RSN Fundraising Banner
Warning: A 'Shrinking Window' of Usable Groundwater
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49954"><span class="small">Tara Lohan, The Revelator</span></a>   
Monday, 14 January 2019 13:46

Lohan writes: "We're living beyond our means when it comes to groundwater. That's probably not news to everyone, but new research suggests that, deep underground in a number of key aquifers in some parts of the U.S., we may have much less water than previously thought."

Produced water from gas drilling in the Marcellus shale. (photo: Tara Lohan)
Produced water from gas drilling in the Marcellus shale. (photo: Tara Lohan)

Warning: A 'Shrinking Window' of Usable Groundwater

By Tara Lohan, The Revelator

14 January 19


e're living beyond our means when it comes to groundwater. That's probably not news to everyone, but new research suggests that, deep underground in a number of key aquifers in some parts of the U.S., we may have much less water than previously thought.

"We found that the average depth of water resources across the country was about half of what people had previously estimated," said Jennifer McIntosh, a distinguished scholar and professor of hydrology and atmospheric sciences at the University of Arizona.

McIntosh and her colleagues—who published a new study about these aquifers in November in Environmental Research Letters—took a different approach to assessing groundwater than other research, which has used satellites to measure changes in groundwater storage. For example, a 2015 study looked at 37 major aquifers across the world and found some were being depleted faster than they were being replenished, including in California's agriculturally intensive Central Valley.

McIntosh says those previous studies revealed a lot about how we're depleting water resources from the top down through extraction, such as pumping for agriculture and water supplies, especially in places like California.

But McIntosh and three other researchers wanted to look at groundwater from a different perspective: They examined how we're using water resources from the bottom up.

The study may help close the gap about what we know and don't know regarding how much water is available deep underground, as well as its quality.

It also rings some alarm bells.

A Different Approach

Instead of examining how fast water tables were falling, as in previous studies, the researchers looked at water chemistry to determine how deep underground you could drill for freshwater or brackish water before that water became too salty to use.

"We looked at the bottom limit of groundwater resources," said McIntosh.

The researchers used information from the U.S. Geological Survey on the quality of groundwater across the country and looked specifically at salinity—how salty the water is. "We looked basin by basin at how that depth of fresh and brackish water changes across the United States," said McIntosh.

The results were about half as much usable water as previous estimates. That means that deep groundwater reserves are not nearly as plentiful as we'd thought in some places.

That's important because when shallow groundwater reserves become depleted or polluted, the strategy so far has been to drill deeper and deeper wells to keep the water flowing.

But we may not always be able to drill our way out of water shortages. "Tapping into these deep waters works for now, but the long-term prospects for using these waters are quite concerning," said the report's lead author, Grant Ferguson, an associate professor in the department of Civil and Geological Engineering at the University of Saskatchewan.

The problem isn't evenly distributed across the country. While a number of aquifers in the West have deep freshwater reserves, the water in parts of the eastern and central U.S. becomes salty at much shallower depths. "Drilling deeper water wells to address groundwater depletion issues represents no more than a stopgap measure in these areas," the researchers concluded in their paper. One area of particular concern the researchers noted was in the Anadarko and Sedgwick basins underlying parts of Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, which has particularly shallow freshwater reserves.

Oil and Water

The study looked at a total of 28 sedimentary basins across the U.S. that were chosen because they're known to contain oil and gas reserves.

The researchers found that the oil and gas industry uses fresh and brackish water, both of which are drawn from the bottom up. And that's another element of the research that could raise concern.

In some cases the industry pumps out brackish water as part of its drilling operations. Industry waste is then injected back underground into deep aquifers. As a result, water reserves are depleted from pumping and possibly contaminated during re-injection, the researchers found.

The depth between oil and gas activities and drinking water reserves varied greatly across the country. Wyoming and the Michigan basin were two places where oil and gas activities are relatively shallow and in close proximity to fresh and brackish water, which could increase the chances of contamination of water resources. Water contamination from oil and gas activity has already been documented in Pavillion, Wyoming.

The authors suggest that carefully monitoring for potential contamination or overexploitation of water reserves may be crucial in these areas with minimal separation between groundwater and oil and gas wells used for either production or disposal.

The Future Is … Saltier

While brackish water can be used for some types of agriculture and by oil and gas activities, it hasn't been used much yet for drinking because it requires desalination (although not as intensively as seawater). But as water resources become more constrained, particularly in the arid West where some communities and farms rely exclusively on groundwater, brackish water may be a more valuable future resource and a larger part of the water supply.

