Business organizations have vigorously objected to shutdowns before, particularly when they occurred under Democratic presidents. (photo: WP)
Business organizations have vigorously objected to shutdowns before, particularly when they occurred under Democratic presidents. (photo: WP)

Businesses Hit Hard by Trump Shutdown Are Suddenly Silent About the GOP Lawmakers They Bankrolled

By Josh Israel, ThinkProgress

19 January 19

Companies that spent big in 2018 to support Congressional Republicans -- who hold the power to re-open the government -- are paying the price.

merican businesses are losing hundreds of millions of dollars every day President Donald Trump’s partial government shutdown — now the longest on record — rages on. But few industry leaders say they are pressuring Republican members of Congress they bankrolled to end the shutdown — even though few have chosen to break ranks with the president to reopen the government with a veto-proof majority of votes.

Business organizations have vigorously objected to shutdowns before, particularly when they occurred under Democratic presidents.

In 2013, when Barack Obama was president, the conservative National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) likened a government shutdown to kings sacrificing the wellbeing of the peasants. William C. Dunkelberg, chief economist of the NFIB (which calls itself “the voice of small business”), said then that “the president’s ego is at stake. He refuses to compromise or negotiate.” Dunkelberg said the resulting impasse would hurt “the little people,” such as small businesses with government contracts and workers living paycheck-to-paycheck. “We need to elect better,” he concluded.

The organization responded by spending against Democrats: NFIB’s political action committee distributed millions of dollars — almost exclusively to Republican House and Senate candidates — in the 2014, 2016, and 2018 elections. But did they “elect better”? Six years after Dunkelberg’s statement, a Republican president has shut down the government to try to force American taxpayers to bankroll a border wall he’d promised Mexico would fully fund. Most congressional Republicans are standing with him.

This time, the NFIB has been suspiciously quiet, and it did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry. NFIB is not alone among interest groups representing the business community.

The nation’s largest business group, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, spent millions of dollars in independent expenditures in 2018 in support of congressional Republicans, including recently appointed Arizona Sen. Martha McSally ($2 million), Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn ($1.5 million), Florida Sen. Rick Scott ($750,000), Mississippi Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith ($675,000), Alabama Rep. Martha Roby ($342,902), Ohio Rep. Anthony Gonzalez ($300,000), and Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon ($250,000).

These lawmakers are now standing with Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to perpetuate the shutdown. The chamber sent an open letter to Congress on Jan. 8 noting that the “shutdown is harming the American people, the business community, and the economy.” The letter urged a compromise “that combines increasing border security with protection and legal status for Dreamers and long-term beneficiaries of the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program” — a compromise that would the government immediately.

But asked if the chamber or its members were concerned that the candidates they bankrolled are obstructing efforts to reopen the government, a spokesperson told ThinkProgress only that “the letter covers it all on the impact of the shutdown.”

A ThinkProgress examination of corporate PAC contributions to the National Republican Congressional Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee (the official campaign arms of the House and Senate Republican Conferences) found that hundreds of companies and trade associations contributed five-figure or larger donations in the 2018 campaign in support of the GOP majorities. Many of these PACs represented companies or industries already feeling the effects of the shutdown. ThinkProgress reached out to several to ask whether they would support the efforts by congressional Democrats and a few fed-up Republicans to reopen the government immediately.

The largest combined donor to the GOP committees was Northrop Grumman, funneling $330,000 through its primary corporate PAC and its subsidiary Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems Inc. PAC. While the partial shutdown does not include the Defense Department, the contracting behemoth did release an announcement in December noting that “[s]ome activities may be impacted by the Government shutdown.” The company did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry.

Boeing ($196,000 in PAC donations) may also feel the harms of the shutdown. The Federal Aviation Administration is one of the shuttered agencies and its inspectors must approve any new planes added to an airline’s fleet, potentially impacting its sales. The company did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry.

Airlines are also feeling the pinch. Delta’s CEO told CNBC this week that the shutdown was costing his business about $25 million a month. His company gave $60,000 in PAC money to the Republican campaign committees. Asked whether Delta was pushing those lawmakers it helped elect to do something about the shutdown, a spokesperson told ThinkProgress, “We don’t have any comment beyond what our CEO, Ed Bastian, has already said publicly.”