"I think of it in terms of water security. Both fresh and brackish aquifers are part of our potential water source into the future," said McIntosh.

But further utilizing these deep-water resources will have "all kinds of policy and economic consequences because they aren't going to be replenished as quickly as other waters" closer to the surface, said Ferguson. And that may mean better monitoring of oil and gas activity is needed in those regions, along with a possible rethinking of how we permit and manage drilling into those deep waters. "That would change the nature of how we're using water in a lot of places," he said.

While this research adds to our growing knowledge of groundwater resources, there is still a lot we don't know about the chemistry of these deep aquifers beyond just salinity, said McIntosh. Addressing that knowledge gap, she said, will be important as we work to match water resources to our varying needs for drinking, industry and agriculture.

"This 'bottom up' approach is a novel one and will find great utility, but it does depend upon the availability of deep groundwater data," said Michael Campana, a professor and hydrogeologist at Oregon State University who did not participate in the study. And the deeper we go, the less data we have, said Ferguson.

Both the researchers and outside experts suggest that more research is needed. This is particularly true in areas not associated with oil and gas activity that weren't part of the study, Campana points out. But the authors say their results may still show the need for important changes on policy or behavioral levels regarding how we use our nation's groundwater.

"There was this idea that deeper groundwater would be more pristine, and it is to a point, but there are all kinds of natural salinity and hydrocarbon problems once you get into deeper and deeper groundwater systems," said Ferguson. "So we're working with that idea that maybe the window of freshwater is not as big as we thought and it's probably getting even smaller in a lot of areas."

In an age of climate change, that's something that may play out sooner rather than later.

Email This Page your social media marketing partner
Last Updated on Monday, 14 January 2019 15:24


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+3 # elizabethblock 2019-01-14 22:46
A lot of groundwater is fossil water - it's been there for millions of years - and once it's gone, it's gone.
A lot of the water in the Great Lakes is effectively fossil water as well. Thousands of years old, not millions, but only a few per cent is renewed annually. And with climate change, that may be reduced even further.
+5 # dotlady 2019-01-15 00:04
Yes - fracking has to stop - uses many millions of gallons per frack, adn then pumps the waste water back into the earth where it can leach into aquifers. And nuclear plants, like Indian Point up the Hudson River from NYC, use 2.5 billion gallons a day to cool the spent fuel rods. If we don't stop this and use the water for drinking and growing food, we're doomed.
+5 # RLF 2019-01-15 06:45
Welcome to the effects of global overpopulation and climate change. I remember driving through Oklahoma in the early 80's and all of the trees along the rivers were dead because the ground water had been sucked down too deep by all of the agricultural pumping in order to grow things the land wouldn't support naturally. The future holds more of this and starvation. welcome to pretending we can become vegan and still support 10 billion people on the planet!
+1 # bardphile 2019-01-15 13:11
Wow. The elephant in the room finally gets a nod. For groundwater depletion and many other reasons, we need to stop the growth of population and then gradually but sharply reduce it.
+1 # Texas Aggie 2019-01-15 08:26
This is yet another area where the libertarian freedom to do whatever you want for financial gain runs up against the rights of people to have potable water. How do they propose to solve the problem? Or maybe they don't feel that having potable water is a right.
+4 # Jim Young 2019-01-15 10:44
Tershia d'Eglin's "The Man Who Thought He Owned Water: On the Brink with American Farms, Cities, and Food" (winner of the 2017 Colorado Book Award for Creative Non-Fiction) is a moving personal story from one Colorado farming family's perspective.

To me, she covers the family's creating the irrigation that enabled the founding of Greeley, Colorado, using the 1st half of the book to describe the real people as interestingly as James Michner did in "Centennial" (he used fictional characters based on real people), and used the last half to detail the problems with an incredible amount of science based evidence and coping tactics that need to become even better long term strategies.

See the reviews at the University Press Colorado site (upcolorado dot com), the first of which says:

“This is the best book I’ve read since Major John Wesley Powell’s epic work over a century ago, on why the American West will always thirst for water. Using her own pioneering family history in Colorado, d'Elgin weaves past and present into a personal memoir that is touching, funny, and prescient of what’s to come. Anyone concerned about our national drought and the fallout on our food and where it comes from must read this book.”

—Betty Harper Fussell, writer and food historian