United Airlines, which also gave $60,000 in PAC money, is also concerned. CEO Oscar Munoz told CNBC: “Clearly, the longer this goes, of course, there’s going to be impact, and we do worry about that.” A spokesperson forwarded to ThinkProgress a recent earnings call where company leaders “made clear our elected leaders in Washington need to reopen the government as soon as possible.”

American Airlines ($30,000 in PAC money) has reportedly experienced a hold-up in its aircraft approval, but did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry.

The rest of the travel and tourism industry is also suffering. A spokesperson for the U.S. Travel Association, which gave $45,000 in PAC donations to the House and Senate GOP committees, did not respond to questions about reopening the government but did note a recent press release in which the group estimated that shutdown could cost the travel economy “more than $100 million daily.”

The National Association of Realtors also spent big ($180,000 in PAC donations) to back congressional Republicans. A series of posts on the group’s website noted the negative impact the shutdown on federal housing and mortgage programs and other government agencies has already had on the real estate market. Nearly a quarter of the trade group’s members surveyed said they felt an impact on current and potential clients. In a video, the organization’s chief economist made clear the shutdown was harming the market and expressed hope that it would end soon. But the group did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry about the topic.

A related trade group — the Mortgage Bankers Association — donated $150,000 in PAC contributions to the GOP campaign committees. Back in 2013, the group’s then-president denounced a government shutdown and demanded its immediate end. “The federal government shutdown will have a growing impact on the housing market the longer it continues”, David H. Stevens said. "If this shutdown is temporary, the ones affected most will be out of work federal employees. However, the longer it goes, the greater impact it will have on borrowers, the housing market, and the national economy.” This time around, the group has not posted a statement and did not respond to a ThinkProgress inquiry.

The beer industry is another consumer sector impacted by the shutdown. Companies are reportedly unable to launch any new products while the regulatory agencies overseeing them are shuttered. Anheuser-Busch, America’s largest beer company, gave $180,000 to the Republican campaign arms through its corporate PAC. The National Beer Wholesalers Association, the trade group for distributors, kicked in another $60,000. Neither responded to ThinkProgress inquiries.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Saturday, 19 January 2019 14:15


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+14 # economagic 2019-01-19 20:44
Yes, the only thing the money-worshiper s* love more than money itself is their ideology that money really IS "the measure of all things," and they are willing to spend a lot of it in defense of that "principal principle." Remember, it was the education chair of the US Chamber of Giant Corporations to whom soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell addressed his infamous "Memo" in 1971.

Remember, a "small business" today may have a thousand or more employees. A business with a mere fifty is merely invisible.

* Money-worshiper s: capital-ists -- the American Heritage Dictionary explicitly recognizes "money" as one meaning of "capital," while the staid Merriam-Webster recognizes only "money to be used in a business."
+8 # PABLO DIABLO 2019-01-20 01:31
"The best government money can buy".
+1 # economagic 2019-01-20 20:31
SURELY we could buy a better one if "they" had not done us out of what little money they ever allowed to pass through our hands.
+4 # chrisconno 2019-01-20 11:59
Citizens United, the gift that just keeps on giving.
+2 # dquandle 2019-01-20 15:08
Bequeathed upon us by the "democrats" who happily voted in John Roberts.
+2 # Diane_Wilkinson_Trefethen_aka_tref 2019-01-21 16:42
Quoting dquandle:
Bequeathed upon us by the "democrats" who happily voted in John Roberts.
I would never defend the Democratic Party leadership from charges of assisting the Republican elites from taking over the government but holding them responsible as if they were the movers and shakers in this coup is an unreasonable stretch. They obviously thought the party would do better as Republican-Lite , the “loyal opposition”, than as softly progressive. However, since events of the last 50 years have proven that approach to be flawed, fatally so, it should be obvious that thoughtful, logical people would appreciate the need to change course. Unfortunately, the behavior of the DNC, repressing Progressives, has not been encouraging. Nevertheless, there is still one path to redemption: the current border wall/shutdown stalemate.

If Pelosi and Schumer persist in demanding the shutdown and the wall be separated and the former ended before any negotiations on the latter, that would be a signal that business as usual MIGHT be a policy of the past. If they cave, not to demands for a wall but to demands that ending the shutdown be predicated on funding a wall, then there will be no escaping this extortion policy in the future. Every appropriation, every bill, every demand will first need to meet the approval of the Anerican dictator.